|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
1Of9
Body Count Inc.
Pandemic Legion
31
   |
Posted - 2012.03.29 07:53:00 -
[1] - Quote
Thank you ccp.
You did the right thing, altho the CSM rules state that he cannot run for CSM again.
Plz explain why you are allowing him to run again in the future. |
1Of9
Body Count Inc.
Pandemic Legion
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 08:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
1Of9 wrote:Thank you ccp.
You did the right thing, altho the CSM rules state that he cannot run for CSM again.
Plz explain why you are allowing him to run again in the future.
to pinpoint my claim:
http://community.eveonline.com/download/devblog/CSM.pdf
on page 20 it says, and i quote:
Quote:
CSM representative conduct
any behavior or actions considered being a material breach of the eula or tos
by a Csm representative is grounds for immediate dismissal and permanent
exclusion from all pending and future participation in the council. there are no
exceptions, regardless of the infraction. representatives are not only expected to
uphold the social contract that all society members are held accountable to, but
should also set a behavior standard for everyone else to follow.
In light of this, ccp please explain why he will be able to run for CSM in the future. |
1Of9
Body Count Inc.
Pandemic Legion
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 10:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
1Of9 wrote:1Of9 wrote:Thank you ccp.
You did the right thing, altho the CSM rules state that he cannot run for CSM again.
Plz explain why you are allowing him to run again in the future. to pinpoint my claim: http://community.eveonline.com/download/devblog/CSM.pdfon page 20 it says, and i quote: Quote:
CSM representative conduct
any behavior or actions considered being a material breach of the eula or tos
by a Csm representative is grounds for immediate dismissal and permanent
exclusion from all pending and future participation in the council. there are no
exceptions, regardless of the infraction. representatives are not only expected to
uphold the social contract that all society members are held accountable to, but
should also set a behavior standard for everyone else to follow.
In light of this, ccp please explain why he will be able to run for CSM in the future.
Bump |
1Of9
Body Count Inc.
Pandemic Legion
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 14:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
1Of9 wrote:1Of9 wrote:Thank you ccp.
You did the right thing, altho the CSM rules state that he cannot run for CSM again.
Plz explain why you are allowing him to run again in the future. to pinpoint my claim: http://community.eveonline.com/download/devblog/CSM.pdfon page 20 it says, and i quote: Quote:
CSM representative conduct
any behavior or actions considered being a material breach of the eula or tos
by a Csm representative is grounds for immediate dismissal and permanent
exclusion from all pending and future participation in the council. there are no
exceptions, regardless of the infraction. representatives are not only expected to
uphold the social contract that all society members are held accountable to, but
should also set a behavior standard for everyone else to follow.
In light of this, ccp please explain why he will be able to run for CSM in the future.
Bump |
1Of9
Body Count Inc.
Pandemic Legion
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 14:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:1Of9 wrote:1Of9 wrote:1Of9 wrote:Thank you ccp.
You did the right thing, altho the CSM rules state that he cannot run for CSM again.
Plz explain why you are allowing him to run again in the future. to pinpoint my claim: http://community.eveonline.com/download/devblog/CSM.pdfon page 20 it says, and i quote: Quote:
CSM representative conduct
any behavior or actions considered being a material breach of the eula or tos
by a Csm representative is grounds for immediate dismissal and permanent
exclusion from all pending and future participation in the council. there are no
exceptions, regardless of the infraction. representatives are not only expected to
uphold the social contract that all society members are held accountable to, but
should also set a behavior standard for everyone else to follow.
In light of this, ccp please explain why he will be able to run for CSM in the future. Bump He like any other player will be allowed to "apply" to run for CSM. But the CSM admin team will look at his history of warnings and past behaviour before saying yes or no. Knowing what we do of the circumstances of the ban I think we can probably imagine how that application will end up. (I'd expect its highly unlikely anyone from CCP will answer this question btw because it will stretch too closely to discussing disciplinary procedures about another player)
Ya i know that's the most probable route of action for ccp .. but .. the CSM rules state NO EXCEPTIONS.
He must NOT be allowed into the CSM again, as per rules.
Otherwise, ccp is opening a very very dangerous door.
a) goon special treatment theory's are proven right
b) mittanus claim on his recent ceo update where he claims and i quote: "One could additionally argue that IGÇÖve spent so much time in Iceland this year that IGÇÖve become co-opted by CCP; I have too many friends who work at the company and I donGÇÖt want to **** them over " (source)
c) CCP wont be able to permaban anyone from CSM in the future, since a new precedent is set.
Once again, i am waiting for some official answer on the matter, altho i understand it's not a easy subject to reply to, must be answered, otherwise CSM <-> CCP <-> GOONS relationship is not as transparent as CCP claim and needs further investigation, at the possible cost of CSM complete collapse, not to mention CCP/EVE itself. |
|
|
| |
|