| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 14:24:00 -
[1] - Quote
Imagine you could play eve for free but you couldn't:
- Train skills without having paid a subscription or redeemed plex
- Recieve full amounts of any free aurum that CCP gives away
- Run more than one client
Would this help increase the playerbase or retain players without negatively effecting the game and/or CCPs revenue or would it cause more problems than its worth?
|

Mr LaForge
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 14:26:00 -
[2] - Quote
nvm, read it wrong |

VaMei
Meafi Corp
9
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 14:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:Imagine you could play eve for free but you couldn't: - Train skills without having paid a subscription or redeemed plex
- Recieve full amounts of any free aurum that CCP gives away
- Run more than one client
Would this help increase the playerbase or retain players without negatively effecting the game and/or CCPs revenue or would it cause more problems than its worth?
Sounds like a botters dream.
|

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
40
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 14:33:00 -
[4] - Quote
Actually no... that sounds like a really good idea! Particularly when you factor in this brave new world of micro transactions....
It makes perfect sense to me. In fact... this may be the best f*****g idea in the forums.
I can only see two responses (if any) from CCP on this:
1) "Wow... that's a really good idea! Subscription numbers will go up, player population would go up a LOT, and we'll make more money when they start buying skull-time barbie runway model cloths!"
2) F*** the playerbase. We need some of these servers for WoD anyway... lets keep the playerbase manageable and not stress the cluster too much."
...in case you all haven't noticed... there's been a pretty sizable dip in the numbers logged on at any given time. It's still a higher average population than when I started the game... but not by much.
I think this would go a long damn way to popping those numbers up there and beyond the records we've set in the past.
VaMei wrote:Sounds like a botters dream.
It's already a botters dream, look around foo. Worry about making the game better first and going after botters second. ALL GëívGëí Ships | Odd-áGëívGëí Items | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |

T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 14:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
Mr LaForge wrote:nvm, read it wrong
It would effectively extend trial accounts indefinately, but it would also allow people to continue playing for free when they couldn't feed their habit due to lack of time and/or interest. 14 Days isn't always long enough to get into the game nor is it always sufficient time for people to figure out if they're actually into the game or not and could release some of the pressure as you want your free time disappearing.
|

Mixne
More Money More Problems
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 14:39:00 -
[6] - Quote
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:Mr LaForge wrote:nvm, read it wrong It would effectively extend trial accounts indefinately, but it would also allow people to continue playing for free when they couldn't feed their habit due to lack of time and/or interest. 14 Days isn't always long enough to get into the game nor is it always sufficient time for people to figure out if they're actually into the game or not and could release some of the pressure as you want your free time disappearing. VaMei wrote:T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:Imagine you could play eve for free but you couldn't: - Train skills without having paid a subscription or redeemed plex
- Recieve full amounts of any free aurum that CCP gives away
- Run more than one client
Would this help increase the playerbase or retain players without negatively effecting the game and/or CCPs revenue or would it cause more problems than its worth? Sounds like a botters dream. yes this is the biggest problem - although restricting how many clients these accounts could run would alieviate this a little it may not be enough. Any ideas on this?
It would just allow bots to play without even paying. One bot makes enough ISK to purchase a mission ready character, buys the character and continues to bot. A proxy is used or some other program (that will be figured out) to run multiple "free" accounts all farming ISK. Sounds like a bad idea to me. CCP is a business, it's not in their best interest to give away free server resources to people that want to play but not enough to pay.
The upside is that real people might use that time to farm for ISK to buy PLEX. However, 30 days is plenty of time to farm out a PLEX, so just do it while your account is active. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
138
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 14:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
I'm playing EVE for free with no restrictions whatsoever. I prefer that to being restricted.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal made on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players. |

