Interesting ideas. I'm still not a fan of blind chokepoints that you don't have any control over. The probe thingy is more interesting, but how do you allow "false" info to come back (ie. If the probe is destroyed, then there is obviously a gate camp and that person won't jump across)?

Before passing too much judgement on gates and how 'easy' it is to hunt folk. I recommend trying to catch anyone who is more than a 2 week resident in low-sec / null sec who doesn't want to be caught.

What you propose would make almost all opportunities for PvP consensual or pre-scheduled (POS timers etc ).

Seriously, take a shuttle/frigate/nano-cruiser through low sec, make some safes and keep your dscan up. Let me know how many times it takes for you to not warp directly to the smart bomb battleships at the gates and go loss free up until you get bored with living.

No thanks! Been there and came here cause I dislike milk & cookies as I dislike 1clickies :)

Well now we are at it
1) transfer drones from cargo bay to drone bay mid space and even other ships *poof* - there you go.
2) transfer equipment from one ship to another - *poof* there you go - fully gear for you drake in one click.
3) Hell - lets make it so we do not even have to fly anymore, I mean - teleportation right? Lets just be able to teleport everybody and everything around as we see fit. Why even have ships?

Oh and I want macros and addons cause then I REALLY do not have to think anymore. I can just spam 1,2 and 3 on keyboard activating my macros.

Being to able fully switch between 3 different fitting mid space in one click is imho a bad idea and do not serve a purpose. It will take away the team play and cooperation which is essential in this game as will removing role specific ships.

Give PVP a reason to exist as it has none at the moment.


remove the constant information about every system that allows you to see how many people are there from the other side of the galaxy

You pretty much cannot. With the move to virtualisation it is nigh on impossible to block this. Perhaps when the whole word is running IPv6 you may have a snowballs' hope in hell. But until then?

That aside - why? I have an Industrial pilot that I sometimes escort with my combat pilot. Meantime I have a trade alt on a different account that sits in Jita and runs my business empire. That is 3 accounts (Well, was 3 accounts until recent events) that provide CCP with revenue.

I liked giving them money

What proposals do you have as an alternate method of hunting targets? Currently it is literally impossible to catch an aware and experienced pilot, non-consensual PvP in this game is literally down to just picking off the idiots. Removing gate camping as a viable tactic would even further reduce the PvP element of Eve.

1. Remove local
2. Remove Concord
3. Don't care

1) Make it profitable to go into lowsec. As of now, there is no reason to go to lowsec aside from higher PI output and if you actually WANT to tank your sec status. I know CCP "claims" to have buffed the lowsec anomalies earlier this year/late last year...but I went to lowsec immediately after that to start scanning plexes....spent 2 days doing it and they were all horrible...

2) Be able to have either a- multiple Jump Bridges in the same system, or b- multiple destinations for a single jump bridge, making it possible to have larger logistic hubs in nullsec. Some people will call foul that this takes part of the risk out of doing nullsec logistics...when in reality...it doesnt... It would just make the JB's work much in the same way the cyno generators do...It wouldnt make the logi-routes any safer.. If anything, it would make certain systems even more valuable to an alliance and would cause greater harm to take down a JB-hub than just a normal one since you would be losing potentially several JB routes at once. This could also be accomplished by having a single-destination JB and then having a tech1 version that allowed for maybe up to 3 destinations...

3) Ship size/mass should = ship bumping ability

To be fair if you genuinely spent two days doing exploration and found nothing of value, you were probably doing it wrong. The risk free element of plexing in low sec, and the easy logistics, means that running them for a solo player is even more profitable than null sec and in some cases incursions.

Of course, if you genuinely meant you were doing anomalies, and not exploration, you really were doing it wrong :P Anoms are of terrible value wherever you go, the only reason people even run them still in null is because in SoV null they're easy, grind-able and relatively risk free for an attentive player. (They're still pointless in NPC null mind you)


Logistics in null is easy enough already. Allowing for multiple destinations would make it hard to scout if you are camping a JB, and they're already pretty difficult to camp. It would also let people create alternate routes if a JB is camped, further avoiding any danger.

If anything logistics in null needs to be made more difficult, as it stands any expensive ships or loot are moved via JF or carrier. And deploying to a new area for PvP can be done risk free in a matter of hours with enough carriers and a good cyno chain.

Also, what risk in null sec logistics? Camping and roams nowadays literally just pick off the idiots, the vast majority of competent players have never and will never lose anything of value under the current mechanics.


That's a start, but station games and aggression timers need a total rework IMHO.

I was scanning them, not running Anoms. I went out there b/c I was told that lowsec got a buff and people were making stupid isk... I'm notoriously the most unlucky person you'll ever meet when it comes to getting the signatures I'm looking for. If I want a grav site, i'll find everything else but a grav site. If im looking for a mag site, i'll find everything execpt for a mag site. Murphy's Law follows me everywhere I go.

The Hub idea is not made for Freighters, as a JF would use the cyno gen and not the JB. The JB Hub is more for moving fleets around. Why would it be bad to make it more difficult for an enemy to camping your JB? If anything it makes a single JB more profitable b/c you will get more activity. And IMO, I would like the idea of an enemy hitting a certain system b/c that is where a hug was and they knew it. It gives more of a reason to defend it....Unless you are IRC lol....

The trick to running sites in low sec is to only run angel and guristas rated sites ;) There's only one escalation site worth doing, I think it's called "angel pleasure gardens" or something. The thing never fails to escalate for some reason


Freighters use the JB network, jump freighters use cyno gens or their own personal cyno alts. But what does that have to do with my comment on how easy logistics is in null? They've already nerfed the JB network in the past, and with good reason, CCP aren't going to move them back in that direction.

And of course it would be bad to make it more difficult to camp a JB, because null sec is already ridiculously easy to operate in.

1. Remove the ability of NPC corp alts to post.