EVE Search - [MEGA THREAD] The Amarr problem

All Channels

Ships and Modules

[MEGA THREAD] The Amarr problem

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
SirDanceAlot	Posted - 2008.10.29 06:06:00 - [1] Originally by: Chronospin lol ! All we can say is that Amarr race sux big time. After all this years of domination over the Minmatars... Freakin band of whiners Maybe stay on topic and point out why the ships the OP mentioned are just fine?
SirDanceAlot	Posted - 2008.10.29 10:01:00 - [2] Originally by: Shira Rayborn Imo the omen is pretty darn crummy even after the so called boost. Yea, I can't belive it didn't get extra grid.
SirDanceAlot	Posted - 2008.10.29 13:36:00 - [3] Originally by: Evan Batarr Originally by: Angelic Eviaran Long Amarr whine OMG, you must be fecking joking. Amarr got boosted so badly they now rule. Have a look at Minmatar ships (especially AFTER the next nerf)and then tell me again that Amarr should be boosted even further. Just try to set up a decent Fleet Sniper (Locking & Shooting over 220 km and DD proof). What a ******ed post!!! So let's not fix broken things? It's like saying projectiles can never be broken because they have zero cap use wich is infinately less cap use then other turrets.
SirDanceAlot	Posted - 2009.01.03 18:04:00 - [4] I do wonder when they are fixing the 1 mid coercer and retri. It's a pretty daft construction.
SirDanceAlot	Posted - 2009.01.08 22:30:00 - [5] Originally by: Amira Shadowsong Originally by: Lucia Shak'ra A bad pilot blames his ships. Amarr are fine as they are. Do YOU fly these ships? It is easy to yap behind castle walls. This.
SirDanceAlot	Posted - 2009.01.09 02:35:00 - [6] Originally by: Amira Shadowsong Uhm wtf that list is such fail. Frigs: Rifter, Punisher, imo only rifter is any good. Destroyers: Thrasher, yes. but coercer is actually not bad except for the fail 1 mid. Cruisers: Rupture, Vexor, Thorax, Arby, yes. Id even add stabber and how the heck do you ignore blackbird? Fail. Battlecruisers: Hurricane, Harbinger (and Drake as an honorable mention), gallente also have the single best tier 1 BC and myrm isnt all that bad. Battleships: Abbadon, Armageddon, Dominix, Scorpion, Maelstrom (and yes, it actually is good, dispite any failings in its weapon system), wtf raven and PHOON?!?! Do you have the slightest clue about how good the phoon is? Assault Ships: Veng sucks. Period. Retri needs 2 mids. Minmatar and gallente own this ship class. EAS: Sentinel, Kitsune (with Hyena as an honrable mention). Interceptors: Crow, Crusader, Malediction (all races tackling inties are good, wtf forgotten stiletto? You fail), Taranis. Interdictors: Minmatar is the best one. Amarr one worst because rockets are THe worst weapons. Heavy Assault Ships: Zealot, Ishtar, Vagabond, Sacrilege. You ignored cerberus and eagle?! Do you even play this game? Heavy Interdictors: Broadsword, Devoter.....wtf what about ONYX? Logistics: uhm, for roams scimitar owns and for small gang lone armor repping oneiros owns with extreme ecm resistance. Your list fails. Recons: forgot QR Arazu Commands: All CS are good compared to eachother tbh. You got nothing on this shipclass. Marauders: Widow?! QFT!
SirDanceAlot	Posted - 2009.01.11 19:21:00 - [7] Originally by: Terianna Eri It really just needs a decent, but modest, chunk of powergrid and a little CPU and it would be a fine ship, a good stepping-stone between the punisher and the harbinger for people new to flying Amarr. This. It really needs a little fitting only and omen will be fine.
SirDanceAlot	Posted - 2009.01.12 00:22:00 - [8] Originally by: lecrotta Unfortunately they tend to focus on "fixing" the systems/ships they consider underpowered instead of fixing the obviously overpowered ones like no cap use on guns and extremely low fitting. Fixed.
SirDanceAlot	Posted - 2009.01.12 06:36:00 - [9] Edited by: SirDanceAlot on 12/01/2009 06:36:59 Originally by: lecrotta As soon as amarr BS have the same PG as gallente BS and blasters do not need cap you may have a point....... So it's not enough that gallente BS have best slot configuration, highest close range damage and tracking and biggest drone bays but you want amarr BS to have same PG as them aswell? Do you know the cap problems of abaddon? It is easy to compare like a moron and not look at the big picture of balance.
SirDanceAlot	Posted - 2009.01.12 15:40:00 - [10] Originally by: lecrotta Originally by: SirDanceAlot highest close range damage A bit higher in a insignificantly tiny window. 5km of gallente high dps vs 60+km of amarr high dps lol. I'm going to finish off your blatant lies with this little quote above. Please do show us this amarr BS that has insignificantly bit less dps then a blaster BS and at the same time has 60+km range of high dps. Show us the fits you are talking about. Show us the gallente BS that has only a bit higher dps in a insignificantly tiny window compared to the amarr BS that can hit 60+km range. Show us the amarr fit and the gallente fit. Please do and humor me.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.