|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Prekaz
The Gentlemen's Corporation
14
   |
Posted - 2012.05.02 16:43:00 -
[1] - Quote
Reminds me of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwy_fy5tmf0#t=3m20s
With Akita playing the role of Louis CK and Brewlar playing the role of his 3 year old daughter. |
Prekaz
The Gentlemen's Corporation
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 17:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:NUH UH! THEY'RE PIG NEWTONS!
|
Prekaz
The Gentlemen's Corporation
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 20:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
Akita T wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Buff Invention beyond effortless T2BPO's and I'd be happy. Then shut the frak up about removing T2 BPOs and start saying this ^^^ instead from now on all the freaking time. Something like that at least has a slight chance of happening (maybe not "beyond T2 BPO", but at least close enough), unlike your original demands, which have no chance of happening.
That wouldn't actually change anything for this guy. This is just Dunning Kruger mixed with a gross delusion of entitlement.
He's obviously a really bad industrialist. You can plainly tell from the content of his posts that, to call this guy's grasp of game mechanics and basic economic principles "tenuous" would be an act of titanic generosity.
Here's what he "knows", in a nutshell:
1. Some people make absurd amounts of money from industry.
2. He makes very little from industry.
3. This could not possibly be because of some personal failing and so must surely be the result of some inherent unfairness in the game.
Simply changing the game mechanics that he doesn't understand to other, different mechanics that he still wouldn't understand will not alter his situation because people who do understand the game mechanics will still be beating him bloody at every turn. All of the above will still be true. Other people will still make absurd amounts of money from industry, he will still make extremely mediocre money from industry, and it will still be inconceivable (to him) that this is a personal failure |
Prekaz
The Gentlemen's Corporation
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 20:46:00 -
[4] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
That's it troll and make personal attacks. Please let Akita do the T2BPO supporting as they are the only one on your side that makes any relevent posts regarding T2BPO other than. ''This guys a douche, just because he never got a free T2BPO, why should I give up my one, cry cry cry.''
As stated I have given plenty of reason why T2BPO suck the primary being the unfair way they were seeded/gifted and the fact that they out perform invention which makes zero sense. Invention requires a lot more effort than T2BPO's do and the reward should reflect this.
You do realize that most of the people who think you're an imbecile don't actually own T2 BPOs themselves... right?
I own zero. I owned one once for about 7 hours, because I saw it on contracts at what I concluded to be well below its fair market value. Seven hours later I resold it for a profit that would have been, at a minimum, 3 years worth of actually producing from the print.
I made over 2 billion from production last week, and by "last week" I mean "between Sunday and Wednesday", and I am a far cry from a titan of industry. That is vastly more than most T2 BPOs will produce in a month, and more than many will produce in a year.
Thus, the only conclusion I can possibly reach is that anyone would cry for so long and so hard about the "unfairness" of a such a comparatively dismal earner must simply be exceedingly bad at industry. I have yet to see any indication to the contrary. |
Prekaz
The Gentlemen's Corporation
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 21:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Zifrian wrote:
Open question, why are the marauders not profitable to invent for most players?
I'll let you answer that one.
Because some one with a BPO undercuts them.
PIG NEWTONS! |
Prekaz
The Gentlemen's Corporation
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 21:06:00 -
[6] - Quote
There are no marauder BPOs. Marauders were introduced after the end of the T2 BPO lottery. Marauder BPOs do not exist. None. Nada. Zip. Zilch. Thus, inventors cannot be undercut by BPOs, as you assert.
Would you care to revise your stupid? |
Prekaz
The Gentlemen's Corporation
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 21:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
Now look at an item that has a T2BPO. Not only do you have idiot free miners undercutting you at a loss to yourself and them you also have a T2BPO undercutting you into financial loss while he still spins a profit.
What the...
It's sort of like you just said, "2+2 = popsicle" and someone else corrected you by saying, "No, see, 2+2 = 4. Here, look. || + || = ||||. Get it?"
But you didn't get it. Instead you replied, "No, see... those look kind of like popsicle sticks, therefor 2+2 = popsicle after all." And then someone points out that what something looks like has nothing to do with sums, and your basic response can be reduced to, "Well facts be damned, I'm still right because I say so, so there!"
It's a complete non sequitur. You argue that invention is unprofitable because of BPOs. Someone else points out that in some cases, invention is unprofitable without any BPOs.
You then go on to say, "Well, BPOs make it worse!" while completely ignoring the fact that other items that DO have BPOs are highly profitable to invent.
And, this comes hot on the heels of publicly demonstrating just how little you know about production in the first place. |
Prekaz
The Gentlemen's Corporation
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 21:33:00 -
[8] - Quote
nt |
|
|
| |
|