|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 10:21:00 -
[1]
so an NPC corp hugging mission runner is practicaly immune to any PVP which isnt classed as greifing (he is gonna have to fly about 4 Billion fit to be worth a look at, and if its not for profit then its one expensive lul bucket)
wow. ****ing ace, no no no, really. nice one.
eve> going from shit to shita.
Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 10:26:00 -
[2]
Where the hell is the risk vs reward balance for mission runners?? Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 10:29:00 -
[3]
Originally by: copasetic sideways
Originally by: Sorted so an NPC corp hugging mission runner is practicaly immune to any PVP which isnt classed as greifing
or, you know, maybe go kill someone who's looking for a fight?
but then you'd be space dust, amirite?
and who the hell are you??
Eve is non-consentual PVP.
I suicde gank, gate camp and fight in small roaming gangs and have done ever since I started playing 3 years ago (if I even bother to log in anymore I would still be doing that)
I am not one of those many 0.0 chumps who fly following orders from their FC in a 100 man + gang. Camp gates/engage another 100+ gang listening for who to primary next then claim they are uber @ PVP.
If you find yourself in a fair fight you ****ed up. Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 10:34:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Sorted on 06/08/2008 10:35:20
Originally by: copasetic sideways
Originally by: Sorted and who the hell are you??
i'm the guy collecting your perfectly formed emo tears in a small glass jar and wonder just exactly how much low sec your corp has recently liberated.
wow - orgional...
check the KBs if your interested.
EDITL wow - smacktalking coward-alt guy - post with your main etc..(origional huh, u like that one?) Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 10:36:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Gul Rashen Suicideganking in High Sec was too easy, there was no risk and the reward was too high. This will be balanced now and thats all. No Hello Kitty. The PVP in EVE, Low Sec, 0.0, War Decs..will be the same after the changes.
mission running is just full of risk.... Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 10:40:00 -
[6]
Originally by: copasetic sideways
Originally by: Redback911 If you think PVP in EVE is about people looking for a fight, you are so so wrong.
look at my shocked little face!
pvp is where it's at, this i know - i just don't understand the mentality of the forum whining arschtards who insist that anyone they choose should be instantly accessible... it's nothing to get stressed about... move on, find anohter victim...
If they undock they should be accessible. End of.
currently war decs are broken (corp hopping is legal) NPC corps are a complete safe haven for the lazy (those that cba to corp hop) Suicde ganking is the only recourse against smacktalking tardmonkeys. Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 10:48:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Ki An
Originally by: Gul Rashen First, i live in Low Sec and am a PvP'ler I only run Missions to pay my Accounts with ISK.
That Missions are too easy is different Problem. But its in my interest that many ppl play EVE and its ok for me that they play it in a different way than i do. For the Missionrunners pimping their Ships is one of their goals in EVE. And why not? I like Ganking and i like PVP, but i don't like ganking without any risk and possibility for the victim to protct himself.
Saying that gank victims have no possibility of protecting themselves makes it painfully obvious you don't PvP, so stop lying about that.
The volume of suicide kills I have gotten from warping through that acceleration gate into a mission. watching the guy @45+K warp off, Warping to a close by planet myself and then back into the mission spot/gate only to see the guy land a few seconds later is staggering, but a fool and his isk are soon parted.
The runners have multiple ways to avoid suicde ganks, so too do the haulers.
in my experince most are too lazy or stupid to implement any of them tho.... Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 10:51:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Belmarduk "In addition, the highly requested feature of removal of insurance in CONCORD related events will be implemented in the near future."
This is good - Very good - As it should have been since the beginning, but not so sure about the rest... hm.
Bin all insurance and be done with it! Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 10:52:00 -
[9]
Originally by: FDUSPYZOR
It's cleart that CCP want a safer Eve.
urmm.. hence the thread? Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 10:54:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Gul Rashen
I talk about Suicideganking Missionrunners. What possibilities have they? Fly with cheap Fitting or stay on Station? Lol. And beware of saying that ppl are lying you don't know. Thats not nice and kiddielike.
plenty of options for runners.
Drop a can at the warp in point, move 30k from the can. Fly aligned. Use an alt to watch the entry gate. undock using an off grid undock insta to avoid scans., set the scanner to 1m KM and tap it occasionaly
the list goes on.
L2P Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 10:58:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Malcanis
Next up: war-decs.
what?? again?? lol they are already more impotent than a 90yr old man. Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 11:00:00 -
[12]
Originally by: hedfunk I suspect an avalanche of Low Sec Liberator posts! Where are you Skunk!?
damnit hedfunk. get ur whine on. Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 11:03:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Qui Shon
Oh, another newsflash, people loose ships to npc's *all* the time, even experienced runners, which invariably means there is risk in missionrunning even player pirates interfering. Despite what gankers like Ki or Sorted keep claiming.
without detailed numbers I still lean on the argument that if its not PVP and you lost your ship to anything other than a massive lag spike then you shouldnt be undocking it realy.
fitting uber tanks to compenstate for the lag tho, now thats a different issue.
clowns who cant fly, or protect themselves.. i think thats what we are discussing here.... Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 11:06:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Gul Rashen
Originally by: Sorted
plenty of options for runners.
1. Drop a can at the warp in point, move 30k from the can. 2. Fly aligned. 3. Use an alt to watch the entry gate. 4. undock using an off grid undock insta to avoid scans., 5. set the scanner to 1m KM and tap it occasionaly
1. See 3. 2. Only possible if you don't have to watch the distance to the NPC's (Cruise Missile-User) 3. Do they come through the Gate, when you get probed out? I don't know, wasn't ganked in Missions cause i use T2-Stuff. 4. signed 5. and? Then they can also watch the local. But you don't know who is a Ganker and who not.
so you havent been ganked, and never have ganked.. and your chirping up why?
3. Yes, of course. through the same gate you went through. use a back scout. (..waaaa.. i want to fly solo, well they have a few folk, so at least invest in an alt to protect ur multi billion mission ship) 5. (if you see a few ships within that range your in trouble)
and i repeat: so you havent been ganked, and never have ganked.. and your chirping up why? Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 11:07:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Delichon To the OP:
Welcome to the Hello Kitty Online. For free cake please proceed to the closest lowsec-to-0.0 bottleneck system. Faction fitted ships get a priority at cake-sharing. Enjoy your cake. Good bye.
nice corp.... Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 11:14:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Gul Rashen
Originally by: Sorted
3. Yes, of course. through the same gate you went through. use a back scout. (..waaaa.. i want to fly solo, well they have a few folk, so at least invest in an alt to protect ur multi billion mission ship)
OK, i didn't knew that. Some of my Informations only come through the Forums and Friends. And yes, i've never Ganked Missionrunners. It's not my Style. I like roaming Gangs more, more thrill.
how do you know. You have NEVER tried it.
wtfs up with you??
why are you here??? Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 11:32:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Qui Shon Edited by: Qui Shon on 06/08/2008 11:22:10
Originally by: Serj
Also you seem pretty fond of the sound your keyboard make 
Actually, I found this bog standard Dell OEM keyboard in a pile of unused stuff at work, and it has the most delightful feel and a nice sound too. I now like it more then any of the "pro" keyboards I've used over the years.
Hmm, have to post some more I think.
is this your main copasetic sideways.. is it? did you press the wrong button? SWEEEET. Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 11:36:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Malachon Draco And another change to make Eve more idiotproof.
Congrats. What's next? A ban on scamming and griefing people with wardecs?
Ya cant grief with war decs. they just hop corp..... Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 11:41:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Aaron Mirrorsaver so suicide ganking will have more penalties now and not be as carefree and there not as loved by griefers because it actually makes you KOS faster, and harder to regain that sec... boo hoo.
Its the standard over nerf,
Privs> 250 wars down to 4 Nano> lol 75% nerf on ma mach Ganking> need double the firepower, 60x the cost. increase in number in the loot split. Puts the "target" over 4Billion in fits to be viable. Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 12:35:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Qui Shon
Originally by: Sorted
is this your main copasetic sideways.. is it? did you press the wrong button? SWEEEET.
I've never used forum alts, outside the trade forums that is.
At a glance, I think I support the cheerful posting copasetic is doing though.
squirm....you little bastard  Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 13:32:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Brugar
Originally by: Vaal Erit
Originally by: Zaqar
Originally by: Vaal Erit 4) Future removal of insurance from suicide ganks = WTF NO. HELL NO.
Why? Why does it make sense that you should get an insurance payout?
Why shouldn't I get a payout. I can self-destruct my ship and get payout and suicide it into camps in 0.0. Empire corps don't trust 0.0 alliances so they shouldn't be giving out payouts to those people. Hell, if I am -10.0, they KNOW I am going to pirate in it and kill other pod-pilots so I shouldn't get insurance either.
It doesn't make sense with how EVE is made ingame and it doesn't make sense to only nerf one playstyle (suiciding) in regards to insurance. Insurance is for everyone and I can do anything, that's called sandbox gameplay that is advertised by CCP. I understand that a sandbox has rules, but insurance is one of those very basic rules that applies to everyone evenly. How about new rule: if you shoot at another player, your skill stops training for an hour.
No insurance company today or ever, does or will, pay out when an illegal activity is committed. By Concord being involved, it proves it is an illegal activity.
You think that just because this is a game, there isn't to be an intellegence or realismn of some sort?
Please.
It's about time this happens. Never made sense to actually make a profit on this.
RL referneces ftw, insurance companies shouldnt insure you for low sec or 0.0 or misson etcs who'd insure u in a warzone etc. Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 14:57:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Kelli Flay
Originally by: Steve Hawkings
Originally by: Kelli Flay
Originally by: Matrix Skye I love the whole "post with your main" crap . Tell you what, why dont you post with your real name and phone number. None of this hiding behind an avatar. That'll show us you're a REAL REAL man with very large *******. After all, it's about having guts, no? So go ahead
Actually, I think they should show up on my porch at my house and say it to my face. 
Yes, they are REAL brave gamers because they made a post with their corp ticker under it. 
I see angst ridden pre pubescent guy is still here fuming and hurling abuse, I suggest a cup of warm milk and a toss followed by a lie down.
Yes but you aren't still here stalking me and talking about me in some sexual context again.
It's okay that you are gay. Im not though...sorry.
who said anything about gay lol
you worrying about sommat? lol Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|

Sorted
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 10:09:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Sellyna ha ha ha this proves that CCP is startign to fail in creating eve- Welcome To WOw online! please CCP fire all the new creators!
i think "world of Spaceships" should catch on! Vote against the nano nerf! http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
|
|
|
|