Originally by: Croesus

---

Edited by: Croesus on 30/06/2004 02:28:44
Edited by: Croesus on 30/06/2004 02:20:19
Why is the damage output less when fightin at close range, and another thing most people dont carry any eccm¦s (pls correct me if im wrong here since this is just my perception). You never know whether your gonna be damped, not many awnsers to that except maybe an mwd, or multy¦d(most ew scorp players i know are massivly paranoid and carry eccm¦s and go way over the top when scrambling), and the raven has an awnser of sort to ew, not very good one though in the form of fof, and lastly whats not very killable when 2-3 battleships pound on it :).

and about shield tankin being old school.

Does it really matter how you tank, in the instances you defete your enemy its usually a gank where you and your m8s trash some solo bs, and when u lose its usually the other way around. Doesnt matter how well you tank you¦ll go down.

In smaller schirmishes it might matter to have the most cap efficient tankin, but is that more important than just to have as much dmg as possible and try to take one of them out as fast as possible or ew, i dont think so, could be wrong though hehe.

In fleet dmg is king, it doesent matter how well you tank your going to go down fast when u get lit up, cap efficiency takes second place to dmg, ew and really really fast Armour/shield boostin (i have never armor tanked so i dont know anything about how fast it is) as youll hope that your ship will hold together for long enough to warp out.

The only time it really matters what sort of tankin your using and what is more cap efficiant is one on one, which really never happens.

So is tanking imoprtant, yes but not as much as ppl would like to belive.

I really dont know why i wrote this crap.

---