| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Markus Reese
Debitum Naturae
ROMANIAN-LEGION
110
   |
Posted - 2012.04.05 18:19:00 -
[31] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:
I also hope they expand the gap in profit between high sec incursions and low sec. From what I've heard the increased hassle and time wasted due to hostiles renders low sec incursion running on the whole pointless. Or at best less profitable than high sec.
That is quite correct. In terms of lowsec, it is possible to keep a low profile with the vanguard fleets. 10 man fleets for them are not that big of a deal and the sites are short enough you can run and keep safe with it not being a big deal. Getting into the larger sites is not worth it for non sov space. Large fleets and the time needed for the major sites is just asking for a gank fleet. |
Josef Djugashvilis
The Scope
Gallente Federation
74
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 18:27:00 -
[32] - Quote
Andski wrote:oust Incursion Bob, the prophet of the incursion runners who styles himself as "Ammzi" and makes really bad posts about the mittani because he dares question the risk/reward balance across the game
Your portrait - to hide the goon tears?
You want fries with that? |
Sirinda
Lead Farmers Academy
Kill It With Fire
66
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 18:27:00 -
[33] - Quote
Why not call the guy Incursion Iggy? Would make more sense. |
Torneach
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
18
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 18:30:00 -
[34] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:As long as profit goes "high > low > null > whs" I'm happy.
I think you got that backwards. I really hope by accident.
|
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
487
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 18:32:00 -
[35] - Quote
Torneach wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:As long as profit goes "high > low > null > whs" I'm happy. I think you got that backwards. I really hope by accident.
Heh, yeah, my bad 
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |
Torneach
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
18
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 18:37:00 -
[36] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Torneach wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:As long as profit goes "high > low > null > whs" I'm happy. I think you got that backwards. I really hope by accident. Heh, yeah, my bad
Oh, OK, good. 
|
Raven Ether
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
131
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 18:44:00 -
[37] - Quote
**** incursions and incursion farmer scrubs. |
Richard Aiel
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
124
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 18:57:00 -
[38] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Richard Aiel wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:
After incursions are nerfed, they will then go after wh's, then level 4's (againandagainandagain...).
Because "you're not playing their way".
yes its only THEIR sandbox not YOUR sandbox #1 - LTQuote, m'kay? #2 - I wasn't talking about CCP, instead all the whiners who for years (at least since I joined in 2008) have been complaining that "hi-sec makes too much, with too little risk", and the corollary whiners that "Low-Sec" or "Null-Sec" is empty.
#1 train sarcasm to 5 or are you ne of those that dont pick it up unles sthey put
(sarcasm) into the post?
Nirnias Stirrum wrote:Well if CCP want to in anyways keep with a realistic timeline and story line, incursions will be gone soon.. i mean 1 nation can only invade an entire empire for so long before both running out of men and spaceships..
So heres hoping incursions will end with the coming of Inferno!
Jove steps in and steps ON them
Ravan Hekki: "Well done CCP. Banned tears the best sort of tears."
especially Goon tears
|
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
135
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 19:31:00 -
[39] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:
Obligatory umadbro.
Want to make loads of isk as part of a fleet? Try wormholes, or is actually losing your ship if you're careless too great a burden to bear?
I hope CCP adds Sleeper incursions which drop ribbons into Hi Sec & NULL to spread the wealth  In the very least if CCP is serious about putting the economy in players hands blue loot from sleeper wrecks should be eliminated just like all other NPC buy orders to fix the ISK sink issues creating run away inflation
An' then [email protected], he come scramblin outta the
Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's-á
crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'-á |
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
490
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 19:34:00 -
[40] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:
Obligatory umadbro.
Want to make loads of isk as part of a fleet? Try wormholes, or is actually losing your ship if you're careless too great a burden to bear?
I hope CCP adds Sleeper incursions which drop ribbons into Hi Sec & NULL to spread the wealth In the very least if CCP is serious about putting the economy in players hands blue loot from sleeper wrecks should be eliminated just like all other NPC buy orders to fix the ISK sink issues creating run away inflation
Good thing CCP don't listen to bad poasters.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
135
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 22:18:00 -
[41] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:
Obligatory umadbro.
Want to make loads of isk as part of a fleet? Try wormholes, or is actually losing your ship if you're careless too great a burden to bear?
I hope CCP adds Sleeper incursions which drop ribbons into Hi Sec & NULL to spread the wealth In the very least if CCP is serious about putting the economy in players hands blue loot from sleeper wrecks should be eliminated just like all other NPC buy orders to fix the ISK sink issues creating run away inflation Good thing CCP don't listen to bad poasters.
lol I must be a good poster then... I'm pretty sure I know how CCP is going to speed up the Assaults ( involves NCNs ) and I've been pretty critical about the Assualts and how they need more luvin' in the forums.
And speaking of bad posters sure looks like CCP was listening to them when they threw mittens under the bus
An' then [email protected], he come scramblin outta the
Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's-á
crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'-á |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |