| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Reaver Glitterstim
Resurrected Darkness
70
   |
Posted - 2012.03.27 23:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
Until recently, I was under the impression that omni-damage was a special type of damage that would always base its net damage on your lowest resistance. But someone told me that sleeper missiles do EM and thermal damage, and that sleeper turrets do explosive and kinetic damage.
Can anyone explain sleeper and incursion Sansha damage to me in as much gritty detail as possible? Numbers, percentages, and calculations preferred. Thanks in advance!
-á"The Mittani: Hated By Badposters
i'm strangely comfortable with it"
-Mittens |
Caleidascope
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
93
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 00:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
http://incursions.nexsoft.de/?mode=guide&sid=1
Life is short and dinner time is chancy
Eat desert first! |
mxzf
Shovel Bros
1108
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 00:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Omni-damage profile 25%, 25%, 25%, 25% (on average). There you go, mystery solved. |
drdxie
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
70
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 00:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
Its the other way around, laser will do EM and thermal and missiles will do explosive kinetic. Have no idea where to get details of damage amounts though... but if you had made the subject Incursions... Ammzi would have sorted you out quickly  |
Jack Miton
Lapse Of Sanity
Exhale.
156
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 01:59:00 -
[5] - Quote
Yeah, kin/therm on missiles, em/therm on guns.
It works out to 25% RAW damage in each damage type.
That said, you should focus on tanking em/therm more on small ships and kin/exp on large ships as a small sig radius reduces the damage taken from sleeper missiles a LOT. |
Reaver Glitterstim
Resurrected Darkness
74
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 03:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
I've always been told that small ships aren't viable in sleeper sites, but if what you guys say is true then I can probably find some that are. Thanks for the input.
I've got some testing to do!
-á"The Mittani: Hated By Badposters
i'm strangely comfortable with it"
-Mittens |
Jack Miton
Lapse Of Sanity
Exhale.
157
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 05:24:00 -
[7] - Quote
small = T3 |
Reaver Glitterstim
Resurrected Darkness
74
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 05:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:small = T3 We'll see. *gets assault ship*
-á"The Mittani: Hated By Badposters
i'm strangely comfortable with it"
-Mittens |
DarthNefarius
Ssssansha'S Deathhead Einsatzgruppen
108
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 19:41:00 -
[9] - Quote
While you really have to omni tank in incursions smaller ships need a lil more resists in the EM & thermal BS/BC's need resists a bit higher for Explosive/kinetic due to the banshie torps
"In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move." - D. Adams |
Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 21:04:00 -
[10] - Quote
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:Jack Miton wrote:small = T3 We'll see. *gets assault ship*
just don't pimp it too much; you'll probably lose it in your first C1 anom. |
|
|
Reaver Glitterstim
Resurrected Darkness
77
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 22:23:00 -
[11] - Quote
Daniel Plain wrote:just don't pimp it too much; you'll probably lose it in your first C1 anom. I can warp it out quickly if things get ugly.
-á"The Mittani: Hated By Badposters
i'm strangely comfortable with it"
-Mittens |
Jack Miton
Lapse Of Sanity
Exhale.
157
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 23:19:00 -
[12] - Quote
you can run C1s fin in AFs. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |