Again, in something vaguely resembling English please?

But seriously, I don't see how you can tell people what they should be doing or finding fun

Wall of Text!

A) more convenient.
B) more accessable to younger gankers
C) more profitable.

1. Income for Pod Killer]

2. Orca 'Stealth' Cargo Bay nerf

Granted, sounds like you are going to have this 'fixed' with Crimewatch safety condoms for carebears.

Thankfully I saved the second post, before Tanya Powers' special brand of re-tarded started shitting up the first page. Not many worthwhile assets in lowsec, sorry. You miss the point, as usual. Blowing up T1 insured, 2M ISK Rifters and 25M ISK Drakes in lowsec is simply a waste of time - when the high-ISK, uninsurable fat targets are in sitting in highsec.

Most of these ideas are from Herr Wilkus (or others on C&P), but he/she/it is cool with me posting them. Mainly looking for other good, well thought out ideas, front and center.

I'm sure there are other improvements to ganking mechanics could be brought to CCP's attention - ideas that ring in a new golden era of high-sec wanton destruction.

I'm an optimist. I believe our brightest days are ahead of us, not behind us.

Here is the important bit though:
I've killed hundreds of Exhumers. You know what I've noticed about my favorite icebelt hunting grounds?

Miners are FEWER.....but those left ARE LEARNING TO TANK! Its amazing. As a result - have to leave many of them alone, as I don't have sufficient firepower to take them solo. Tornado is good, but can't do everything.

Further, they are ORGANIZING. Doing everything they can to make my life more difficult, warn the 'non-botting' Exhumers in local, and impede my attacks and looting. And I say, good for them!

Its exactly what EVE is about, even in highsec. I'll still smack and local and harvest as many bots as I can, but it keeps me interested because they make it challenging...! Worst thing CCP could do, is just step in and let them all go back to tanking with Cap Recharger II's and mining AFK.

Then I guess Suicide Gankers wont have any complaints about adapting to a situation where they might be at least be equally challenged for their behaviour? Why should they be removed from the adaptation and evolution equation or risk vs reward considerations. You want to prescribe to others how to play yet when the shoe is on the other foot its a complete injustice.

I think the stock answer or appropriate responce in these situations "HTFU" or "Adapt or Die"?

Thankfully I saved the second post, before Tanya Powers' special brand of re-tarded started shitting up the first page.

This is EVE - it's harsh. Deal with it.

'And if CCP says it's not, and want to change it, we will whine until it is', you should add.

Funny how "pvpers" pictures their own opinion about what Eve is even above CCP itself.

Good job. You managed to break up to 1/4th of this forum's rules of conduct in your very first sentence. That takes skill.

EVE is a PVP based game. Its economy relies upon the destruction of player created assets. Even if you're a miner, you're still participating in/fueling PVP in a way.

I suppose you think that CCP doesn't want its game to be harsh?

Beyond 'ship loss' however, there is a great deal of uncertainty involved. Ganks fail all the time.

-You may fail to kill the target, and get a big 'lol' in local, and lose the ship anyway.
-The loot you are attempting to steal fails to drop, which costs you ISK and time.
-The loot you are attempting to steal is stolen by someone else, which costs you ISK, time and sucks as well.
-Your -10 ganking alt (and POD!) can be jammed, scrammed, neuted or popped by any bystander, at any point in the process.

And of course, naturally, we generally only punish the carebears that are guilty of gross negligence.
-Failing to tank a 250M Exhumer.
-Hauling hundreds of millions or billions in a T1 Industrial.....AFK.

Most of the carebears, despite posting garbage on here, are probably bright enough to avoid being ganked, simply because they bother to read these forums and (possibly) apply what they learn here to their game.

Here is the important bit though:
I've killed hundreds of Exhumers. You know what I've noticed about my favorite icebelt hunting grounds?

Miners are FEWER.....but those left ARE LEARNING TO TANK! Its amazing. As a result - have to leave many of them alone, as I don't have sufficient firepower to take them solo. Tornado is good, but can't do everything.

Further, they are ORGANIZING. Doing everything they can to make my life more difficult, warn the 'non-botting' Exhumers in local, and impede my attacks and looting. And I say, good for them!

Its exactly what EVE is about, even in highsec. I'll still smack and local and harvest as many bots as I can, but it keeps me interested because they make it challenging...! Worst thing CCP could do, is just step in and let them all go back to tanking with Cap Recharger II's and mining AFK.

EVE is a PVP based game.

1. no reward from podding? other than tears? That's the whole point of podding is to further inconvenience the loser. Its implant destruction is just extra tears. No transferring such assets ever. If you cant unplug without destroying the chip, then you shouldn't be able to loot it. If this ever happens, then everyone should be able to biomass a jumpclone for a fee and recollect all their implants.

2. No problem with making everything scannable and show up in kills.

3. Current amount of time is just fine. Its evident in the ganks every day. If your internet sucks. Deal with it~

4. Fanfest has shown plans for a Pop-up aggression lock or unlock. So players who want to gank don't have extra clicks. and those who don't want to accidentally do anything illegal physically cant miss click

People at fanfest has good ideas for pirates. and sec status. Current plan was you can regain sec status killing -5 and below players but an idea was -5 and below players should get some kind of reward for killing +5 players. Such as Pirate LP. This should also work with gankers.

But why when they can cry and whine on the forums about how they should be able to rob candy from babies with no real recourse...