EVE Search - After ffive years CCP admit.

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

After ffive years CCP admit.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
kickemwhiletheyredown	Posted - 2008.08.20 08:01:00 - [1] After a normal petition, i get something that i never seen before and that worries me to such a extence i feel the public atleast should read the parts. my loss were only a shit ship this has notting to do with isk or ships, i had a question asked it and got this. And i quote. "There are countless other possible reasons for such disconnections, such as a large battle," So am i right to understand that CCP does INFACT not support large fleetbattles and if so, you had five years. Solve the problem, im not angry ;0)
kickemwhiletheyredown	Posted - 2008.08.20 08:01:00 - [2] After a normal petition, i get something that i never seen before and that worries me to such a extence i feel the public atleast should read the parts. my loss were only a shit ship this has notting to do with isk or ships, i had a question asked it and got this. And i quote. "There are countless other possible reasons for such disconnections, such as a large battle," So am i right to understand that CCP does INFACT not support large fleetbattles and if so, you had five years. Solve the problem, im not angry ;0)
Vaal Erit Science and Trade Institute	Posted - 2008.08.20 08:10:00 - [3] You bring so many "shit ships" to a fight that it lags out and the game is unplayable? CCP is doing what they can, but in the mean time how about you don't intentionally **** up the servers? Do your part.
kickemwhiletheyredown	Posted - 2008.08.20 08:20:00 - [4] Originally by: Vaal Erit You bring so many "shit ships" to a fight that it lags out and the game is unplayable? CCP is doing what they can, but in the mean time how about you don't intentionally **** up the servers? Do your part. Let me explain the ship was a normal recon and not a shit ship, but if you feel that im not doing my part, after paying for multiple accounts for five years. This was actuaaly the first time i saw ccp admitting to that in a petition. But if you feel the need to make C-0-c.k comment understand facts. and gtfo my thread.
Somealt Ofmine	Posted - 2008.08.20 08:24:00 - [5] Translation: Our game is busted. If we reimbursed everyone who lost a ship because our game is busted, our game would be even more busted. We don't want our game to get any more busted than it is. You aren't getting your ship back.
kickemwhiletheyredown	Posted - 2008.08.20 08:26:00 - [6] Originally by: Somealt Ofmine Translation: Our game is busted. If we reimbursed everyone who lost a ship because our game is busted, our game would be even more busted. We don't want our game to get any more busted than it is. You aren't getting your ship back. I do not at all care about the ship, i just really wanted CCP to reply and just confirm what their GM said in my petition. If so we have a totally new game here gents.
mechtech Entropy Death Squad	Posted - 2008.08.20 08:28:00 - [7] No, your thread is ridiculous. Of course CCP wants large fleet battles. Of course there is also a limit due to hardware that they can't do anything about. They have engineers working on rewriting the entire netcode, and are looking into utilizing infiniband, but come on, get real, they already have a world ranked supercomputer running eve. They also can't simply support or not support fleet battles. It's not black or white like you want. Sometimes 200 ships will be fine, sometimes 100 will lag horribly. You're just going to have to accept the fact that it's not crystal clear, and you won't ever get a crystal clear CCP response on the issue accordingly.
Somealt Ofmine	Posted - 2008.08.20 08:28:00 - [8] Originally by: kickemwhiletheyredown I do not at all care about the ship, i just really wanted CCP to reply and just confirm what their GM said in my petition. If so we have a totally new game here gents. This is old news bud. They've been denying petitions where the basis was lag or disconnection for a while now.
Reven Cordelle Caldari School of Applied Knowledge	Posted - 2008.08.20 08:31:00 - [9] Edited by: Reven Cordelle on 20/08/2008 08:31:55 I asked why objects in space don't do what they're supposed to. Spatial Rifts for instance. They just said it was because "some pilots have only been hurled through spatial rifts". Using that logic, we should be able to just fly past a blackhole in close proximity and be fine. Other pilots would get pulled into their base atoms, but we'll sit there fine... because its not FOR us. ******s I says. If they're going to bullshit in the item description about how awesome something is, dont just make it a shiny asteroid. Make it an actual spatial rift. Nevermind. I'm just skill training anyway. Havent actually flown in weeks. Edit: How is Bllocks filtered but Bullshit isnt? EVE is for mature adults, turn off this damn filter.
Phyrr Minmatar The Gosimer and Scarab	Posted - 2008.08.20 08:31:00 - [10] holy shit, shit isn't bleeped?
kickemwhiletheyredown	Posted - 2008.08.20 08:36:00 - [11] Originally by: mechtech No, your thread is ridiculous. Of course CCP wants large fleet battles. Of course there is also a limit due to hardware that they can't do anything about. They have engineers working on rewriting the entire netcode, and are looking into utilizing infiniband, but come on, get real, they already have a world ranked supercomputer running eve. They also can't simply support or not support fleet battles. It's not black or white like you want. Sometimes 200 ships will be fine, sometimes 100 will lag horribly. You're just going to have to accept the fact that it's not crystal clear, and you won't ever get a crystal clear CCP response on the issue accordingly. Quoting the GM from my petition once again for the really dumb people ;0) "There are countless other possible reasons for such disconnections, such as a large battle"
Somealt Ofmine	Posted - 2008.08.20 08:45:00 - [12] Originally by: Phyrr holy shit, shit isn't bleeped? No, it's not, but you should use it sparingly. It's a curse word, you know.
