Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Faekurias
Black Legion Command
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 22:58:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Faekurias on 11/09/2008 23:00:09 Send me information using EvE-mail or By posting here please. Thank you. I am using This map to help me. Also this very forum (CAOD). I am also using: This Outpost alert. Hope it's ok you guys. Thanks to Verite and Serenity Steele.
Current Campaigns And Wars:
The MAX Campaign :
In the North There is a War between the GBC and the Nothern Coalition, where the GBC is at a definite advantage currently, having all but subdued (it would seem)the Imperial Republic of The North, of the NC. Entities At War GBC Led by Band of Brothers/Executive Outcomes - versus - The Northern Coalition Led by Morsus Mihi/Razor Alliance. Most of the previous residents space has been gained by The Church, Axiom Empire and Band of Brothers.
In the North-East: Triumvirate- versus - The Northern Coalition, and has thus far beaten back HYDRA Alliance to a scrap of their space, taking some over. Triumvirate seems outnumbered, but with a superior will to fight, gaining them an advantage.
In the South: Against ALL Authorities - versus - Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate(IAC are backed by atleast Liberty.). Againt ALL authorities seem to have been gaining a new active ally in Goonswarm recently. If any confirmations can be had, give them please. Against ALL Authorities seem to be at a large advantage currently.
------------------ We are recruiting.
|

Faekurias
Black Legion Command
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 22:58:00 -
[2]
Reserved. ------------------ We are recruiting.
|

Faekurias
Black Legion Command
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 22:58:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Faekurias on 11/09/2008 23:00:09 Send me information using EvE-mail or By posting here please. Thank you. I am using This map to help me. Also this very forum (CAOD). I am also using: This Outpost alert. Hope it's ok you guys. Thanks to Verite and Serenity Steele.
Current Campaigns And Wars:
The MAX Campaign :
In the North There is a War between the GBC and the Nothern Coalition, where the GBC is at a definite advantage currently, having all but subdued (it would seem)the Imperial Republic of The North, of the NC. Entities At War GBC Led by Band of Brothers/Executive Outcomes - versus - The Northern Coalition Led by Morsus Mihi/Razor Alliance. Most of the previous residents space has been gained by The Church, Axiom Empire and Band of Brothers.
In the North-East: Triumvirate- versus - The Northern Coalition, and has thus far beaten back HYDRA Alliance to a scrap of their space, taking some over. Triumvirate seems outnumbered, but with a superior will to fight, gaining them an advantage.
In the South: Against ALL Authorities - versus - Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate(IAC are backed by atleast Liberty.). Againt ALL authorities seem to have been gaining a new active ally in Goonswarm recently. If any confirmations can be had, give them please. Against ALL Authorities seem to be at a large advantage currently.
------------------ We are recruiting.
|

Faekurias
Black Legion Command
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 22:58:00 -
[4]
Reserved. ------------------ We are recruiting.
|

Faekurias
Black Legion Command
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 22:59:00 -
[5]
reserved. ------------------ We are recruiting.
|

Faekurias
Black Legion Command
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 22:59:00 -
[6]
reserved. ------------------ We are recruiting.
|

EzSnake
Brass Monkeys Society
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 23:03:00 -
[7]
Outbreak & Evoke vs Daisho & KIA Not sure whose winning this...E&O claim it's not over SOV but then again supposedly attackin cyno jammers etc. Either way it's a war worth mentioning I guess
|

EzSnake
Brass Monkeys Society
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 23:03:00 -
[8]
Outbreak & Evoke vs Daisho & KIA Not sure whose winning this...E&O claim it's not over SOV but then again supposedly attackin cyno jammers etc. Either way it's a war worth mentioning I guess
|

Faekurias
Black Legion Command
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 23:07:00 -
[9]
Originally by: EzSnake Outbreak & Evoke vs Daisho & KIA Not sure whose winning this...E&O claim it's not over SOV but then again supposedly attackin cyno jammers etc. Either way it's a war worth mentioning I guess
Thank you! ------------------ We are recruiting.
|

