|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Shadowsword
The Scope Gallente Federation
120
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 19:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Stella SGP wrote:nom nom nom MOAR TEARS! Quotes from supporters of T2BPO. As you can see they are idiots. Still not a single reason for keeping them not one.
Reasons were given in the locked thread, but since they weren't supporting your silly crusade, you ignored them. Keep making a fool of yourself. |
Shadowsword
The Scope Gallente Federation
120
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 21:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
Bluestream3 wrote: Ok. Saying that T2 BPOs are completely irrelevant to inventors is just as much of a logic fail as to say that the minerals I mine are free. Also don't say that no one cares, you seem to care at least a bit since you're writing in this thread and there are several others that do too, me included obviously.
"Completely irrelevant" is an exageration. "Largely irrelevant" would be apt.
Can you name one specific item where inventor margins would be significantly improved if T2 BPOs were removed? (Hint: this is a trap question. Even if you find one, which is doubtful, I have plenty of counter-examples to pick from)
If not, that is empirical evidence that the existence of those BPOs aren't significantly affecting inventors, and so, yes, they are "largely irrelevant". Very far from what this Don Quichotte of an OP is claiming. |
Shadowsword
The Scope Gallente Federation
122
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 05:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
Hint for the economic noobs: Selling price is related to building cost ONLY on very low-demand items, when margins are so razor-thin that most productors give up on supplying the market. For any item with a reasonnable transaction volume, the ONLY thing that determine the selling price is how much buyers are ready to fork out for it. |
Shadowsword
The Scope Gallente Federation
122
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 11:31:00 -
[4] - Quote
When they were seeded, it was 8 BPOs for each T2 ship and 16 BPOs for each T2 module.
Quite a few have been lost since then, bewteen destructions and canceled accounts. |
Shadowsword
The Scope Gallente Federation
122
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 20:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: Exactly and that is the point and you hit the nail on the head. A single inventor can not compete in a single item against a T2BPO owner and that is why T2BPO need removed.
Horsecrap.
You can easily compete with any T2 bpo holder simply by masively outproducing him. A T2 BPO is limited to 1 factory slot. You aren't. |
Shadowsword
The Scope Gallente Federation
122
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 21:49:00 -
[6] - Quote
A long post full of inconvenient facts? He will ignore it. :/ |
|
|
|