|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
lebrata
Hedion University
|
Posted - 2008.10.02 08:37:00 -
[1]
Edited by: lebrata on 02/10/2008 08:40:32
Originally by: D3MoRaLiZ3
1) What is the actual specific changes tht r gonna b made?
Every patch so far has made cruiser sized ship and smaller death traps and not worth flying, caused problems with BS, missile ships and totally screwed over small gang combat and a lot of other aspects of pvp in the game in general so i doubt it will be implemented any time soon.
Originally by: D3MoRaLiZ3 2) Will a nano curse still b viable after the nerf? (just got a new account skilling towards Ammar cruiser V, want to know if its actually worth it)
The patch as was killed speed tanking utterly and without exception, hacs became expensive wastes of space and anything smaller was also not worth flying. Battle cruisers especially caldari battle cruisers and battleships were the only things worth flying normally in RR setups.
The whole patch and the idea behind it sucked tbh but as with most ideas the ppl behind it are a little slow and a little unwilling to admit it and look for other more positive options like the addition of BS sized webs that have extra range in concert with the mwd killing scram idea that everybody thought was great.
|
lebrata
Hedion University
|
Posted - 2008.10.06 16:22:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Fenix Zealot
For my part, i think the real risk of death makes the engagement more fun if you win in the end.
My main has roughly 2000 kills on battleclinic and i am not that active at the moment cos i am moving house you have 50, what makes you think that you are qualified to know what your talking about considering you obviously do not pvp.
Originally by: Fenix Zealot Aside from that fact alone, real risk also introduces the need to plan out the situation and use certain tactics, rather than just activate guns, orbit at optimal, and wait for the enemy to die
The fact that you consider nano to be "hit orbit activate guns" as you commented here shows how little you know about it or pvp for that matter.
And its not about risk its about certainty cos cruisers and small ships like them melt in the first volley without speed to protect them.
THIS ISSUE IS AND ALWAYS WILL BE ABOUT RATTERS AND LAZY PLAYERS WANTING TO LOWER THE BAR SO THEIR RATTING SETUPS CAN BE EFFECTIVE AGAINST PURE PVP SPEC'D SHIPS.
LOCK TARGET F1-F8 IS NOT A SKILL.
|
lebrata
Hedion University
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 08:46:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Fullmetal Jackass
Ahhhhh, the bitter tears of joy for me. I haven't had this much fun on the forums in ages.
I see you learned forum posting from the goons while they were spanking you last year.
Originally by: Fullmetal Jackass Edit: BTW the changes aren't done yet so your whines and doomsaying are premature. I doubt you all will be happy, but I'm reasonably sure CCP can come up with a balanced fix.
I find it hard to put my faith in a group of ppl who created a mission that needed a mwd...in a dead space area.
|
|
|
|