| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Borat Sangdiev
   |
Posted - 2008.08.06 18:32:00 -
[1]
Since the new insurance changes are much lauded by the carebear community, CCP how about giving back something to the pvper's/gankers that make eve so great?
Let's remove insurance payouts on self destructs too. That way, ppl who self destruct instead of engage in a fight will now have to think twice.
No insurance companies pay you if you deliberately crash your car into something, afterall.
|
Malcanis
We are Legend
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 18:34:00 -
[2]
Agreed. At least has the merit of coherence.
My only problem with this idea is that it doesn't go far enough. If we're having realistic insurance in EvE, let's make it actually realistic.
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |
J Kunjeh
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 18:42:00 -
[3]
I support this as well, though I understand why it's in the game. They made it this way so that when you get locked into place by a griefer who has absolutely no intention of killing you, you can escape without an unfair penalty because of some griefer's actions.
|
Maximillian Bayonette
White Lion Manufacture and Salvage
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 19:34:00 -
[4]
If insurance is going to be realistic, it should be removed entirelly, but this is a good first step.
|
J Kunjeh
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 19:38:00 -
[5]
 Originally by: Maximillian Bayonette
If insurance is going to be realistic, it should be removed entirelly, but this is a good first step.
So how does removing it entirely make it realistic?
No, if it is to be realistic, then it needs to be turned over to player corporations to offer (or not) on the market.
|
Maximillian Bayonette
White Lion Manufacture and Salvage
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 19:41:00 -
[6]
Originally by: J Kunjeh
Originally by: Maximillian Bayonette
If insurance is going to be realistic, it should be removed entirelly, but this is a good first step.
So how does removing it entirely make it realistic?
No, if it is to be realistic, then it needs to be turned over to player corporations to offer (or not) on the market.
It's unrealistic in its current implementation. That was my point. It should either cover everything and be just a game mechanic like it used to be, or it should be completely realistic and function like a RL business.
|
Treelox
Market Jihadist Revolutionary Party
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 21:34:00 -
[7]
agreed
--
|
Elhina Novae
Amarr
Destruction Reborn
CORPVS DELICTI
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 22:46:00 -
[8]
/signed
Also remove insurance from any Global Criminals in 0.5 - 1.0 system only makes sense and will make gankers think twice.
------------
Somebody set up us the bomb |
Gone'Postal
Minmatar
Vengeance 8 Interceptors
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 22:48:00 -
[9]
Agreed, self destruct should NOT give insurance payout.
-V8I-
|
Solid Trust
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 22:53:00 -
[10]
great idea. this is a no brainer.
|
|
|
Antihrist Pripravnik
The 13th Gallentean Armed Response
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 23:14:00 -
[11]
agree
|
TornSoul
BIG
Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 23:25:00 -
[12]
Agreed
BIG Lottery |
Opertone
Caldari
SIEGE.
The Border Patrol
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 23:29:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Opertone on 06/08/2008 23:29:24
negative, you will have your friend blow up the ship to get money back! self destruct is mostly used in non combat situation in order to return part of the isk... blowing the ship up often gives more money than selling it on the secondary market.
|
Maijugs Arhueg
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 23:35:00 -
[14]
Stop whining and get more DPS.
|
Draygo Korvan
Merch Industrial
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 23:53:00 -
[15]
Yes I support this change. I would be glad to tackle people who have no way to kill me (and I have no way to kill them unless they log off) and just hold them there for hours as I taunt them in local. This would be totally awesome.
--
|
TheMailman
GreenSwarm
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 12:19:00 -
[16]
Edited by: TheMailman on 08/08/2008 12:19:23
Since you cannot fly against an asteroid in the game and lose the ship that way(fraud insurrance), the selfdestruct isk must remain. 
edit: Failtype |
Karentaki
Maximum Yarrage
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 14:38:00 -
[17]
/Supported
=============
RE: The suicide nerf
Originally by: agent apple
I believe I can safely speak for many of us when I say,
Dear Devs, Go Back to WOW
|
Foulque
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 14:56:00 -
[18]
|
Traidor Disloyal
NightCrew
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 16:43:00 -
[19]
I support this.
---------------------------------------------
Love is having a second account with a cov ops pilot |
Windjammer
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 19:54:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Draygo Korvan
Yes I support this change. I would be glad to tackle people who have no way to kill me (and I have no way to kill them unless they log off) and just hold them there for hours as I taunt them in local. This would be totally awesome.
You are perpetuating a stereotype of your alliance. 
Windjammer
|
|
|
Natalia Kovac
Phoenix Tribe
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 20:14:00 -
[21]
Oh agree mucho.
|
Riddick Valer
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 20:30:00 -
[22]
This idea makes sense.
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |