| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lanasak
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
4
   |
Posted - 2012.04.02 17:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
Supported.
Members of the community willing to act as community advocates to CCP do not deserve to be harassed at work by their in-game enemies. This happened to Darius Johnson, Jade Constantine, and plenty others. It's time for that to end. |
Lanasak
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 08:19:00 -
[2] - Quote
evil kneevil wrote:Yeah, revealing R/L info about yourself may have consequences on the internet. If you eventually mess up, or **** off some anonymous people, you may end up being harassed.
All I can say to that is: deal with it ~10058~ (c) All rights reserved.
All I can say to you is: lol |
Lanasak
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 13:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
Zircon Dasher wrote:Just so I can be clear on the argument people have against this proposal:
Nobody knows that Liang Nuren = The Mittani
Liang Nuren runs for CSM
Because the RL names of the candidates are not revealed Liang is elected to the CSM
Mittens can go back to ruining EVE
Did I summerize it correctly?
Seems to me that unless CCP has some issues with RL names not being released to the playerbase (wierd laws or something) it should have been in place years ago.
Maybe I misunderstood the complaint though.
How was Mittens ruining EVE, specifically? Also, I suspect that if Goonswarm wants to get people on the CSM in any given term, they will. |
Lanasak
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 22:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
evil kneevil wrote:Zirise wrote:Signed.
The people that are against this are literally trying to say that RL identities hold someone more accountable because of the implication of RL reprisals. Holy **** you mentally unstable sociopaths need to get a life. If RL identities don't amount to any additional accountability, and are in fact meaningless to your conduct in the world of New Eden, why do you support changing the current situation and "anonymizing" CSM? What's there to gain? Obvious projection is obvious.
Considering that you personally said "WELL IF CSM MEMBERS SCREW UP THEY GET TO DEAL WITH THE CONSEQUENCES (harassment lol HTFU o7o7o7) IRL" I think we can safely assume that this proposal is completely reasonable, lobby our CSM delegates about it and hopefully see it in place for CSM 8.
Thanks for your support! |
| |
|