Cipher Jones
37
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 14:49:00 -
[8] - Quote
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:Imagine you could play eve for free but you couldn't: - Train skills without having paid a subscription or redeemed plex
- Recieve full amounts of any free aurum that CCP gives away
- Run more than one client
Would this help increase the playerbase or retain players without negatively effecting the game and/or CCPs revenue or would it cause more problems than its worth?
I can already play Eve for free and don't have to do any of that ****. So why the hypothetical?
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
40
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 14:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:Imagine you could play eve for free but you couldn't: - Train skills without having paid a subscription or redeemed plex
- Recieve full amounts of any free aurum that CCP gives away
- Run more than one client
Would this help increase the playerbase or retain players without negatively effecting the game and/or CCPs revenue or would it cause more problems than its worth? I can already play Eve for free and don't have to do any of that ****. So why the hypothetical? Because the game could then be advertised as Free-To-Play, technically. A marketing coup like this would increase the playerbase significantly. That would solve the dipping numbers problem I'm seeing... but that's just my read on this. It would likely increase revenue for CCP at the same time = more RL ISK to develop the game... ALL GëívGëí Ships | Odd-áGëívGëí Items | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |

T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 14:53:00 -
[10] - Quote
Mixne wrote:VaMei wrote:Sounds like a botters dream. It would just allow bots to play without even paying. One bot makes enough ISK to purchase a mission ready character, buys the character and continues to bot. A proxy is used or some other program (that will be figured out) to run multiple "free" accounts all farming ISK. Sounds like a bad idea to me. CCP is a business, it's not in their best interest to give away free server resources to people that want to play but not enough to pay.
I can't think of anything yet to fix the botting problem, but there will be one somewhere :P
Those players who are interested in WIS (and those that use eve as a chat client like me) could play without paying but they'd still be likely to buy items from the Nex Store to balance the loss of subscription... although I don't think theres enough actual walking around yet to make this likely.
One of the biggest suppliers of content and entertainment in Eve is the playerbase and the more people that get into the game the more likely they are going to want to be on a level playing field with everyone else. While not everyone would end up paying, it would help increase the paying playerbase in the long run but the problem is just as you say; would the increase in paying subscribers outway the loss of resources by the new ones that aren't paying? There are alot of times that the server is way under what it can handle, but you can't control what time people log in :P
Mixne wrote:The upside is that real people might use that time to farm for ISK to buy PLEX. However, 30 days is plenty of time to farm out a PLEX, so just do it while your account is active.
It would allow those that don't have enough time for that month to continue to play without having to worry about the clock ticking down. Saying that, $25NZ a month isn't much :P
|

Cipher Jones
37
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 14:55:00 -
[11] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:Imagine you could play eve for free but you couldn't: - Train skills without having paid a subscription or redeemed plex
- Recieve full amounts of any free aurum that CCP gives away
- Run more than one client
Would this help increase the playerbase or retain players without negatively effecting the game and/or CCPs revenue or would it cause more problems than its worth? I can already play Eve for free and don't have to do any of that ****. So why the hypothetical? Because the game could then be advertised as Free-To-Play, technically. A marketing coup like this would increase the playerbase significantly. That would solve the dipping numbers problem I'm seeing... but that's just my read on this. It would likely increase revenue for CCP at the same time = more RL ISK to develop the game...
Yeah you must be on to something. WoW gained negative nine hundred thousand players when it went f2p. Eve would be great if 900000 players left.
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 14:57:00 -
[12] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:
Yeah you must be on to something. WoW gained negative nine hundred thousand players when it went f2p. Eve would be great if 900000 players left.
lol
Do you have a link to this data? I thought it was because wow is getting old and Rift is P-Cool?
|

VaMei
Meafi Corp
9
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 14:58:00 -
[13] - Quote
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:Those players who are interested in WIS (and those that use eve as a chat client like me) could play without paying but they'd still be likely to buy items from the Nex Store to balance the loss of subscription... although I don't think theres enough actual walking around yet to make this likely.
You'd pay to play dress-up Barbie in a 3d chatroom, but you won't/can't pay for the subscription to actually play the game?
 |