Helen
coracao ardente Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 23:37:00 -
[10]
Originally by: EzSnake Outbreak & Evoke vs Daisho & KIA Not sure whose winning this...E&O claim it's not over SOV but then again supposedly attackin cyno jammers etc. Either way it's a war worth mentioning I guess
What is this dumb day?
Attacking cyno jammers and pos gets you fights. Sometimes people won't defend/attack until you hit a pos. It's only about sov when they bring in dreads and actually siege pos and take space.

|

Murtala
Mushin Market
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 00:10:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Faekurias Edited by: Faekurias on 11/09/2008 23:59:45
Send me information by using EvE-mail or posting here please. Thank you. I am using This map to help me. Also this very forum (CAOD). I am also using: This Outpost alert. Hope it's ok guys. Thanks to Verite and Serenity Steele.
Current Campaigns And Wars: Aggressors are Left-hand side. The MAX Campaign :
In the North there is a War between the "GBC" and The Northern Coalition, where the GBC is at a definite advantage currently, having all but subdued (it would seem)the Imperial Republic of The North, of the "NC". Entities At War GBC are led by Band of Brothers/Executive Outcomes - versus - The Northern Coalition Led by Morsus Mihi/Razor Alliance. Most of the previous residents space has been gained by The Church, Axiom Empire and Band of Brothers. The Agressors are currently sieging PURE.
In the North-East: Triumvirate- versus - The Northern Coalition, and has thus far beaten back HYDRA Alliance to a scrap of their space, taking some over. Triumvirate seems outnumbered, but with a superior will to fight, gaining them an advantage.
In the South: Against ALL Authorities - versus - Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate(IAC are backed by atleast Liberty.). Againt ALL authorities seem to have been gaining a new active ally in Goonswarm recently. If any confirmations can be had, give them please. Against ALL Authorities seem to be at a large advantage currently.
nice work with all the pretty colours
. . and war summaries are not bad either
|

Audrea
Omega Fleet Enterprises Executive Outcomes
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 01:44:00 -
[12]
Nicely done with the formatting, keep it up :)
Hope it grows into more detailed reports, with links etc.
Looking forward to see how PL's revenge thing turns out 
|

Rehmes
Minmatar RillaCorp Executive Outcomes
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 01:58:00 -
[13]
Dot forget SOLAR and Legion have pretty much taken over what IRON had in the drone regions, IRC has also been involved IIRC. ***Where am I?*** |

SnowUponPetal
Best Path Inc. Ethereal Dawn
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 02:02:00 -
[14]
Thanks for giving a summary of the current conflicts a go. This is useful in the absence of updates to Joshua Fortrain's manual powerbloc map!
My 2 cents:
(What used to be) Hydra and the Triumvirate offensive against the NC is in the North, not the North-East. The North-East is the home of the Drone Region alliances, where there has recently been an offensive by Legion of xXDeathXx, SOLAR FLEET, Intrepid Crossing, and Ethereal Dawn against Imperial Republic of the North. That campaign ended last week with the removal of IRON from the area.
If two campaigns involving the same alliance are taking place in the same area, you may as well call them one campaign. For example, the NC is effectively fighting both GBC and Triumvirate in the North. BoB has taken of an outpost in Vale of the Silent and Triumvirate have noted the proximity of BoB's MAX cap fleet to Tri holdings should the NC counter-attack there. Whether this alignment of GBC and Tri is coincidental or by design has no bearing on an objective list of forces and campaigns.
On that point, try to separate events from propaganda. You write that: "Triumvirate seems outnumbered, but with a superior will to fight, gaining them an advantage". Triumvirate likely sees things this way, but the NC's side of the story probably is different. Since the NC has a posting ban, you're not going to get both sides in CAOD. It would be more effective to write, "Triumvirate is engaged in an offensive against the Northern Coalition in Vale of the Silent. Triumvirate leaders ascribe their advantage to a superior will to fight. The NC has made no comment on the situation."
Good luck in your campaign summaries!
|

Norwood Franskly
Minmatar Fleet of the Damned Dark Trinity Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 02:12:00 -
[15]
From my point of view in the South the fighting is between AAA and UNL (though mainly AAA) vs IAC + CVA and the other providence alliances (Liberty, Paxton and Slyph etc). The fighting has been around Catch and Providence regions, though there have been some small fights in Immensea.
There have been fights in XD- (Immensea) and in Providence. IAC and co are on the defensive at the moment and I think AAA are concentrating on towers in Catch at present. Someone else who is more involved could give you better info, those are just my impressions from flying around the area (blue to IAC)...
|

Fitz VonHeise
The New Order.
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 02:17:00 -
[16]
Edited by: Fitz VonHeise on 12/09/2008 02:19:52
Very nice list.. (And you have lots of color there too) 
|

Easley Thames
The Maverick Navy Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 02:33:00 -
[17]
As for the AAA v. IAC campaign you could either put UNL as a AAA ally or you could list IAC v. UNL as a seperate campaign. In my opinion it makes more sense to list them as an ally of AAA but that is for them to clarify.
As for Goons it would make sense to add them as a AAA ally in the conflict against us since AAA and Goons are blue to each other and fighting the same enemy.
You could also list CVA + Paxton + Sylph v. AAA as a seperate campaign or you could group them together with IAC.
You could also potentially create a TCF v. AAA campaign since they are hostile and there has been at least one engagement (titan trap). Maybe it's too presumptious at this point though.
|

Jack Gilligan
THE MuPPeT FaCTOrY KIA Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 02:36:00 -
[18]
AAA only helps UNL (they are actually red to each other normally) when IAC tries any offensive against UNL.
My opinions are my own and do not necessarily represent those of my corp or alliance. |

Orar Ironfist
Digital assassins
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 03:42:00 -
[19]
Wow goodjob actually.
|

Alaxen
Caldari Eve Defence Force Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 05:36:00 -
[20]
AAA's offensive against IAC seem to be supported by 'Kingdom Of Butan' (whoever they are).
|

Graalum
Interstellar eXodus R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 06:10:00 -
[21]
Edited by: Graalum on 12/09/2008 06:11:06 i swear i posted in this thread.
*WERE THE **** DID MY OPST GO FFS*
|

Loike
coracao ardente Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 06:35:00 -
[22]
Originally by: SnowUponPetal
If two campaigns involving the same alliance are taking place in the same area, you may as well call them one campaign. For example, the NC is effectively fighting both GBC and Triumvirate in the North. BoB has taken of an outpost in Vale of the Silent and Triumvirate have noted the proximity of BoB's MAX cap fleet to Tri holdings should the NC counter-attack there. Whether this alignment of GBC and Tri is coincidental or by design has no bearing on an objective list of forces and campaigns. Similarly, KIA and Daisho are hitting Pure, so they can be considered part of the conflict against the NC as well.
On that point, try to separate events from propaganda. You write that: "Triumvirate seems outnumbered, but with a superior will to fight, gaining them an advantage". Triumvirate likely sees things this way, but the NC's side of the story probably is different. Since the NC has a posting ban, you're not going to get both sides in CAOD. It would be more effective to write, "Triumvirate is engaged in an offensive against the Northern Coalition in Vale of the Silent. Triumvirate leaders ascribe their advantage to a superior will to fight. The NC has made no comment on the situation."
Unless he includes it as Triumvirate vs BoB vs NC I don't think they should be under the same campaign area. Tri are fighting both pretty regularly, but are only actively taking space from the NC. Same goes for BoB. His point about us fighting outnumbered is factually correct, so I don't see what is wrong with his point there 
Originally by: Easley Thames As for the AAA v. IAC campaign you could either put UNL as a AAA ally or you could list IAC v. UNL as a seperate campaign. In my opinion it makes more sense to list them as an ally of AAA but that is for them to clarify.
As for Goons it would make sense to add them as a AAA ally in the conflict against us since AAA and Goons are blue to each other and fighting the same enemy.
You could also list CVA + Paxton + Sylph v. AAA as a seperate campaign or you could group them together with IAC.
You could also potentially create a TCF v. AAA campaign since they are hostile and there has been at least one engagement (titan trap). Maybe it's too presumptious at this point though.
Unless I have misunderstood the thread, the thread is about large campaigns around eve, not just neighbour squabbles. Thus, Goons and AAA should not be under the same campaign name as goons are not actively taking part in removing you. About UNL, I'd say again that unless UNL are actively attacking pos of yours trying to remove you then it's un-needed. CVA+PXTN+Sylph vs AAA I agree need a campaign of their own, considering the regular fights they have over certain systems.
As said with unl/goons, AAA vs TCF isn't an actual fight for space yet, so I doubt that is needed under a campaign name yet.
|

Yogos
GBTeam C0VEN
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 06:47:00 -
[23]
Edited by: Yogos on 12/09/2008 06:52:20 Edited by: Yogos on 12/09/2008 06:51:28 Edited by: Yogos on 12/09/2008 06:49:05 Esoteria conflict is not rally a skirmishes type more like poswar.I think most alliances participating(except GoonsSwarm for sure) have gag on forum post so there is not many about it on caod or sch.
Fights in Esoteria are common from 3-4 months and periods of heavy fights mix with 2-3 weeks periods when both sides prepare more war material. 
Currently from almost 3 weeks contested is 111- station where previous was living MASS. Stainwagon forces kill jammer there and Atlas pos spam towers. MASS fight over week but they not have numbers to make serious thread for operation.
After it was sure that sov for station will go to Atlas they started killing GoonSwarm highend moons and took few (3 or 4). So Atlas have still profit here and i must say that this all words about Atlas as fail alliance is total bullshit. This guys are good pvpers and have balls big enough to put their caps in combat to hit large poses of on of biggest EVE power.
Anyway GS don't like that lost of profit moons and drop 5 large faction towers to 111-. They actually take back at least one high end moon. And so started war for station nobody really wants  
Day by day one side repair pos in time zone when they have advantage and stack other side pos stronted to their timezone .
GoonSwarm rule in US zone. Stainwagon use euro zone.
Few days ago Atlas wanted to finish 2 GS pos in late US zone and they were hot droped (Goons make topic about it).
That's all. Pos war in ugliness mean - to make opponent tired by constant incapacitating guns and atacking 1-2 pos pos day by day.
But i think both sides don't use all force and this campaign is counted on a long time. Biggest fights are still ahead of us.
EDIT: spelling 
|

Faekurias
Black Legion Command
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 10:46:00 -
[24]
Originally by: SnowUponPetal Edited by: SnowUponPetal on 12/09/2008 02:18:49 Thanks for giving a summary of the current conflicts a go. This is useful in the absence of updates to Joshua Fortrain's manual powerbloc map!
My 2 cents:
(What used to be) Hydra and the Triumvirate offensive against the NC is in the North, not the North-East. The North-East is the home of the Drone Region alliances, where there has recently been an offensive by Legion of xXDeathXx, SOLAR FLEET, Intrepid Crossing, and Ethereal Dawn against Imperial Republic of the North. That campaign ended last week with the removal of IRON from the area.
If two campaigns involving the same alliance are taking place in the same area, you may as well call them one campaign. For example, the NC is effectively fighting both GBC and Triumvirate in the North. BoB has taken of an outpost in Vale of the Silent and Triumvirate have noted the proximity of BoB's MAX cap fleet to Tri holdings should the NC counter-attack there. Whether this alignment of GBC and Tri is coincidental or by design has no bearing on an objective list of forces and campaigns. Similarly, KIA and Daisho are hitting Pure, so they can be considered part of the conflict against the NC as well.
On that point, try to separate events from propaganda. You write that: "Triumvirate seems outnumbered, but with a superior will to fight, gaining them an advantage". Triumvirate likely sees things this way, but the NC's side of the story probably is different. Since the NC has a posting ban, you're not going to get both sides in CAOD. It would be more effective to write, "Triumvirate is engaged in an offensive against the Northern Coalition in Vale of the Silent. Triumvirate leaders ascribe their advantage to a superior will to fight. The NC has made no comment on the situation."
Good luck in your campaign summaries!
Thank you! Good idea on the propaganda stuff, I should probably remove that, just felt naked without writing anything down there. Hah! I'm trying to keep it as simple as possible about the campaigns though, if I need more space I'll probably smack them together. But right now I think it might be easier to read when I splitted them. And I'm not sure about their standigns towards eachother so I don't want to assume too much .
Originally by: Easley Thames As for the AAA v. IAC campaign you could either put UNL as a AAA ally or you could list IAC v. UNL as a seperate campaign. In my opinion it makes more sense to list them as an ally of AAA but that is for them to clarify.
As for Goons it would make sense to add them as a AAA ally in the conflict against us since AAA and Goons are blue to each other and fighting the same enemy.
You could also list CVA + Paxton + Sylph v. AAA as a seperate campaign or you could group them together with IAC.
I will sure take a look at this, I'll probably put them in as purely backup for both sides though, I'm trying to stick to the "Main alliance" as much as possible to evade the "TL;DR" .
Thanks for the input, I will be sure to update with given information!
------------------ We are recruiting.
|

Faekurias
Black Legion Command
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 10:49:00 -
[25]
Thank you everyone, I'll try to update as good as I possibly can, whoever links will be delayed, it seems that Outpost alert is having a tremendous load currently haha
Again, thanks. And yes you did post graalum, but that was the other thread, I had to make a new one since I ran out of space. ------------------ We are recruiting.
|

Butter Dog
Gallente The Littlest Hobos
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 10:53:00 -
[26]
Edited by: Butter Dog on 12/09/2008 10:53:38 Why are some alliances a colour (even UNL has its own colour) when others are plain orange?
Disgraceful. ----------
AKA 'Bitter Dog'
Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05 |

Faekurias
Black Legion Command
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 10:59:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Rehmes Dot forget SOLAR and Legion have pretty much taken over what IRON had in the drone regions, IRC has also been involved IIRC.
Due to space limitations and to try and not making this a job, I decided to only do Currently Active major campaigns (Or not-so-major that are of great interest. FOr example, if Chribba should decide, by himself and say to BoB that "ALL YOUR VELDSPAR ARE BELONG TO ME!" I think I'd try and keep up to date with that as good as possible ).
Thank you for your input! ------------------ We are recruiting.
|

Faekurias
Black Legion Command
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 11:01:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 12/09/2008 10:53:38 Why are some alliances a colour (even UNL has its own colour) when others are plain orange?
Disgraceful.
All that are linked to Outpost alert becomes Orange, and the colour can't be changed. The colours are only really meant to be used for Coalitions, but since I am currently unable to link several major parts in wars I thought I might aswell give them colour. There aren't very many colours though :/ .
------------------ We are recruiting.
|
|

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 12:03:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Faekurias All that are linked to Outpost alert becomes Orange, and the colour can't be changed.
a colored link just next to a green one
Secure 3rd party service ■ Veldspar |
|

Faekurias
Black Legion Command
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 12:05:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Chribba
Originally by: Faekurias All that are linked to Outpost alert becomes Orange, and the colour can't be changed.
a colored link just next to a green one
What the, hax! Oooh I see what you did there. Thanks! ------------------ We are recruiting.
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |