Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Serenity Steele
Dynamic Data Distribution Ministry of Information
|
Posted - 2008.11.02 16:30:00 -
[31]
Edited by: Serenity Steele on 02/11/2008 16:33:39
Endorsement from 1st CSM Vice-Chairman
In terms of CSM participation, I think Eva's (Ankhesentapemkah/Ank) consistent effort to improve the communication to players and co-operation within the CSM stood out amongst 1st CSM members. Ank did a great job as secretary, and in preparing and raising issues to the council.
While I personally totally disagree with Ank's platform for a carebear future of duel-universe EVE, I find Ank's increasingly mature attitude and consistently analytical input to non carebear related issues delivers value for EVE players beyond her particular views on EVE.
Serenity Steele Vice-Chairman 1st CSM
≡v≡ Strategic Maps in Eve-Online Store | eve-maps.com |
Alec Weinstein
|
Posted - 2008.11.02 17:51:00 -
[32]
Ankhesentapemkah is a CSM candidate that represents the ideals of my corporation: cooperation, progress, and efficiency. I'll vote for her, and hope you'll do the same.
|
Ankhesentapemkah
Gallente Aliastra
|
Posted - 2008.11.03 09:16:00 -
[33]
Edited by: Ankhesentapemkah on 03/11/2008 09:17:06
Originally by: Captator Expand on how you would facilitate player<-->CSM<-->CCP discussion and transparency please.
One of the problems with the current situation is that it takes a long time before the players know what has happened with their issues. Often they do not know which issues have been advocated, or even dealt with by CCP already. Threads get buried and reposted, and as we've all seen, the forum quickly becomes a horrible mess where it is hard to find information. To that end I am currently working on a wiki, which will be made public this week, so players can see what the CSM is currently working on and what the status of their important issues are.
Another problem is that most Eve players do not frequent the forums or willing to post here at all. For these people I want more CSM-wide public discussions, as right now all these initiatives were organized by individual CSM members (I have ingame focus groups to remain in touch with the players, but I have no idea what the other CSM members did to this end).
Last, right now I have the feeling that our issues end up in a black box, and we often do not have insight in what happens with it. Currently a CSM member is responsible for each individual issue, and I would like CCP to mirror this and assign someone to be responsible for each issue as well. If promises were made and we do not hear of it for a while, I'd like this CSM member to get in touch with the CCP employee that was assigned this issue, and ask for a status update. This prevents the resubmission of important issues as well just to get more information (30d GTC, Skill Queue, Small Freighter etc). ---
NEW MOVIE! CSM Campaign Thread |
Sir SmellyFart
State War Academy
|
Posted - 2008.11.03 11:37:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah Edited by: Ankhesentapemkah on 03/11/2008 09:17:06
Originally by: Captator Expand on how you would facilitate player<-->CSM<-->CCP discussion and transparency please.
One of the problems with the current situation is that it takes a long time before the players know what has happened with their issues. Often they do not know which issues have been advocated, or even dealt with by CCP already. Threads get buried and reposted, and as we've all seen, the forum quickly becomes a horrible mess where it is hard to find information. To that end I am currently working on a wiki, which will be made public this week, so players can see what the CSM is currently working on and what the status of their important issues are.
Yup, a major annoyance for a lot of players. I support any effort to clear up communication on those matters
|
Arithron
Gallente Gallente Trade Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.11.03 18:41:00 -
[35]
A list of issues submitted, voted upon, (escalated and voted down) including links to relevant issue threads should have happened from the start if the CSM term. It was clear that CCP was leaving the administration up to the CSM from the start. I do not buy excuses on this issue at all. It wasn't done. Hold up hands and admit it should have been, stop blaming others for the failing to do so (or the 'tools').
As the CSM secretary, it would ultimately fall upon your shoulders to have such a recording system in place. Ultimately, such a recording system needs to be linked at the start of the Assembly Hall forum (as this is where issues need to be posted, makes sense that indexes to past issues etc are here also for reference before posting).
Its really too little too late for this CSM session.
Quote: I think there is a lot of room for improvement, and the second CSM incarnation should work together in making this undertaking a success.
I agree there is a lot of room for improvement. I realise that the fragmentation (of sorts) of the CSM early on didn't help or inspire members to go the extra mile on indexes etc. I also acknowledge that submission of issues to you by CSM members was probably a frustrating and thankless task. However, this is a matter of priorities; CSM --> player communication should have a very high priority.
Take care, Arithron
Vote Arithron for CSM!
Check out my thread: http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=899358 |
Tiger313
313th Squadron
|
Posted - 2008.11.04 01:35:00 -
[36]
You've done a good Jobse the first round, Eva: you've got my vote again this year.
Goed werk, dame: ga zo door!
|
Mynxee
Hellcats Doom Armada
|
Posted - 2008.11.05 19:39:00 -
[37]
Eva has my vote.
Life in Low Sec | Hellcats
|
Vio Geraci
Amarr GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.11.07 19:07:00 -
[38]
My concern with is that you completely dropped the ball on the capital ship issue when it came before the CSM, largely because you are a dilettante with regards to pvp, especially unrestricted pvp.
In your candidacy post here, you try to take credit for things that CSM voters should have good reason to believe that CCP was doing anyway, like boosting black ops and nerfing suicide gankers.
|
Sirial Soulfly
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 10:50:00 -
[39]
Voted for Eva ! as she is smart and brings fresh ideas to eve.
|
Leandro Salazar
Celestial Apocalypse
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 14:23:00 -
[40]
You just got my vote and I would advise anyone who has voted for me in the last election to do the same :) And if you are reading this, you have arrived at the signature without noticing...
|
|
Dariah Stardweller
|
Posted - 2008.11.09 15:48:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Leandro Salazar You just got my vote and I would advise anyone who has voted for me in the last election to do the same :)
She seems to get quite some recomendations :)
Well Ank, you just recieved my 2 votes too :)
|
iudex
Caldari State Protectorate
|
Posted - 2008.11.10 17:02:00 -
[42]
You get my vote because i like faction warfare. Please continue to ask for a content injection for faction warfare. _________________________________________ Faction Standings: Serpentis +7.81 // Angel Cartel +7.60 // Minmatar Republic -8.68 // Gallente Federation -9.88
|
Louis deGuerre
Gallente Universe At War
|
Posted - 2008.11.11 00:31:00 -
[43]
Got my vote once more. Expect you to chase CCP with a big stick to finally add the dratted skill queue and improve FW -------------------------------------------------- If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles - Sun Tzu |
Rhatar Khurin
Minmatar Free Ammatar Aid Organisation
|
Posted - 2008.11.12 01:51:00 -
[44]
You always have my vote. You seem to care about exactly the same things i do. Without pushing 0.0 major alliance wars.
Huzzah!
|
Jacque Custeau
Knights of the Minmatar Republic
|
Posted - 2008.11.12 13:22:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Vio Geraci My concern with is that you completely dropped the ball on the capital ship issue when it came before the CSM, largely because you are a dilettante with regards to pvp, especially unrestricted pvp.
In your candidacy post here, you try to take credit for things that CSM voters should have good reason to believe that CCP was doing anyway, like boosting black ops and nerfing suicide gankers.
I agree entirely with this. The endorsement of anyone from the first CSM is worthless. These are people that formed friendships and want to make sure they can see their new friends again. The heaps of praise hurled on her mainly outline organizational tasks that one would expect from an assistant, secretary, or that weird lady in the courtroom who writes down everything everyone says.
As a player Ankh does not really fit anywhere. She is not a serious PvP'er nor a serious industrialist. She doesn't have to deal with fleet fights, and doesn't have her own POS to run or fuel. There are other candidates from the first CSM I would vote for, but Ankh is not one of them. -------------------
|
Virtuozzo
Aliastra
|
Posted - 2008.11.12 14:12:00 -
[46]
Edited by: Virtuozzo on 12/11/2008 14:12:25 Still, she makes the effort to dig into things, as opposed to just sitting back in a chair and commenting. She's explored other corporations, ran through ops, sat down with people evening after evening, it is a generalistic perspective yes, but she makes sure she goes where she has to.
It's a choice between someone who knows everything about a little bit, or a little bit about everything, combined with the will to listen and learn and experience :-)
There are CSM candidates out there who are further in terms of exposure and to a degree experience, but the ability to step into the shoes of others counts for a lot. As does a sound communicative and administrative skillset.
Everybody has a learning curve in EVE, heck, many learning curves over time :-) What matters is the ability to grow, listen, communicate and combine. From where I stand she is one of the top three candidates exactly for these abilities, she'll make an even better CSM member in a next term.
She does not fit in one box indeed, instead she's capable of seeing more then one box. Most people never get out of their box in their entire life :P
CAOD FTW.
|
Leandro Salazar
Celestial Apocalypse
|
Posted - 2008.11.13 20:07:00 -
[47]
Originally by: Jacque Custeau As a player Ankh does not really fit anywhere. She is not a serious PvP'er nor a serious industrialist. She doesn't have to deal with fleet fights, and doesn't have her own POS to run or fuel.
I think exactly this qualifies her for being a good CSM member. I bet the vast majority of EVE players do not fit anywhere, but instead do everything a little bit. Maybe not all at the same time, but definitely throughout the course of their careers. The hardcore one aspect guys are usually very vocal, but just as much a minority as they are biased. And if you are reading this, you have arrived at the signature without noticing...
|
Maria Kalista
|
Posted - 2008.11.16 06:49:00 -
[48]
Just voted, moge de beste winnen.
Originally by: CCP Mitnal You put a bear in your tea???
Clear Skies - an EVE vid with a difference.
|
Gealbhan
Caldari Infernal Syndicate
|
Posted - 2008.11.18 09:57:00 -
[49]
You got my vote, I want to see the skill queue getting pushed forward.
|
Ankhesentapemkah
Gallente Aliastra
|
Posted - 2008.11.22 00:31:00 -
[50]
Thanks to all that supported me! ---
NEW MOVIE! CSM Campaign Thread |
|
Karando
Random Goods
|
Posted - 2008.11.22 12:18:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah You do know I'm one of the top factional warfare players, right?
That's a joke, right?
|
Herschel Yamamoto
Bloodmoney Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.11.22 13:00:00 -
[52]
Originally by: Karando
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah You do know I'm one of the top factional warfare players, right?
That's a joke, right?
No, just an interesting definition of "top" - she's got top rank in two militias, but she does it without fighting. Unoccupied complexes get you rank quickly, it seems.
|
Ankhesentapemkah
Gallente Aliastra
|
Posted - 2008.11.22 15:52:00 -
[53]
Edited by: Ankhesentapemkah on 22/11/2008 15:52:55
Originally by: Karando
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah You do know I'm one of the top factional warfare players, right?
That's a joke, right?
I got exactly 68000 victory points.
According to FW-stats, that puts me on 5th place. Kills are meaningless.
Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto
Originally by: Karando
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah You do know I'm one of the top factional warfare players, right?
That's a joke, right?
No, just an interesting definition of "top" - she's got top rank in two militias, but she does it without fighting. Unoccupied complexes get you rank quickly, it seems.
Still took me 3 months to get the Gallente one after they nerfed the standing gains, so quickly it was not. ---
NEW MOVIE! CSM Campaign Thread |
Karando
Random Goods
|
Posted - 2008.11.22 19:52:00 -
[54]
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah I got exactly 68000 victory points.
According to FW-stats, that puts me on 5th place. Kills are meaningless.
in a pvp game. alright.
|
Ankhesentapemkah
Gallente Aliastra
|
Posted - 2008.11.23 23:24:00 -
[55]
Originally by: Karando in a pvp game. alright.
1) Eve is a sandbox game. 2) The game mechanics of factional warfare do not offer any rewards for kills, thus there is no point. 3) I plan to fix point 2. ---
NEW MOVIE! CSM Campaign Thread |
Maximum KILLDEATHRATIO
Minmatar 24th Imperial Crusade
|
Posted - 2008.11.24 00:14:00 -
[56]
FW is a very very tiny part of it, forget kills in FW, think bigger. Statistics, achievements, etc for everyone for everything.
|
Serenity Steele
Dynamic Data Distribution Ministry of Information
|
Posted - 2008.11.24 21:51:00 -
[57]
Congratulation on 2nd CSM Ank :)
≡v≡ Strategic Maps in Eve-Online Store | eve-maps.com |
Kayscha
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 09:19:00 -
[58]
Glad to see you elected, and you did even better than last time! Hope you will be able to help push this game towards more of your stated goals.
|
Threv Echandari
Caldari K Directorate
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 15:46:00 -
[59]
Congratulations Ank, my Alt - voted for you cause your a real girl.. I kid, I kid, Good job last season, good luck next season! ---------------------------------------- Happiness is a Wet Pod
|
Extreme
Eye of God Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 16:27:00 -
[60]
Feli Eva! . .
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |