| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Algey
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
   |
Posted - 2008.10.07 14:41:00 -
[1]
So where are you going to finish dying?
|
Algey
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2008.10.09 18:01:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Butter Dog
I need to train UK on avoiding CAOD trolls I see...
much work to be done, there is 
Shh, UK are dead...
|
Algey
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 07:39:00 -
[3]
Originally by: El'Shaitan
I used to hate IAC and CVA, and like the minmatar dudes. Now I hate ushrakan or whatever they call themselves. They are just a bunch of bobbit pets. Go CVA! to bad I dont fly amarr (yeah I still dislike iac or whatever is left of em)
You are a rather confused and silly person are you not. Just because CVA and IAC were fighting together, and IAC were an open part of the naptrain, that hardly makes UK part of the GBC.
|
Algey
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2008.10.13 07:07:00 -
[4]
Garreck, you bought in a vast fleet of non RP 0.0 alliance blobbage, and also spammed 25 (or so) towers as you were unable to kill the towers. That was the time I ceased to see CVA as a roleplay alliance.
Yes you wanted it more, and luckily UK didn't want it on those sort of terms. So now UK is a "failed" RP alliance that is still fighting slavers, and CVA is an excellent defensive 0.0 alliance.
This has all been said a thousand times, I don't know why I'm bothering.
|
Algey
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 01:22:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Garreck
Originally by: Butter Dog
UK maintained NRDS until they lost 9UY to you. How do I remember this? Because they forced my corp to practice NRDS in Providence as a condition of our docking rights.
Not sayin' they weren't NRDS. They just set people in CVA space red I guess. If it was terribly relevant years after the fact, I suppose I could dig up plenty of threads from Providence neutrals telling U'K to take their roleplay somewhere else or IGS threads where PIE and CVA condemned U'K's attacks in Providence and Amarr space against targets deemed to be slaver sympathizers...
These discussions really never get anywhere, though, because the feelings are too strong for whatever reason...and then folks such as yourself who have been around the conflict only from the time of the perceived wrong onward claim to have better knowledge than those who have been around the conflict from years beforehand.
Of course UK were going to go after your pets, and I'm not surprised that you defended them.
My point was that you're a 0.0 alliance that happens to do some roleplay on the side, and this still stands. UK were an inconvenience to your main goal, that of holding space in providence, which is why you mobilised such a fleet to remove them, spamming pos just before downtime rather than fighting "fairly". You can justify it however you like, and to be honest it doesn't even matter anymore (and we'll all believe our own viewpoint after all this time anyway).
Personally I do not consider CVA to be a roleplay alliance, however many do. My opinion also doesn't change anything, but hey you're all going to hear it 
|
Algey
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 07:55:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Octavinus Augustus
After 3 (?) years of fighting, CVA stood at the brink of "victory" (In lack of a better term). We suddently/finally/whatever had the capability of taking Unity and had to make a choice between the RP expectations and securing Providence.
I think the bitterness is more to do with the fact that CVA was not on that brink. CVA along with a huge blob of allies yes, CVA, no.
Imagine if UK had called in MC or something equally silly, and you'd have an idea of how people at the time felt about it.
Originally by: Octavinus Augustus
PS. I feel somewhat responsible for derailing this thread completely from it's original IAC content. Does that make me a real CAOD poaster?
I must admit that this is an epic derail, however IAC don't need the thread anymore
|
| |
|