| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nova Fox
Gallente
Novafox Shipyards
   |
Posted - 2008.08.18 21:38:00 -
[31]
Crystal Ball says 2009 probably around winter after a summer expansion adds in more trinity content, there have been content of planetary stuff every fanfest since that video. last one was great with a caldari tank and some atmospheric fighters. Eve art book also has abotu 4 pages on the same topic. So eve-onground is comming soon (tm)
remember crystal ball is mostly foggy and can only give results of something thats probabable. |
masternerdguy
|
Posted - 2008.08.18 22:28:00 -
[32]
 Originally by: Dirk Magnum
Please no. Planetary interaction will be a huge improvement to this game if you make it necessary for things like claiming sovereignty, certain industrial functions, and who knows what else. This requires months or years of pre-planning and testing to make it worthwhile.
Introducing planetary flight as a side-game where players can fight each other in an atmosphere is so monumentally cheap and pointless, not to mention a waste of time and resources, that it would seriously degrade CCP's reputation in my eyes. That's just one person's opinion, but I expect a lot of the people who make a game that has traditionally expected so much from its players.
im my opinion adding this to eve would open up a new level of fleet warfare. You could deploy snoop scan probes in the atmoshpere and hide your forces there. When the enemy gets close enough to the planet to plex or something or just regroup you can open a massive volley on em after warping to them. |
Derik Long
|
Posted - 2008.08.18 23:56:00 -
[33]
Only if it somehow contributes to the development of World of Darkness. |
Bluddwolf
Brutor tribe
|
Posted - 2008.08.19 01:01:00 -
[34]
I'm looking forward to the game moving in this direction. My only concern is that it might alter the nature of the EvE player base. I doubt there are very many kids (<15) playing this game. If CCP introduces avatar PvP, it might in fact attract the same low quality players found in all of the other MMos. |
The Blinded
GK inc.
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 12:46:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Bluddwolf
I'm looking forward to the game moving in this direction. My only concern is that it might alter the nature of the EvE player base. I doubt there are very many kids (<15) playing this game. If CCP introduces avatar PvP, it might in fact attract the same low quality players found in all of the other MMos.
Ahaha, have you seen CAOD lately? I doubt the player base mentality can sink any lower. |
Sheriff Jones
Amarr
Please Enter Password
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 12:51:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Chaos Incarnate
Originally by: Seeing EyeDog
Originally by: Ultin Harvor
Atmospheric flight and planets on the horizon?
why would you want something on the horizon, again? afaik, the horizon is asymptotic, you only get close, but never quite touch it.
You're really weird
Hey, let's face the facts here, it is a bit strange for someone with your appearance to go chewing the fat like that  |
Nova Fox
Gallente
Novafox Shipyards
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 23:39:00 -
[37]
I like bacon!
Anyways I hope they show off more planetary stuff this year after they get done toutingt the new walking in stations
New Ship Idea: Tender Supply Ship, The Logistics Sister |
Jiss Katcher
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 02:37:00 -
[38]
Originally by: NightmareX
Edited by: NightmareX on 18/08/2008 18:19:11
Originally by: Stab Wounds
atmospheric flight would ruin this game sorry. it's a space mmo not planet mmo.
I think peoples like you ruin the game more, because if it have been up to you to decide what's gonna be in this game, this would been a Drake / Raven Online or Carebear Online instead of EVE Online.
And lols at you for saying hahaha it's a space mmo, it's not a planet mmo. What the hell do you think the space have?, mmmmmmmm hamsters?, mmmmm cars?, mmmmmm or maybe planets?.
Wow, your so dumb it's actually funny.
Just be ****ing happy that CCP are developing this game more.
totally agree, i don't understand what all these naysayers get out of being so negative.
|
Rawr Cristina
Caldari
Omerta Syndicate
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 03:05:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Stab Wounds
atmospheric flight would ruin this game sorry
Why don't you cancel your 7 accounts over it? 
TBH what's there to ruin? EVE is so basic and mindless atm it's ridiculous. 90% of fights are fought sitting on Stargates. Combat is way too static - The tactics are the same. There's little or no tactical variation as far as combat environment goes; it's all just open space.
Change is a good thing. Atmospheric flight, along with the long-awaited Tactical Environments would, if implemented properly, do so much good for EVE it's almost shocking we don't have it yet.
- Infectious - |
Kyra Felann
Gallente
Noctis Fleet Technologies
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 07:02:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Stab Wounds
atmospheric flight would ruin this game sorry. it's a space mmo not planet mmo.
<sarcasm>
Any additions whatsoever to the game would ruin it. This game should remain exactly as it was at launch.
</sarcasm>
Also, learn how to use punctuation.
|
F'nog
Amarr
Celestial Horizon Corp.
Celestial Industrial Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 07:08:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Ultin Harvor
Who's to say that CCP haven't been thinking about it for ages already?
I'm to say that they've been thinking about it for at least 4 years, since they debuted the first planetary flight vids at the first Fanfest.
Originally by: Kazuma Saruwatari
F'nog for Amarr Emperor. Nuff said
Originally by: Chribba
Go F'nog! You're a hero! Not a Zero!  /me bows
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |