Originally by: Anax Walsinghami

---

Originally by: O Thief

---

I know that a lack of lag generally means the NC losing since its the sole mechanism you've relied upon to 'win' fights for the past few years, but really... get over yourself.

---

Surely you jest. But then what battles have you been in lately other than FW.

---

Originally by: O Thief

---

Originally by: Anax Walsinghami

---

Originally by: O Thief

---

I know that a lack of lag generally means the NC losing since its the sole mechanism you've relied upon to 'win' fights for the past few years, but really... get over yourself.

---

Surely you jest. But then what battles have you been in lately other than FW.

---

Might I suggest you check your corp ticker before calling into question anyone elses PvP ability or experience

---

Originally by: Anax Walsinghami

---

Edited by: Anax Walsinghami on 29/09/2008 15:30:29

Originally by: O Thief

---

Originally by: Anax Walsinghami

---

Originally by: O Thief

---

I know that a lack of lag generally means the NC losing since its the sole mechanism you've relied upon to 'win' fights for the past few years, but really... get over yourself.

---

Surely you jest. But then what battles have you been in lately other than FW.

---

Might I suggest you check your corp ticker before calling into question anyone elses PvP ability or experience

---

Touche

---

Originally by: Andrommeda

---

Originally by: Anax Walsinghami

---

Edited by: Anax Walsinghami on 29/09/2008 15:30:29

Originally by: O Thief

---

Originally by: Anax Walsinghami

---

Originally by: O Thief

---

I know that a lack of lag generally means the NC losing since its the sole mechanism you've relied upon to 'win' fights for the past few years, but really... get over yourself.

---

Surely you jest. But then what battles have you been in lately other than FW.

---

Might I suggest you check your corp ticker before calling into question anyone elses PvP ability or experience

---

Touche

---

indeed

---

Originally by: Anax Walsinghami

---

To be clear I was not calling into question O Thiefs or his corps pvp experience. I was calling into question his knowledge that NC uses lag for our benefit. Last time I checked it was BoB that seems to understand and use lag to their benefit. As to Tgrads, we have not been involved in FW but we do our share of fielding pilots into NC fleets.

---

Originally by: Anax Walsinghami

---

Last time I checked it was BoB that seems to understand and use lag to their benefit.

---

Originally by: Richard Angevian

---

Nice that you tested a new node setup, but the obvious point needs to be brought up:

This is yet another example of BOB getting special treatment above and beyond what "normal" alliances (ie one that doesn't have half the dev team playing for). I've been in many huge battles, battles a lot larger than MSH, and not only has CCP done jack about it during the fight, they never have reimbursed ONE loss of mine that happened due to node issues.

If you are going to step in and boost a node for one particular battle, IMHO you are obligated to do so for EVERY battle. The live environment should never be used for testing, especially if it's done in a way as to give one in game entity (BOB) an advantage that you don't give everyone else.

---

Originally by: O Thief

---

Originally by: Richard Angevian

---

Nice that you tested a new node setup, but the obvious point needs to be brought up:

This is yet another example of BOB getting special treatment above and beyond what "normal" alliances (ie one that doesn't have half the dev team playing for). I've been in many huge battles, battles a lot larger than MSH, and not only has CCP done jack about it during the fight, they never have reimbursed ONE loss of mine that happened due to node issues.

If you are going to step in and boost a node for one particular battle, IMHO you are obligated to do so for EVERY battle. The live environment should never be used for testing, especially if it's done in a way as to give one in game entity (BOB) an advantage that you don't give everyone else.

---

If the node reinforcement wasn't requested by a member of the NC, you might have a point.

---

Originally by: Anax Walsinghami

---

Originally by: O Thief

---

Originally by: Richard Angevian

---

Nice that you tested a new node setup, but the obvious point needs to be brought up:

This is yet another example of BOB getting special treatment above and beyond what "normal" alliances (ie one that doesn't have half the dev team playing for). I've been in many huge battles, battles a lot larger than MSH, and not only has CCP done jack about it during the fight, they never have reimbursed ONE loss of mine that happened due to node issues.