Lazuran Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2008.08.20 08:49:00 - [13] Edited by: Lazuran on 20/08/2008 08:49:32 Originally by: Phyrr holy shit, shit isn't bleeped? It's part of the new "cold, harsh EVE" initiative where ship reimbursement for losses due to crappy servers is denied too. ;-)
RaTTuS BIG Libertas Fidelitas	Posted - 2008.08.20 08:53:00 - [14] lag is not a re-imbuseable situation getting disconected is only re-imbursable if the hardware fails at their end
Crumplecorn Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations	Posted - 2008.08.20 09:13:00 - [15] Internet issues can cause disconnects. Ergo, CCP do not support the Internet. Ergo, EVE doesn't exist.
Zetjur Jilnou Rapid Deployment Industries	Posted - 2008.08.20 09:44:00 - [16] FOR FIFTEEN DOLLARS A MONTH I DEMAND CCP FIX THE INTERNET THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE
The TX Gallente Pulsar Combat Supplies Alternative Realities	Posted - 2008.08.20 10:09:00 - [17] Originally by: Zetjur Jilnou FOR FIFTEEN DOLLARS A MONTH I DEMAND CCP FIX THE INTERNET THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE
PsycheAnalyzer	Posted - 2008.08.20 10:21:00 - [18] There server's are GOD LIKE!
NeoTheo Dark Materials	Posted - 2008.08.20 10:22:00 - [19] YAWWWWN
Empress Norton	Posted - 2008.08.20 10:51:00 - [20] Originally by: Zetjur Jilnou FOR FIFTEEN DOLLARS A MONTH I DEMAND CCP FIX THE INTERNET THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE ^
linux4ever n0thing Inc. Systematic-Chaos	Posted - 2008.08.20 10:56:00 - [21] Why dont you post with your main op?
ImUrDestiny Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2008.08.20 11:57:00 - [22] Originally by: mechtech and are looking into utilizing infiniband, but come on, get real, they already have a world ranked supercomputer running eve. World ranked 5 years ago. Also, when i get a flat tire, i do not "look into it", i FIX the damn tire.
Neth'Rae Gallente Decorum Inc Tygris Alliance	Posted - 2008.08.20 12:00:00 - [23] Originally by: ImUrDestiny Originally by: mechtech and are looking into utilizing infiniband, but come on, get real, they already have a world ranked supercomputer running eve. World ranked 5 years ago. Also, when i get a flat tire, i do not "look into it", i FIX the damn tire. Comparing a server cluster to a tire = epic fail analogy..
Winterblink Body Count Inc. The Requiem	Posted - 2008.08.20 12:33:00 - [24] And then people wonder why CCP folks don't post regularly on the forums anymore. Oh gee maybe it has something to do with whatever they say getting picked apart and used as some sort of half-assed proof to someone's argument.
Spurty Caldari D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.20 12:55:00 - [25] Originally by: Winterblink And then people wonder why CCP folks don't post regularly on the forums anymore. Oh gee maybe it has something to do with whatever they say getting picked apart and used as some sort of half-assed proof to someone's argument. Quote of the week, good post! I support this meme
Murk Loar Caldari The Ex-Patriots	Posted - 2008.08.20 12:58:00 - [26] "There are countless other possible reasons for such disconnections, such as a large battle," Thats a pretty generalized comment really.It doesn't sound like an admission of 'we hate fleet battles' to me but Im not looking too far into it either. Have you ever thought that maybe it's your connection that cant handle 200+ ships on a grid and CCP are trying to open your eyes to other possibilities?Because if it was the CCP Superkomputer that couldnt handle large scale skirmishes,no one would be able to participate in one,and it seems like a good percentage of we players manage to.Just a thought.
Loyal Servant Caldari PURE Legion Pure.	Posted - 2008.08.20 13:38:00 - [27] Originally by: Murk Loar "There are countless other possible reasons for such disconnections, such as a large battle," Thats a pretty generalized comment really.It doesn't sound like an admission of 'we hate fleet battles' to me but Im not looking too far into it either. Have you ever thought that maybe it's your connection that cant handle 200+ ships on a grid and CCP are trying to open your eyes to other possibilities?Because if it was the CCP Superkomputer that couldnt handle large scale skirmishes,no one would be able to participate in one,and it seems like a good percentage of we players manage to.Just a thought. Ever observed how much bandwidth is consumed with 200 people on grid? It's not much.... a guy on a 56k modem can probably get by okay. It is not the bandwidth or the internet, its the delay between actions. Turn on a gun it starts firing 10 minutes later, etc etc. So, to sum it up: It is NOT the internet! it is processing power. If you cannot pan around then its your computer.... What they might be referring to in their 'comment' is that if there is a really large battle they might throw everyone off the node and restart it so they can dedicate more cpus to that system - thus reducing lag. You would be disconnected in that event.
Disteeler Perkone	Posted - 2008.08.20 13:58:00 - [28] Other mmos solve that with instances (look at AoC, it's a good laugh). Do you like instances? I prefer seamless worlds, as it seems CCP prefers too. The trade-off is EvE pushes technology to the max, but network tecnology is not capable of dealing with so much users in a same place. CCP at least tries, not like others.
kickemwhiletheyredown	Posted - 2008.08.20 14:06:00 - [29] Look now ... i think ccp are doing ok, and the game are awsome. but saying that i get disconnected due to fleet battles then not admitting to that fleetbattles actually are atm unplayable doesent mix.
Firkragg Blue Labs Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2008.08.20 14:30:00 - [30] 300man battles work fine, there arent many games were that holds true. And ccp are continously working to improve things allowing bigger and bigger fights. Year upon year ccp invest in new technology and spend alot of cash updating servers and code to improve performance and i, for one, am looking forward to the cluster developing into a true HPC cluster with the addition of infiniband which will finally remove the limitations of the one node per system setup.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.