|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Rthor
   |
Posted - 2004.07.10 03:44:00 -
[1]
I think that it would be nice gesture to 425 railgun users and it does not require any changes to tracking formulae.
|
Rthor
|
Posted - 2004.07.10 03:44:00 -
[2]
I think that it would be nice gesture to 425 railgun users and it does not require any changes to tracking formulae.
|
Rthor
|
Posted - 2004.07.10 15:10:00 -
[3]
Lets not get sidetracked by suggestion of the 5km option to warp to another ship. That is not what I am asking at all.
Obviously there are implications on game balance with 60km+ warp, which I why I dont advocate any specific distance.
I am slightly tired of smug interceptor pilots who can easily get to my ship whether I warp 15 or 60 km from a gate. They have speed. Why cant I have the option to warp in so far away from them to have time to toast their asses with my new ubersniper anti matter 425 railguns while they try to close in?
|
Rthor
|
Posted - 2004.07.10 15:10:00 -
[4]
Lets not get sidetracked by suggestion of the 5km option to warp to another ship. That is not what I am asking at all.
Obviously there are implications on game balance with 60km+ warp, which I why I dont advocate any specific distance.
I am slightly tired of smug interceptor pilots who can easily get to my ship whether I warp 15 or 60 km from a gate. They have speed. Why cant I have the option to warp in so far away from them to have time to toast their asses with my new ubersniper anti matter 425 railguns while they try to close in?
|
Rthor
|
Posted - 2004.07.10 19:08:00 -
[5]
Garyus go camp someone else's thread.
Dalman, I see your point. But still I think that it would be more balanced if the interceptors had to fear a battleship warping in too far away from them to be able to close the distance before being locked. Heck I probably would not even use that option but if it was there frigates would have to think about this. As it is I think that the balance is a little skewed against BS.
Either way, you can still do this with bookmarks but its a lot of work and takes advanced preparation so thats why having this as an option would be nice because you would not have to do that work and frigates would still have to fear it.
So this is just an idea.
|
Rthor
|
Posted - 2004.07.10 19:08:00 -
[6]
Garyus go camp someone else's thread.
Dalman, I see your point. But still I think that it would be more balanced if the interceptors had to fear a battleship warping in too far away from them to be able to close the distance before being locked. Heck I probably would not even use that option but if it was there frigates would have to think about this. As it is I think that the balance is a little skewed against BS.
Either way, you can still do this with bookmarks but its a lot of work and takes advanced preparation so thats why having this as an option would be nice because you would not have to do that work and frigates would still have to fear it.
So this is just an idea.
|
Rthor
|
Posted - 2004.07.10 20:58:00 -
[7]
As long as you dont flame me you can stay in my thread and wish for whatever you want.
Here, is not this the best thread ever?
:-)
|
Rthor
|
Posted - 2004.07.10 20:58:00 -
[8]
As long as you dont flame me you can stay in my thread and wish for whatever you want.
Here, is not this the best thread ever?
:-)
|
Rthor
|
Posted - 2004.07.10 22:42:00 -
[9]
god dammit its not the best thread ever anymore.
|
Rthor
|
Posted - 2004.07.10 22:42:00 -
[10]
god dammit its not the best thread ever anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|