EVE Search - Thoughts on a Thanatos setup

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Thoughts on a Thanatos setup

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Evanade Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.29 13:09:00 - [1] Edited by: Evanade on 29/08/2008 13:10:13 I'd go for 1x armor 1x shield rr as there are alot of phoenices and chimeras around. Would also ditch the explosive hardener for a cap power relay. Explosive damage is hardly used by dreads (only nag fires it by default, but not even 35% of its dps, and phoenix is very unlikely to use anything except kinetic anyway) And ditch one repper for a dcu. EHP will ave you in a cap fight, sustained tank will not, as opposed to sustained RR. --------------------------- sok alt - main got banzored
Evanade Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.29 22:15:00 - [2] get rid of one rep and fit a cpr, you need alot more cap to sustain the rr --------------------------- sok alt - main got banzored
Evanade Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.30 08:31:00 - [3] Edited by: Evanade on 30/08/2008 08:40:28 Actually not. He's talking about a big fleet for support, which makes his localtank irrelevant, and his rr capabilities much needed. RR takes lots of cap, so best fit for it. Originally by: Wil Smithx Originally by: Evanade get rid of one rep and fit a cpr, you need alot more cap to sustain the rr Did you read this whole thread at all?! and damn thats a bad idea, you will get taken down by a single BS, you need to be able to tank a ***ing lot more than that. By your train of thoughts, a dualrep setup could be killed by two* battleships..ohnoes! You are radiating lethal doses of inexperience in all directions. Yes i did read the whole thread, i even made recommendations earlier on that were ignored by all of you, and if you knew me you'd know why probably shouldn't have. --------------------------- sok alt - main got banzored
Evanade Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.30 13:37:00 - [4] Originally by: XEN0CIDE You need a Damage Control because like Amarr, Gallente do have some buffer in Structure. So this may allow you to jump out. I personnally dont use a Thanatos because a Moros is just so much better. Get a Moros. 5 Orge II with 200% Drone Bonus = This just in, carriers primary role is not dps. --------------------------- sok alt - main got banzored
Evanade Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.30 14:22:00 - [5] Third rr on thanatos is possible, for example 2x armor 1x shield, but you will need to gear the entire fit for maximum cap recharge to sustain them for any reasonable amount of time. No use for a third repper when you cap out after three minutes. --------------------------- sok alt - main got banzored
Evanade Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.30 20:40:00 - [6] Shield tank on a thanny is possible but not really realistic. The guy who advocated drone control units in his highslots obviously has no clue on how to use carriers. --------------------------- sok alt - main got banzored
Evanade Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.30 20:41:00 - [7] Originally by: Kusariqqu Edited by: Kusariqqu on 30/08/2008 19:24:51 Sorry mate but which carrier pilot in there right mind engages a dreadnought alone?? no 1 idiot. If you have fighters 5 which i do and carrier 5 the extra DPS is a nice bonus but i would only recomed on a thanaots. And shit ever herd of 12 neut drones??? thats 300 neut capacity every 6 seconds and they cycle 4 times in the time it takes for the hvys to cycle once and doing thr extact same amount. That will mess up that perrun dread u like to freely enage. You have no clue, do you? Carrier dps is totally insignificant and the setup you proposed does not have the cap needed to perform it's primary role, logistics. --------------------------- sok alt - main got banzored
Evanade Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.30 21:23:00 - [8] You could fit a third rr and be 50% more useful to your fleet. DCU's are fail and have no place on a pvp carrier. You will also need additional cap over 'permarunning' because it will often be at less then optimal after you've just jumped, or when you are being neuted. You also want a damage control for the additiona HP and ditch the second repper for a CPR. --------------------------- sok alt - main got banzored
Evanade Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.30 21:29:00 - [9] An addiotional fail is the fact that you used smc's on a cap ship. You want both a quick recharge alot of recharge, and in both cases, ccc's fare better. 'Buffer' cap has little use on capital ships. --------------------------- sok alt - main got banzored
Evanade Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.31 08:30:00 - [10] Originally by: Atsuko Ratu Originally by: whisk for the main job carrier made for? yes fail attempt to troll Gotta admit, I was prepared to handle a well thought out and math assisted post on why 10 carriers, all with 3 RR instead of 2 RR and a SB, would be more effective at reducing damage. You disappointed me epically. you expect too much from people ;) --------------------------- sok alt - main got banzored
Evanade Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.31 16:18:00 - [11] Edited by: Evanade on 31/08/2008 16:27:41 drone control is fail, damage control is mandatory on nid/thanny/archon --------------------------- sok alt - main got banzored
Evanade Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.31 16:30:00 - [12] Originally by: Atsuko Ratu I fit my Thanatos with the following: 6x Shield Power Relay 5x Shield Recharger 5x DCU 3x Shield Purger rigs lol lol troll troll --------------------------- sok alt - main got banzored
Evanade Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.31 17:55:00 - [13] Edited by: Evanade on 31/08/2008 17:55:01 Originally by: Atsuko Ratu Edit: Sok alt, what what? i got banned for laughing at nc hypocrisy on coad ^^ --------------------------- sok alt - main got banzored
Evanade Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.31 18:03:00 - [14] Edited by: Evanade on 31/08/2008 18:05:04 20 more days after bob smoked three nc motherships that were sieging a pos of ours, some nc guy posted this: ''There s no need for smack. It is natural for weaker entities to group up in order to try and defeat a stronger, more powerful enemy. It s flattering really.'' so i was liek 'LAWL' and posted that a few times too many :P --------------------------- sok alt - main got banzored
Evanade Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.31 18:33:00 - [15] Edited by: Evanade on 31/08/2008 18:35:30 Originally by: Cheenie Lol Sokratesz is like the worst person to listen to on Capital Fits, argues stupid points against people that have more experience than him along with completly turncoating on opinions like rigs on Dreads, lol @ arguing against all the experienced Dread pilots telling them to use 3 CCC's cus you can totally tank 30 Dreads shooting you better with 3 CCC's than 3 Trimarks. You must not have followed me for quite some time I admit that my initial take on dreads (phoenix, mostly) turned out not to be the 'best' when it comes to large scale warfare but it still has some merit in other circumstances. You can thank Ms. Palli from BDCI for educating me on these matter. --------------------------- sok alt - main got banzored
Evanade Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.31 18:53:00 - [16] Originally by: Cheenie You post in every capital thread that exists, the forum's bored of you and your changing opinions. i guess the massive outcry against me mustve helped then, cause i got banned --------------------------- sok alt - main got banzored

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.