| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Xavier Zedicus
   |
Posted - 2008.08.21 20:27:00 -
[31]
there IS no solution to the lag, because if they manage to make a system, say jita, less laggy, MORE people will come until the lag once again returns.
in the mean time, can i have your stuff? |
Tippia
Caldari
School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 20:27:00 -
[32]
 Originally by: Sheriff Jones
This is EVE--> (.Y.)
…exactly, so removing or changing any one part would just be wierd. And bad. And wrong.
|
Ruze
Amarr
No Applicable Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 20:28:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Banana Torres
Originally by: Helios III
It's like the ambulation debate:
They can't just take the people who are working on new content and put them on fixing lag.
Yep, but they could sack those without the required skills and use the money saved to employ those with the required skills.
Personally I think this would be a bad move, I am just pointing out the flaw in your argument.
In the same line of thought, though, 'more developers', just like 'more money', doesn't solve the problem in every case, or even in most cases.
Too many heads working on the same thing, and you end up witha bigger clusterf*ck than you had before.
Developers have stacking penalties too 
Quote:
If you like playing EvE, but don't like to PvP ...
Maybe it's time you recognize that you don't really like to play EvE.
|
J Kunjeh
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 20:29:00 -
[34]
It's not an either/or proposition, it's both/and.
|
Alora Venoda
GalTech
Giant Space Amoeba
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 20:30:00 -
[35]
it seems like lag is only a real problem in major trade hubs like Jita and large fleet battles. not everyone is so affected by it. many players do not engage in fleet battles, or have any desire to, regardless of lag.
If i could choose what CCP would focus on, then my vote would be for #3: bug fixes and improving the current content, especially the user interface.
~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~
Take away the risk and it would make flying around in space utterly pointless.
Take away the flying around part and you make EVE into a space themed spreadsheet application. |
Uncle Mo
Infusion.
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 20:30:00 -
[36]
2
|
Bob Stuart
D. S. Radioactive Sheep Farm
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 20:39:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Sheriff Jones
This dot is the crew working on tech--> ..
This is the crew working on graphics and other new content--> Y
This is the crew working on ambulation--> ()
This is EVE--> (.Y.)
Eve is boobs? 
Awesome! 
|
Faife
Minmatar
Kinda'Shujaa
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 20:43:00 -
[38]
posting in a "there is only one programmer at ccp" thread.
- -
|
Sheriff Jones
Amarr
Please Enter Password
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 20:44:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Tippia
Originally by: Sheriff Jones
This is EVE--> (.Y.)
àexactly, so removing or changing any one part would just be wierd. And bad. And wrong.
Very very wrong
Originally by: Bob Stuart
Originally by: Sheriff Jones
This dot is the crew working on tech--> ..
This is the crew working on graphics and other new content--> Y
This is the crew working on ambulation--> ()
This is EVE--> (.Y.)
Eve is boobs?
Awesome!
I'd say atleast if not more awesome then boobs
My opinions represent the opinions of my corporation completely. I'm the CEO damnit. |
Rostran Targo
Minmatar
Kinda'Shujaa
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 20:47:00 -
[40]
To us the soap has not yet come.
and now you are looking at my signature.
http://desusig.crumplecorn.com/sigs.html |
Spoon Thumb
Paladin Imperium
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 20:53:00 -
[41]
Why don't you take this to the CSM forum, then if you get enough popular support, ccp will take a look at it and you'll get a formal response?
_______
People like that don't have friends just temporary common interests.
Lag Guide
|
Bob Stuart
D. S. Radioactive Sheep Farm
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 21:05:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Sheriff Jones
I'd say atleast if not more awesome then boobs
"EVE: More Awesome Than Boobs"
Now THAT's an advertising slogan!
CCP take note!
|
Helios III
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 21:05:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Banana Torres
Originally by: Helios III
It's like the ambulation debate:
They can't just take the people who are working on new content and put them on fixing lag.
Yep, but they could sack those without the required skills and use the money saved to employ those with the required skills.
Personally I think this would be a bad move, I am just pointing out the flaw in your argument.
With the greatest respect: I said in my first post that they need that money to stay in new content or imo the game would die. You didn't quote that bit though...
|
Benedic
The Aftermath
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 21:11:00 -
[44]
Since CCP obviously has no one capable of fixing their awful netcode, they might as well focus on adding more frilly content.
|
Rhaegor Stormborn
Pestilent Industries Amalgamated
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 21:22:00 -
[45]
Fix Lag & Bugs. I don't need new content like Titans and Jump Bridges which have only ruined the game.
Rhaegor Stormborn
Fleet Admiral - Pestilent Industries Amalgamated |
nahtoh
Caldari
StrikerCorp
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 21:29:00 -
[46]
Edited by: nahtoh on 21/08/2008 21:30:33
Originally by: Lazuran
Originally by: Atreidai
#1
Because "fix lag" is a request similar to asking CCP to create their own global communication network, more efficient than the internet, with the sole purpose of transporting EVE data.