If you are going to step in and boost a node for one particular battle, IMHO you are obligated to do so for EVERY battle. The live environment should never be used for testing, especially if it's done in a way as to give one in game entity (BOB) an advantage that you don't give everyone else.

---

If the node reinforcement wasn't requested by a member of the NC, you might have a point.

---

By this time the battle had shifted from MSHD to MO where NC was successfully preventing GBC from entering MO from Taisy. At this point the node crashed once again (# 6 or 7 I had lost count by then). Now it was at this point that CCP brought on the node repair. The funny part is that the repair now allowed BoB to enter MO in force while NC was not able to load back into game in enough time to do anything to prevent the incursion. This means that BoB was able to load AND enter MO while NC could not even load fast enough to do anything. I'll leave the more programing adept to answer why.
At this point after 6 node crashes prior, I don't know who requested what.

---

Originally by: Waagaa Ktlehr

---

You lost at least half your BS fleet with only killing one GBC BS before the node died and you're trying to tell us that you were winning that battle?

The ignorance of the Northern monkeys gets better by the day.

---

Originally by: Anax Walsinghami

---

Originally by: Waagaa Ktlehr

---

You lost at least half your BS fleet with only killing one GBC BS before the node died and you're trying to tell us that you were winning that battle?

The ignorance of the Northern monkeys gets better by the day.

---

Gee I stopped counting your losses on our KB at over 80. Perhaps Sir, you should post your own losses so you can get a better count.

---

Originally by: SK Rooster

---

Originally by: Anax Walsinghami

---

Originally by: Waagaa Ktlehr

---

You lost at least half your BS fleet with only killing one GBC BS before the node died and you're trying to tell us that you were winning that battle?

The ignorance of the Northern monkeys gets better by the day.

---

Gee I stopped counting your losses on our KB at over 80. Perhaps Sir, you should post your own losses so you can get a better count.

---

you should stop posting really, its embarrassing for your alliance

---

Originally by: Anax Walsinghami

---

Originally by: Waagaa Ktlehr

---

You lost at least half your BS fleet with only killing one GBC BS before the node died and you're trying to tell us that you were winning that battle?

The ignorance of the Northern monkeys gets better by the day.

---

Gee I stopped counting your losses on our KB at over 80. Perhaps Sir, you should post your own losses so you can get a better count.

---

Originally by: SK Rooster

---

Originally by: Anax Walsinghami

---

Originally by: Waagaa Ktlehr

---

You lost at least half your BS fleet with only killing one GBC BS before the node died and you're trying to tell us that you were winning that battle?

The ignorance of the Northern monkeys gets better by the day.

---

Gee I stopped counting your losses on our KB at over 80. Perhaps Sir, you should post your own losses so you can get a better count.

---

you should stop posting really, its embarrassing for your alliance

---

Originally by: Anax Walsinghami

---

Originally by: SK Rooster

---

Originally by: Anax Walsinghami

---

Originally by: Waagaa Ktlehr

---

You lost at least half your BS fleet with only killing one GBC BS before the node died and you're trying to tell us that you were winning that battle?

The ignorance of the Northern monkeys gets better by the day.

---

Gee I stopped counting your losses on our KB at over 80. Perhaps Sir, you should post your own losses so you can get a better count.

---

you should stop posting really, its embarrassing for your alliance

---

Whats embarrassing is someone without a clue trying to attention seek here. Oh wait, you are looking for a new corp to join and you hope to suck up to a BoB corp. Amirite?

---

Originally by: Richard Angevian

---

Nice that you tested a new node setup, but the obvious point needs to be brought up:

This is yet another example of BOB getting special treatment above and beyond what "normal" alliances (ie one that doesn't have half the dev team playing for). I've been in many huge battles, battles a lot larger than MSH, and not only has CCP done jack about it during the fight, they never have reimbursed ONE loss of mine that happened due to node issues.

If you are going to step in and boost a node for one particular battle, IMHO you are obligated to do so for EVERY battle. The live environment should never be used for testing, especially if it's done in a way as to give one in game entity (BOB) an advantage that you don't give everyone else.

---