EVE Search - [VOTE] REMOVE LOCAL

All Channels

Assembly Hall

[VOTE] REMOVE LOCAL

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Kransthow The Scope	Posted - 2008.10.12 00:36:00 - [1]
Kransthow The Scope	Posted - 2008.10.12 00:36:00 - [2]
Kransthow The Scope	Posted - 2008.10.12 00:37:00 - [3] supportin dis
Kransthow The Scope	Posted - 2008.10.12 00:37:00 - [4] supportin dis
Feriluce Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.	Posted - 2008.10.12 00:55:00 - [5] Edited by: Feriluce on 12/10/2008 00:55:42 Linkage Lol
Winchestori Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.10.12 01:28:00 - [6] no you newbie
Feriluce Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.	Posted - 2008.10.12 01:36:00 - [7] Originally by: Winchestori no you newbie I love your many arguments against the issue and the strong reason behind them. Very well written post.
Opertone SIEGE. United Legion	Posted - 2008.10.12 03:07:00 - [8] remove local, no free intel, the game is meant to be fun
Tevlent GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.10.12 03:13:00 - [9] Not unless a better on-board scanner is put into place.
Dianeces The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2008.10.12 03:15:00 - [10] Originally by: Opertone the game is meant to be fun I agree. Having to scan every belt in every single system you roam through to find ratters would make this game more fun.
Herschel Yamamoto Bloodmoney Incorporated	Posted - 2008.10.12 03:20:00 - [11] I can see some changes to the game involving the removal of local that would be beneficial overall - a decent one was proposed a couple months back(the Neural Network thread). A naked removal, however, would be a horrible idea. Don't eliminate it unless you replace it with a suite of other intel-gathering tools which are at least as powerful in the hands of a skilled player. ------------------ Herschel's Lottery #1 - Win a Kronos!
Feriluce Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.	Posted - 2008.10.12 03:55:00 - [12] Edited by: Feriluce on 12/10/2008 03:55:28 Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto I can see some changes to the game involving the removal of local that would be beneficial overall - a decent one was proposed a couple months back(the Neural Network thread). A naked removal, however, would be a horrible idea. Don't eliminate it unless you replace it with a suite of other intel-gathering tools which are at least as powerful in the hands of a skilled player. Replacing it with a better way to get intel than we have right now?(apart from local) Yes. Making it just as overly effective? No.
Seth Ruin Ominous Corp Ethereal Dawn	Posted - 2008.10.12 04:35:00 - [13] Originally by: Feriluce Edited by: Feriluce on 12/10/2008 03:55:28 Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto I can see some changes to the game involving the removal of local that would be beneficial overall - a decent one was proposed a couple months back(the Neural Network thread). A naked removal, however, would be a horrible idea. Don't eliminate it unless you replace it with a suite of other intel-gathering tools which are at least as powerful in the hands of a skilled player. Replacing it with a better way to get intel than we have right now?(apart from local) Yes. Making it just as overly effective? No. That's been the general consensus for the past several YEARS I've played EVE... Why the devs have completely ignored this aspect, I have no idea. (Hey, bonus! A great way to discourage blob warfare is to make it harder to know the opponents exact numbers by simply popping a scout in local)
GIJoeDirtbag Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.10.12 05:16:00 - [14] This is a god-awful idea. It doesn't surprise me that someone in a newb corp would suggest it. Locating people in a system take long enough as it is, and demands good skills either with a directional scanner or good skills with probing. Simply knowing that they're there is akin to a flight transponder or radar screen, it makes perfect sense, and allows people to know when to have fun and when to tred softly.
Varus Riaz Gallente Sarissa Defense Group	Posted - 2008.10.12 05:47:00 - [15] Edited by: Varus Riaz on 12/10/2008 05:47:30 Originally by: GIJoeDirtbag This is a god-awful idea. It doesn't surprise me that someone in a newb corp would suggest it. Locating people in a system take long enough as it is, and demands good skills either with a directional scanner or good skills with probing. Simply knowing that they're there is akin to a flight transponder or radar screen, it makes perfect sense, and allows people to know when to have fun and when to tred softly. This. Actually finding a target takes long enough. I'm not in support of this unless whatever replaces it actually tells you someone's in there. I could live with it not telling you exactly who was in there and just listing the number of people in system. Even with that it'd completely mess up empire wars. Good luck sifting through 100+ ships to try and find out if a wartarger is in local or not. Local would simply have to stay around in high-sec.
Qeng Nuwen Amarr GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.10.12 06:36:00 - [16] Edited by: Qeng Nuwen on 12/10/2008 06:37:10 If local is removed how will I let opposing gangs know that they are babies and that I had intimate relations with their mothers? edit: Where would I fofofo?
Vaal Erit Science and Trade Institute	Posted - 2008.10.12 08:38:00 - [17] Originally by: Winchestori no you newbie Replacement mechanic would be awesome, but removing local is a stupid idea. -- http://desusig.crumplecorn.com/sigs.html
Goumindong Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.10.12 09:09:00 - [18] Edited by: Goumindong on 12/10/2008 09:08:50 Originally by: Feriluce Originally by: Winchestori no you newbie I love your many arguments against the issue and the strong reason behind them. Very well written post. Indeed it does
Cory Trevor Brutor tribe	Posted - 2008.10.12 11:43:00 - [19] local shouldn't be removed until a new effective method of gathering system intel is put in place and actually implemented and working in-game. Not a second sooner. Not supported
Miss Possy	Posted - 2008.10.12 21:39:00 - [20] Not supported
Jin Labarre	Posted - 2008.10.12 22:09:00 - [21] "Remove" local. Add auto-join to constellation channel. Or in other words: Make local = constellation. Add a simple number to the top left that shows how many pilots are inside all the stuff listed there (System, Constellation, Region). That would give us even more general intel data, but less precise. Constellation is also better for local conversation for everyone but belthugging minerns and mission runners and you can still converse with friends and foe alike. Even better than now.
Melanie Griffin	Posted - 2008.10.13 08:58:00 - [22] Originally by: Jin Labarre "Remove" local. Add auto-join to constellation channel. Or in other words: Make local = constellation. Add a simple number to the top left that shows how many pilots are inside all the stuff listed there (System, Constellation, Region). That would give us even more general intel data, but less precise. Constellation is also better for local conversation for everyone but belthugging minerns and mission runners and you can still converse with friends and foe alike. Even better than now. This!
Aiden Bismuth Gallente Die Boeremag	Posted - 2008.10.13 11:05:00 - [23] Hasn't this been proposed before? My arguments against it are in another thread. AB

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.