Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

ChYph3r
Multiplex Gaming SpaceMonkey's Alliance
46
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 14:57:00 -
[31] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Whenever someone refines ores, tax them ISK, not minerals. Figure out the tax by the value of the minerals refined.
Determine the market price(Jita or average of all +0.5 sec trades) of all minerals. Weighted by volume and an average across the past week. Any price more than +/-20 percent of last average is discarded. No more than 20% of total volume discarded. If more than 20% discarded, then average for all sales.
This is a very simple SQL query.
I understand charging minerals is "elegant" in that you don't have to determine market prices, but you are like ten years in.
Do the minimal work required to create this ISK sink.
I'm telling you right now if the programmers start whining at you..... something is very wrong with your programming department. This is very easy to do. I could do it. In like a day. Anyone who has used SQL of any kind should be able to.
If you don't have an SQL database for transactions. Well then. That is very interesting in itself.
Umm they cant do that because of the null sec stations have an option to charge members, or allies already.....and why are you all so freaking willing to give your isk to ccp all the time?
FREE THE MITTANI ---- 10058 AMP - Angry Monkey Podcast |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
712
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 15:06:00 -
[32] - Quote
Better idea for an isk sink: Charge people for creating new topics on the forums.
Charge extra for poorly thought-out ideas.
Charge double for posts in the wrong sub-forum.
It would be a simple matter of an SQL query to do, it MUST be a good idea.
Here's your sign... |

Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
467
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 15:38:00 -
[33] - Quote
idea is good in principle. but im gonna say no. |

Aqriue
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
520
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 15:56:00 -
[34] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Whenever someone refines ores, tax them ISK, not minerals. You got it wrong.
Cut the refine amount of modules in half, this should be the tax. Less minerals. Reasoning is, modules should be the item of desire not the minerals inside. We don't buy TVs to take home, split them up, then try to sell off the parts..
Leave ores and ice as is. This will then be the defacto source of minerals for EVE. As one source of minerals is reduced (mission loot generally), minerals will now have a high demand for the miners. Less competition, means more demand for the miners which should cause the market to flux up and down on the supply/demand depending how much they can keep up.
Because there will be a more finite (fluxuating amount) produced and the greatest supply would be from miners, more buyers will need to by straight from the miners and this means more market transactions. This is where you isk sink in the form of taxes.
tl;dr version
1. Nerf module refining, dries up market from mission loot produced and makes refining less profitable...more modules will stay as modules or you lose minerals if you reprocess it (why the **** do you build an item to reprocess it? ). Also makes missioning even less profitable and we all don't want that 
2. Less competition for the miners, more demand for them. Their prices rise and fall depending on how much they keep up with demand, as the point should be Mine -> Sell -> Build -> Blow up not Mine -> Sell -> Build -> Sell, fails -> Refine -> Build second item: Minerals never leave EVE!
3. You want to transport minerals, compress it. Good use for the Noctis and ORE industrial skill, repurpose it to compress minerals since after Inferno the loot ship will be even useless (Rorq still has multi-utility as side fro compression). Trust me, all those ECM / ECCM / 800 Cap Booster you get excluding the meta 0 loot which will be gone...crap! Hope CCP does something about adding more meta 1-4 loot drops. |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3691
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 15:58:00 -
[35] - Quote
Sigh...
For any and all of you who think mining is a isk faucet needs to go sit down in one of eve unis economic class. or soemthing.
Mining is an isk sink. Period. Failure to understand this concept is failure to grasp the eve economy.
What mining does is a open an Object Faucet however. Which plays into the cirlce of object life very well, Harvest Build Destroy is quite at a near healthy state. Other than profiliation of super capitals most things are getting destroyed pertty consistenly.
I supposed a higher refinery tax (which would almost require 9.0 standigns to nullify) would do worlds of good of encouraging outward growth of eve from high into low as well as lower efficency (overstressed refineries people being croocked) Low secs threshhold should be much lower 5.0 standings or less. Null should be allow to get to perfect relatively easily for allaince level efforts depending on the outposts and upgrades to the outposts.
An isk tax on refining wouldnt be as sensible as mineral loss via mineral tax.
The issue is you do not want to put eve into a position where if you where knocked down back your velator you should be able to recover from it. Empire sales taxes are about to go up, as well as transaction taxes from the SEC. There are alot of monkey wrenches being thorwn back in and at the rate of the economy turmoil we're quickly heading back to a era where deploying a battleship was soemthing you didnt do on a whim because they where replacable.
Carrier losses are going to hurt again. With the frigate boost inbound expect more and more pvpers to migrate twoards bang for the buck options.
So TL;DR version
Isk tax on refines bad idea Higher Mineral Tax on scapping a good idea. Higher Mineral Tax on refining in empire and slightly lower than empire in low also a good idea.
|

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 15:59:00 -
[36] - Quote
Question : What should inflation be in EVE per month? 0.5% / 1% / 1.5% / 2% ???
Wouldn't Inflation be the BEST tool to combat the isk influx?
game has been going for 10 years, that is 120 months.
With 1% inflation per month, that means mex should be at 52 isk With 1.5% inflation per month, mex should be 95 isk
1 plex used to give you 1 fitted BS now you get 4.
Let prices stabilize at something that would be about 4x base value, and ALL off the economical issues will go away, and solve the T2 BPO issues as well.
Trit 4 pyer 16 mex 64 iso 256 Nock 1024 Zyd 4096 Mega 16384
I know that mega will not go that high, trit will go higher, pyer lower. This is the BEST buff empire miners / producers could get.
T1/T2 item production times up 500% , sub-cap ships production times up by 300%
Create XL rigs for caps
Make more useful rigs.
All in all, this would remove the need for limiting isk influx, it would be just fine. However, there would be a need for a buff in the anti BOT world, and a de-buff of concorde on 4-6 seconds across the board. |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
46
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 18:41:00 -
[37] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:I'm curious why "people holding on to their ISK" is a problem. Cause you say it is? Cause you can become really excited when talking about it? Is that why?
If 10,000 players had 100,000,000,000 ISK each in their wallet and never ever spent it, that would be a problem how?
BECAUSE MITTANI SAID! And we have gotten all super excited about it!
So, how do you think, zippy, those people are going to react to Null Bears shaking them down for all their ISK?
I know, I know, they need to HTFU. Or leave. One or the other. Because if people just accumulate ISK over time, without any meaningful expenditure, then when the time comes that the market is saturated and everything is available to everybody then fixing the issue is even more difficult and painful. Not to mention the fact that the "player driven economy" ceases to favor the players driving the economy, aka miners and industrialists. The fact that you think Eve should be some space rich wonderland in which everyone owns everything doesn't matter, that is not popular opinion. Just read the threads on the subject of economic upheaval: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1079092#post1079092Notice that the OP's post complaining about economic turmoil receives two likes, and is flamed for the next 10 pages. The second and third posts expressing optimism for the incoming changes received a total of more than 70 likes, and the opinions are mirrored in the posts that span the next ten pages. Also, FYI I strongly suspect more than 10,000 players do have over 100b in their wallets. The truth is that in Eve today most players can afford almost any ship, and losing those ships has little meaning to them. You may think that is good, we disagree. Guess you should just HTFU and be more careful with your ships, because this change is happening. Try to enjoy it.
In the harsh uncompromising world of Eve, you fight for your ISK, and earn it, until Dev God decides to take it all away cause Null Bears told him to.
Eve only has 300,000 accounts because every other company is to stupid to make a MMO with spaceships.
|