There is ping on the internet. There will always be lag. Whether it's server-side or not, there will be lag. People seem to think if they let the game stagnate/stop being fun, it will suddenly run perfectly .
I forgot to mention all the idiots who post in every thread about lag that the lag in EVE is the "Internet's" fault ...
And the idiots that disregard itas well ^
=========
"I am not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why can`t we just take the safety labels off everything and let the problem fix its self |
Vaal Erit
Science and Trade Institute
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 21:35:00 -
[47]
Originally by: FoxyVixen
Edited by: FoxyVixen on 21/08/2008 18:28:58
Edited by: FoxyVixen on 21/08/2008 18:26:58
as the title say, what do people want the most, CCP work on new expansions or that they work harder on fixing lag so people can enjoy a 150 vs 150 mans fight ....
You mean 300 vs 50 right? Come on, you want to pile in all of your thousands of friends vs whatever small gang you are up against. Now this is completely fine with numbers in 1-2 digits, but when you bring 500 shit fit ships, then you are pretty much purposely breaking the server.
I vote for fixing lag over new expansions like the Need for Speed campaign in 2007. Although from what I have read, there isn't a whole lot CCP can actually do with near 300+ on the same grid all shooting/moving/activating mods.
--
http://desusig.crumplecorn.com/sigs.html
|
Brigsby5987
Caldari
32nd Amarrian Imperial Navy Regiment.
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 21:59:00 -
[48]
HEY HERES AN IDEA, USE YOUR DAMN BRAIN.
They are working on it, rome wasnt built in a day.
Got something to say? Cancel your sub, otherwise stfu and wait like the rest of us.
__________________________________________
When Will I be able to post again ? 13 days, 23 hours, 55 minutes, 36 seconds |
Shardrael
Caldari
Titan Industries Technology Team
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 22:15:00 -
[49]
assuming life were as simple as the op seems to think and it was actually a choice between the two I would chose lag any day of the week.
sadly we dont live in that world and the two are not mutualy exclusive
|
Rakshasa Taisab
Caldari
Sane Industries Inc.
Ursa Stellar Initiative
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 22:27:00 -
[50]
The OP put forward a false dichotomy in order to troll us.
C/D?
|
Sharupak
Minmatar
Brutor tribe
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 22:31:00 -
[51]
New expansions
Lock it in!
_______________________________________________
RuntimeError: ChainEvent is blocking by design, but you're block trapped. You have'll have to find some alternative means to do Your Thing, dude. |
Eternum Praetorian
Tupperware Party
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 22:31:00 -
[52]
Edited by: Eternum Praetorian on 21/08/2008 22:32:12
MAYBE . . .
Something so the whole system doesn't have to restart to the log-in screen when you DC.
Thats only mildly related I know and not very constructive . . .
|
Jimer Lins
Gallente
Federation Fleet
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 22:48:00 -
[53]
False binary thinking.
They're working on both.
|
Niccolado Starwalker
Shadow Templars
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 23:38:00 -
[54]
Originally by: Modrak Vseth
Originally by: FluterEx
i personally go for Nr. 1 because lag will never be fixed. Its just not possible. If CCP implements something that reduces lag, the ppl will just take more ships into fleet battles until it starts lagging again. If you died in a fleetbattle because of lag thats your own fault.
This TBH.
So do I. People are simply too "lemmings".
Originally by: Dianabolic
Your tears are absolutely divine, like a fine fine wine, rolling down your cheeks until they flow down the river of LOL |
Nova Fox
Gallente
Novafox Shipyards
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 23:43:00 -
[55]
I vote for both!
oh one more thing
bad foxie <^-^> grrr!
New Ship Idea: Tender Supply Ship, The Logistics Sister |
sableye
principle of motion
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 23:56:00 -
[56]
if they could fix lag don't you think they would have already and putting more mrn on the job probably won;nt help plus alot of the people who make content probably could contribute zero to lag reducing.
Join The Fight With Promo Today
View The North Star! |
lucy9
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 23:56:00 -
[57]
Originally by: FoxyVixen
1. EXPANSION
2. LESS LAG
3. Dump this stupid game and start on a new MMO all about vampires or something
Added 3 for any Devs who want to vote. Mwuhuhuhu. 
|
Sheerborn
Minmatar
Angel of War
Send More Paramedics
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 00:28:00 -
[58]
! and not @
-----------
Evil is a point of view. God kills indiscriminately and so shall we. For no creatures under God are as we are, none so like him as ourselves.
----------- |
Rakshasa Taisab
Caldari
Sane Industries Inc.
Ursa Stellar Initiative
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 08:07:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Jimer Lins
False binary thinking.
They're working on both.
It's called a False Dichotomy actually...
|
Tippia
Caldari
School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 09:18:00 -
[60]
Originally by: Rakshasa Taisab
The OP put forward a false dichotomy in order to troll us.
C/D?
C
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |