| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.07.03 23:22:00 -
[1]
Edited by: JoCool on 03/07/2004 23:27:11 First: Very nice changes, I welcome them. Finally missiles will be useful at long range, without eating frigates and cruisers for breakfast.
But TomB, what about this:
Fictional: Megathron with 400m3 Signature Radius, using the MWD -> x500% = 2000m3 SR. Velocy: 800m/s
Sig Radius: 2000 / 400 = 5 Velocy: 400 / 800 = 0.5 Damage: 400*5*0.5 = 1000 total damage
Will you limit this to the maximal damage the missile is able to do, to prevent that? Like: If damage exceeds 300, cut it down to 300 ?
Another question: Will my Missiles do less damage when I shoot at Minmatar battleships and the like or will you even out the signature radii for the battleships?
|

JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.07.03 23:22:00 -
[2]
Edited by: JoCool on 03/07/2004 23:27:11 First: Very nice changes, I welcome them. Finally missiles will be useful at long range, without eating frigates and cruisers for breakfast.
But TomB, what about this:
Fictional: Megathron with 400m3 Signature Radius, using the MWD -> x500% = 2000m3 SR. Velocy: 800m/s
Sig Radius: 2000 / 400 = 5 Velocy: 400 / 800 = 0.5 Damage: 400*5*0.5 = 1000 total damage
Will you limit this to the maximal damage the missile is able to do, to prevent that? Like: If damage exceeds 300, cut it down to 300 ?
Another question: Will my Missiles do less damage when I shoot at Minmatar battleships and the like or will you even out the signature radii for the battleships?
|

JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.07.05 07:36:00 -
[3]
TomB, again I'd like to ask:
Will the Tempest and Typhoon suffer generally less damage being hit by Missiles because of their lesser signature radii? Can you confirm this?
|

JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.07.05 07:36:00 -
[4]
TomB, again I'd like to ask:
Will the Tempest and Typhoon suffer generally less damage being hit by Missiles because of their lesser signature radii? Can you confirm this?
|

JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.07.11 23:59:00 -
[5]
Quote: Picture this (out of line, but perspective): "I want a module that I can fit in my Ravens last two high slots that will deactivate one or two of your guns, and you have no option of countering that using eccm or anything else, which also can shoot down frigs." - That is how the rocket launchers with defenders are today.
Damn true!
|

JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.07.11 23:59:00 -
[6]
Quote: Picture this (out of line, but perspective): "I want a module that I can fit in my Ravens last two high slots that will deactivate one or two of your guns, and you have no option of countering that using eccm or anything else, which also can shoot down frigs." - That is how the rocket launchers with defenders are today.
Damn true!
|

JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.07.15 00:06:00 -
[7]
I do think he reads all this and gathers feedback, that's his job.
TomB must be one of the biggest trollz in history.
|

JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.07.15 00:06:00 -
[8]
I do think he reads all this and gathers feedback, that's his job.
TomB must be one of the biggest trollz in history.
|

JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 15:57:00 -
[9]
"A tool is only useless when you don't know how to use it." - ActiveX
|

JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 15:57:00 -
[10]
"A tool is only useless when you don't know how to use it." - ActiveX
|

JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.08.15 11:49:00 -
[11]
*nods*
but you forgot: best looking ships (Gallente) best looking avatars (Gallente)
|

JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.08.15 11:49:00 -
[12]
*nods*
but you forgot: best looking ships (Gallente) best looking avatars (Gallente)
|
| |
|