Cipher Jones
37
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:07:00 -
[14] - Quote
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:
Yeah you must be on to something. WoW gained negative nine hundred thousand players when it went f2p. Eve would be great if 900000 players left.
lol Do you have a link to this data? I thought it was because wow is getting old and Rift is P-Cool?
I was just joshin' the OP.
Eve is free to play for many, it just doesn't follow a traditional f2p model. It is next to impossible to start off f2p, but with the purchase of 1 GTC you can avoid a monthly fee forever quite easily.
Advertising Eve as f2p would certainly drive a way a lot of customers. CCP dont need another one of those.
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:07:00 -
[15] - Quote
VaMei wrote:T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:Those players who are interested in WIS (and those that use eve as a chat client like me) could play without paying but they'd still be likely to buy items from the Nex Store to balance the loss of subscription... although I don't think theres enough actual walking around yet to make this likely. You'd pay to play dress-up Barbie in a 3d chatroom, but you won't/can't pay for the subscription to actually play the game? 
I have lots of plex, thats what I use. This idea is about getting new players and retaining old ones that are disillusioned with the game and/or don't have time to seriously play anymore.
hmm.. this effectively turns skill training into a microtransaction :| may the gods have mercy on my soul.
Cipher Jones wrote: Advertising Eve as f2p would certainly drive a way a lot of customers. CCP dont need another one of those.
Yeah, I'd be pretty hesitant about marketing it as F2P. It does seem to give people a negative image about games but theres some good F2P games out there apparently... Microtransactions Crowdsource and Survey |

KaarBaak
20
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:13:00 -
[16] - Quote
Finally! Someone at CCP had the nerve to create a forum alt to send up the F2P test balloon to see how the players react.
Hilmar: give this man a raise and get the devs on this ASAP.
The transition to SOE ownership is moving right on schedule.
|

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:14:00 -
[17] - Quote
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:Imagine you could play eve for free but you couldn't: - Train skills without having paid a subscription or redeemed plex
- Recieve full amounts of any free aurum that CCP gives away
- Run more than one client
Would this help increase the playerbase or retain players without negatively effecting the game and/or CCPs revenue or would it cause more problems than its worth? Playing for "Free" with plex is not techincally playing for free as it costs your time, much like "free" ore.
"Playing for "Free" with plex is not techincally playing for free as it costs your time, much like "free" ore."
With this sentence the rest means walking in circles. Will not change anything except some imaginary perspective of whats what.
|

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
187
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:19:00 -
[18] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:I'm playing EVE for free with no restrictions whatsoever. I prefer that to being restricted.
It's not free if someone else is paying for you.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Crunchmeister
THORN Syndicate BricK sQuAD.
36
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:21:00 -
[19] - Quote
I'd agree that allowing this would be the botter's dream come true... train a toon to do what you need him to do, then let the sub drop, and bot him to pieces. It would only make botting and RMT more profitable.
I think what would be a much better idea (and I mentioned this in another thread) would be that people could log into their accounts, but wouldn't be able to train, UNDOCK, or engage in ISK transactions without a paid sub. They could travel between stations with clones, but not physically undock in a ship.
However, once Incarna rolls out station environments, they would be able to wander the stations, engage in the establishments, etc. Aurum could be the currency for use in stations exclusively. If they're willing to use the MT system to buy AUR, then they could do their business in stations without that affecting the space portion of the game. If they wish to cash in PLEX for game time, then they'd be able to undock and do anything other pilots could do. In a way, this would be more realistic than Eve is now. After all, not everyone in the universe is necessarily a starship pilot.
I think it would attract some new players, and eventually, they would get into the game, because through the social interaction, they would learn of all the cool stuff going on outside of stations. Another thing it could do is allow for members who've dropped their subs to stay in touch with the game and possibly entice them to subscribe again at some point.
The potential down side is that this being a new medium for cashflow, CCP would start diverting more resources towards the WiS aspect of Eve. Unless they added new team members dedicated to this task, the FiS portion would probably suffer as a result, as CCP would try milking the new cash cow for all it's worth. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
40
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:21:00 -
[20] - Quote
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:I have lots of plex, thats what I use. This idea is about getting new players and retaining old ones that are disillusioned with the game and/or don't have time to seriously play anymore.
hmm.. this effectively turns skill training into a microtransaction :| may the gods have mercy on my soul.
Damn, T. Think you nailed it here but not in the way you wanted to...
Those of us floating through on PLEX... we're why they won't do this. 
KaarBaak wrote: Finally! Someone at CCP had the nerve to create a forum alt to send up the F2P test balloon to see how the players react.
Hilmar: give this man a raise and get the devs on this ASAP.
The transition to SOE ownership is moving right on schedule.
This guy isn't a CCP alt... one of the few things in this game I'm sure of.... ALL GëívGëí Ships | Odd-áGëívGëí Items | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |

Tiven loves Tansien
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
256
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:23:00 -
[21] - Quote
chameleon, now dameleon
u need to be creative on your ccp alts' names CCP |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
35
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:27:00 -
[22] - Quote
This is sort of like my idea: a Plex or one subscription gives you a pool of skill points you draw upon when training. Training proceeds as now, the points are just drawn from the pool. And to add a new thing: Allow more than one of your three characters to draw from the pool at the same time.
Edit: About the bot issue: CCP just needs to step up their bot detection efforts and ban them. Its does not matter how much a feature is a "botters dream" if as soon as you activate the bot code every single one of your accounts gets banned, and those bans are against you, the person, and count as strikes against all your accounts, including any new ones you set up or acquire. CCP employees should never proclaim a feature to be awesome. Only subscribers should. |

T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:34:00 -
[23] - Quote
Crunchmeister wrote:I'd agree that allowing this would be the botter's dream come true... train a toon to do what you need him to do, then let the sub drop, and bot him to pieces. It would only make botting and RMT more profitable.
I think what would be a much better idea (and I mentioned this in another thread) would be that people could log into their accounts, but wouldn't be able to train, UNDOCK, or engage in ISK transactions without a paid sub. They could travel between stations with clones, but not physically undock in a ship.
However, once Incarna rolls out station environments, they would be able to wander the stations, engage in the establishments, etc. Aurum could be the currency for use in stations exclusively. If they're willing to use the MT system to buy AUR, then they could do their business in stations without that affecting the space portion of the game. If they wish to cash in PLEX for game time, then they'd be able to undock and do anything other pilots could do. In a way, this would be more realistic than Eve is now. After all, not everyone in the universe is necessarily a starship pilot.
I think it would attract some new players, and eventually, they would get into the game, because through the social interaction, they would learn of all the cool stuff going on outside of stations. Another thing it could do is allow for members who've dropped their subs to stay in touch with the game and possibly entice them to subscribe again at some point.
The potential down side is that this being a new medium for cashflow, CCP would start diverting more resources towards the WiS aspect of Eve. Unless they added new team members dedicated to this task, the FiS portion would probably suffer as a result, as CCP would try milking the new cash cow for all it's worth.
nice post, but there is surely a way to make this benefit ships in space aswell without effecting botting.
On another note, this idea doesn't really detract away from PLEX as people almost always want to get what everyone else does and the hope is that these new players will either get time to earn plex or want to subscribe; unless you have an extremely well skilled character there are always more things to train :P I'd infact expect an increase to Plex purchases sometime after this play method was introduced.
Microtransactions Crowdsource and Survey |

T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:46:00 -
[24] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:This is sort of like my idea: a Plex or one subscription gives you a pool of skill points you draw upon when training. Training proceeds as now, the points are just drawn from the pool.
Exactly how I'd expect it to work. Ie. you don't have to use all your subscription/ plex in one go, you could pause training (probably need a cooldown or set minimum pause here) and maybe a minimum amount of time to use these skill points.
Vincent Athena wrote:And to add a new thing: Allow more than one of your three characters to draw from the pool at the same time.
Yeah, same as having 3 account effectively. Logically theres no reason for it to bad as you'd end up spending the same amount of money in the long run (if you are continously training each of the three characters on that one account) and you'd be penalised slightly as you can't play all three characters at once, which would also reduce server load. CCP "could" make more money out of single accounts in this fashion but If people reduced the amount of accounts because of this there may be some loss.
Vincent Athena wrote:Edit: About the bot issue: CCP just needs to step up their bot detection efforts and ban them. Its does not matter how much a feature is a "botters dream" if as soon as you activate the bot code every single one of your accounts gets banned, and those bans are against you, the person, and count as strikes against all your accounts, including any new ones you set up or acquire.
do ccp antibot measures work? Microtransactions Crowdsource and Survey |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn Warped Aggression
25
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:46:00 -
[25] - Quote
a big NO from me.
botting is already bad no need to make it easier for them.
free to play would effective kill eve markets and just end up like serenity server full of bots farming isk all day. |

Xercodo
Xovoni Directorate
45
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:53:00 -
[26] - Quote
to get rid of bots we need: -Players using the report bot function more -CCP needing to be more transparent with the accused so that the falsely accused can get off -CCP leading operations onto bot hosting sites to root out the problem at the source and if not then be able to instantly detect when a specific bot is used and insta-ban them
Provided that the anti-bot measure were better then I can see some thing sorta like the OP working fine. The Drake is a Lie |

Azahni Vah'nos
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 16:13:00 -
[27] - Quote
Imagine if you could freely do the following:
* Train up characters to certain skill levels with a subscription and then play them for free (was that a cheer I heard from the botters and people wanting to pad out their fleets) * Use the free Aurum on multiple characters to flood the market with items from the Nex store * Run multiple clients on different accounts because it's so hard to setup a different IP address for each
Brilliiant!!! We need to get to work on this straight away ... I'll bring the shovel and the bugle to play the last post for EVE.
|

T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 16:25:00 -
[28] - Quote
Azahni Vah'nos wrote:Imagine if you could freely do the following:
* Train up characters to certain skill levels with a subscription and then play them for free (was that a cheer I heard from the botters and people wanting to pad out their fleets) * Use the free Aurum on multiple characters to flood the market with items from the Nex store * Run multiple clients on different accounts because it's so hard to setup a different IP address for each
Brilliiant!!! We need to get to work on this straight away ... I'll bring the shovel and the bugle to play the last post for EVE.
One and Three are pretty much the same things. I'm sure a company with as many programmers as they have could do something to restrict multiple clients on a single pc or network. [cough]
Free Aurum I covered, you'd either disallow these accounts from receiving free Aurum or give them only a percentage.
Microtransactions Crowdsource and Survey |

Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
15
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 16:32:00 -
[29] - Quote
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote: Would this help increase the playerbase or retain players without negatively effecting the game and/or CCPs revenue or would it cause more problems than its worth?
What's the point of this? Keeping bitter vets around? They already have enough PLEX/isk to stick around for most of the next decade should they choose to do so.
So what's the point - farming or free alts? |

Crunchmeister
THORN Syndicate BricK sQuAD.
39
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 17:33:00 -
[30] - Quote
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:nice post, but there is surely a way to make this benefit ships in space aswell without effecting botting.
On another note, this idea doesn't really detract away from PLEX as people almost always want to get what everyone else does and the hope is that these new players will either get time to earn plex or want to subscribe; unless you have an extremely well skilled character there are always more things to train :P I'd infact expect an increase to Plex purchases sometime after this play method was introduced.
I tend to see the WiS portion of Eve almost as a separate game, tied in more closely to Dust than Eve's FiS game. And like Dust, this would rely on the FTP concept using Aurum as a separate currency. Making the FiS part of Eve FTP would change the model of the game completely, and would eventually involve microtransactions that would allow people with more real money to gain an unfair advantage over people playing the game with a time investment.
That's the part I'm completely against. And I can't see how we could have a FTP model in Eve with MT to drive it without doing exactly that, or giving more leeway to botters that are already a huge problem, whether or not CCP acknowledges that. I don't want people to be able to buy skills with money, to buy items in game with money, etc. And giving people the option for FTP and still being able to undock and participate in the regular space activities would require just that.
Perhaps there could be a separate skill tree available for the FTP WiS part of Eve, where for money / AUR / PLEX people could purchase a finite amount of training points to improve their skills at running establishments, etc. But I would be disappointed to see that option available for the FiS part of the game.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |