|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |
Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
884
   |
Posted - 2012.03.29 15:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
Well done for nerfing 'SHITBIRD' corps from ever war deccing EVE UNI again
this was the whole reason for the War Dec changes right?
Being serious for a minute, valuing a war dec by the amount of people in the corp you are deccing isnt neccesarily in itself a problem, valuing each player at half a million is when you are a small corp deccing a big one.
You need to make it still viable for a small corp to wardec a larger one without bankrupting the small corp.
Also, your crimewatch ideas are very much in need of revision before you break hisec.
My homeboys tried to warn me
But that butt you got makes me so horny |
Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
884
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 15:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
Quoting from the 'Wardec round table' thread regarding new war dec costs
istyn wrote:Prince_Kobol wrote:
Just been reading the proposed war dec costs, is it me or does it basically mean the the large alliances will essentially be immune to any war dec because of the massive costs involved?
If this is the case the the smaller corps are just going to get hit even harder before.
For me if 1 person wanted to war dec a medium to large high sec alliance he should be able to, with the proposed costs this is just not going to be feasible any more.
Biggest alliance is Goonswarm at 8,057 members. Based on their being in no wars, war dec cost would be 50m+(8057*500k), which totals up to 4,078,500,000 per week. Such a huge amount could affect merc contract work such as disrupting null-sec logistics like Moar Tears, etc. do with shooting at freighters in high sec.
My homeboys tried to warn me
But that butt you got makes me so horny |
Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
889
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 10:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
CCP SoniClover wrote:
Q: Tiny entities deccing large entities?
A: The fact this makes this harder is a conscious decision. We don't want to ban this activity of course, but see no reason to support it.
how stupid do you sound?
incredibly
My homeboys tried to warn me
But that butt you got makes me so horny |
Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
889
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 10:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:Besbin wrote:Cosmetic suggestion:
Change the term "Killmail" to "Kill Report" to reflect the new setup.
It will no longer be just a mail and it will then be analogous to the "War Report". I like this idea <3 I wish I came up with it myself 
regardless they will be forever known as killmails, so dont you dare change it
My homeboys tried to warn me
But that butt you got makes me so horny |
Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
906
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 13:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
previous idea is crap
if i want to war dec an alliance into station i should be able to
the cost to wardec already skyrocketted
dont penalise the attacker if the defending corp decides not to undock for a week
when CCP says 'the defending corp takes control of the war' they mean you actually have to undock and shoot things and/or hire mercs/allies. The attacking corp is then locked into the war till the weekly timer is up.
My homeboys tried to warn me
But that butt you got makes me so horny |
|
|
| |
|