EVE Search - For interested blaster ship pilots: patch changes vs. blaster ships

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Test Server Feedback

For interested blaster ship pilots: patch changes vs. blaster ships

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Ephemeron North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.01.22 18:36:00 - [1] best solution would be to undo the ridiculous changes of Quantum Rise patch Webs should be 90% Ships should be able to fit for speed to compensate - full nano support, aside from polycarb rigs Ships may keep their agility if scan res of all ships is boosted by same amount as agility No warp scrambler MWD shut off effect That is the real root of the problem.
Ephemeron North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.01.22 19:51:00 - [2] Originally by: Hirana Yoshida 90% webs were what allowed BS to own everything else regardless of fittings, let's not go back down that heinous alley ... I kind of like my ships requiring some thought if I want them to survive. People are sure quick for forget nano-cruisers That's why CCP can get away with these horrible nerfs - people forget what they lost.
Ephemeron North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.01.23 19:58:00 - [3] increasing blaster tracking by 50% would indeed be the simplest fix. But then the Autocannons would look crap in comparison. the proper solution, as I said before, is to address the cause of the problem, not to treat a symptom. And the cause of the problem is Quantum Rise patch. CCP refuses to admit any wrong doing and remove the person responsible from office. Just like Iceland government people refuse to admit any wrong doing and resign. I find that kinda funny
Ephemeron North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.01.28 20:04:00 - [4] Edited by: Ephemeron on 28/01/2009 20:04:49 Originally by: Chi Quan Edited by: Chi Quan on 28/01/2009 19:37:47 don't forget the ships in the tournament all have one mid free, because they don't need to fit against warping out. those megas WERE ALREADY SITTING ON TOP of their enemy (what equals a wtz). plus idle empire, lived up to their name and were just plain idle, no maneuvering. edit: Pulse lasers in action If that was a real PvP fight - the bc gang would not engage the 3 megas at blaster range. They'd either jump thru, or most likely - orbit at 20km and if megas successfully focus fire on any one of them - MWD out of range, possibly warping out and back in. They'd also try kill ishkurs or whatever small tacklers the megas would have first. At best, the megas would kill 1-2 bcs and the rest of them would run away. The lack of manuevering on side of Idle Empire was definitely a huge mistake.
Ephemeron North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.02.01 23:03:00 - [5] Originally by: Lalita Prestoc Blaming weapons for missing a fixed object because you fail to fly away correctly and created transversal Plus using ammo with a tracking penalty... there's a reason everyone uses faction close range ammo instead of void/hail/conflag. The reason this whole mess started is cause CCP screwed up webs and ship agility.
Ephemeron North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.02.02 06:58:00 - [6] Goumindong bringing back the crazy, I was starting to doubt him when he made some sense about agility and lock speed problem. But hey, the current CCP game design people seem to have the same type of crazy. I'm not trying to insult people, I just don't see how to even approach someone with that kind of mind - it doesn't follow the common sense logic. It's frustrating.
Ephemeron North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.02.02 21:44:00 - [7] As I said once before, but worth repeating - significant boost to tracking (50+ %) would treat the symptom but not the cause of the issue. Yes, blasters would become awesome. But then Autocannons would look like total crap. Then many other, new problems emerge due to unbalanced changing. Entering this pattern of problem-reaction would create a cascade of emerging problems. CCP have upset the established order in the game, they refuse to acknowledge their mistake. What they done in QR was wrong and uncalled for. All they had to do was change nanos from 15% to 10%. So simple, how did it go so wrong
Ephemeron North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.02.04 19:15:00 - [8] Truth be told, Void L is absolute crap when compared for faction Antimatter L. Before faction ammo was widely available, it was somewhat useful - in rare cases. But not now. I think devs should reduce the penalties of Void to make it more competitive. At same time, the price of faction ammo needs to triple
Ephemeron North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.02.05 19:53:00 - [9] Originally by: Bellum Eternus Originally by: Ephemeron Truth be told, Void L is absolute crap when compared for faction Antimatter L. Before faction ammo was widely available, it was somewhat useful - in rare cases. But not now. I think devs should reduce the penalties of Void to make it more competitive. At same time, the price of faction ammo needs to triple So true. Void's cap use is bad enough (horrific). It's tracking penalty is inexcusable. I say leave the cap use, up it's DPS output by about 30% and remove the tracking penalty. 30% damage increase combined with removal of tracking penalty is too much of a boost. The tracking penalty definitely needs to go, especially in light of QR patch changes. 10% damage increase would also be fine, to offset faction ammo. Definitely not 30 or 20% more tho.
Ephemeron North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.02.05 21:49:00 - [10] Originally by: Allen Ramses Pokes into the thread randomly Blasters can get fixed once missiles can get fixed. Otherwise, stop bumping this old and tired thread. I adapted (Granted I didn't enjoy it), so can you. Leaves as quickly as he arrives "Scratch my back I'll scratch your back, or we have no deal" - people like you need to die in a fire. Anyway, no semi-intelligent person would take you seriously.

Ephemeron North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.02.06 05:31:00 - [11] why, you are not satisfied with your mega pulse?

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.