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
46
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 18:43:00 -
[38] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:Sigh...
For any and all of you who think mining is a isk faucet needs to go sit down in one of eve unis economic class. or soemthing.
Mining is an isk sink. Period. Failure to understand this concept is failure to grasp the eve economy.
What mining does is a open an Object Faucet however. Which plays into the cirlce of object life very well, Harvest Build Destroy is quite at a near healthy state. Other than profiliation of super capitals most things are getting destroyed pertty consistenly.
I supposed a higher refinery tax (which would almost require 9.0 standigns to nullify) would do worlds of good of encouraging outward growth of eve from high into low as well as lower efficency (overstressed refineries people being croocked) Low secs threshhold should be much lower 5.0 standings or less. Null should be allow to get to perfect relatively easily for allaince level efforts depending on the outposts and upgrades to the outposts.
An isk tax on refining wouldnt be as sensible as mineral loss via mineral tax.
The issue is you do not want to put eve into a position where if you where knocked down back your velator you should be able to recover from it. Empire sales taxes are about to go up, as well as transaction taxes from the SEC. There are alot of monkey wrenches being thorwn back in and at the rate of the economy turmoil we're quickly heading back to a era where deploying a battleship was soemthing you didnt do on a whim because they where replacable.
Carrier losses are going to hurt again. With the frigate boost inbound expect more and more pvpers to migrate twoards bang for the buck options.
So TL;DR version
Isk tax on refines bad idea Higher Mineral Tax on scapping a good idea. Higher Mineral Tax on refining in empire and slightly lower than empire in low also a good idea.
And why would higher MINERAL taxes on modules be better?
CAUSE ONLY NULL BEARS DESERVE ACCESS TO ABC ore minerals!
Your naked selfish is just swell.
|

Ashley SchmidtVonGoldberg
1-800-FUBAR
137
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 19:31:00 -
[39] - Quote
Everyone who agrees does not mine/collect modules
Everyone who hates the idea is a miner/mission runner Standing in for Karn Dulake who was banned for saying bad words |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3701
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 19:38:00 -
[40] - Quote
Ashley SchmidtVonGoldberg wrote:Everyone who agrees does not mine/collect modules
Everyone who hates the idea is a miner/mission runner
Good thing Im neither
|
|

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
274
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 19:43:00 -
[41] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:Ashley SchmidtVonGoldberg wrote:Everyone who agrees does not mine/collect modules
Everyone who hates the idea is a miner/mission runner Good thing Im neither
Nova, I'm curious how you can be neither a miner nor a non-miner.
This seems like a logical fallacy.
Not that I wanted to weaken your stance, mind you.
I just feel I have to call it as I see it. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
531
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 21:38:00 -
[42] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Eve only has 300,000 accounts because every other company is to stupid to make a MMO with spaceships.
I'm choosing to interpret this as "I am now sufficiently butt hurt that I cannot form a coherent argument, I bow to your grace and wisdom Simi Kusoni".
Wise choice, my friend, wise choice.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3702
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 21:46:00 -
[43] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Nova Fox wrote:Ashley SchmidtVonGoldberg wrote:Everyone who agrees does not mine/collect modules
Everyone who hates the idea is a miner/mission runner Good thing Im neither Nova, I'm curious how you can be neither a miner nor a non-miner. This seems like a logical fallacy. Not that I wanted to weaken your stance, mind you. I just feel I have to call it as I see it.
Well we have to go back to the original argument
The guy said he thinks anyone who loves this idea collects modules and does not mine. I love a portion of the idea just have to swap out an noun. Doesnt mean I mine to help reduce costs of what I do in game.
The guy also said he thinks anyone who hates the idea which I do for wholesale is a miner/mission runner.
To label me as such would be an insult to the profession. As old as my character is and for amount of SP he has I shouldnt be losing isk in ethier profession but I do. I on average lose a battleship a month or whatever expensive ship I could afford to mission running mostly to disconnects.
Also you forget I argue both sides often.
|

Kattshiro
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
48
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 21:57:00 -
[44] - Quote
I dont see how this would be a major isk sink... or even dent it in a significant way. We need more people to explode and therefore buy new/more stuff as a proper sink. Or add something to the game (POS addons for example that take more money). This is a kin to a tax on the poor. |

Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
534
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 22:01:00 -
[45] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote: Wow!
You seem very Grumpy. It is not Wise. |

Montevius Williams
Eclipse Industrial Inc Order of the Void
255
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 23:37:00 -
[46] - Quote
This really wouldnt change anything would it? I mean, if Im getting an extra tax, Im just going to pass that tax on to the consumer (assuming isk tax) |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
287
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 04:14:00 -
[47] - Quote
Montevius Williams wrote:This really wouldnt change anything would it? I mean, if Im getting an extra tax, Im just going to pass that tax on to the consumer (assuming isk tax) Now you're thinking about business! He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |