|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Rhadamantine
Game Community
|
Posted - 2008.12.09 06:40:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Goumindong I resent your allegations that I am somehow "biased" towards the ships I fly
Still, can't miss the fact that it's true, resentment or not. But hey, as your so important to the balancing of this game, we understand.
Regards. Rhadamantine. |
Rhadamantine
Game Community
|
Posted - 2008.12.10 06:30:00 -
[2]
I can't believe you're all falling for Goum's trolling still.
I can imagine having a discussion with him face to face, you would put you point forward, but at the same time his fingers would be in his ears and he'd be saying lalalalalalalalalala.
Regards. Rhadamantine. |
Rhadamantine
Game Community
|
Posted - 2009.01.01 23:13:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Kagura Nikon Sorry goug but you are certainly wrong on the overheating issues. The increase in tackling from 20 km to 28 km nullified the " LOL why bother to have dps over 20 km" argument. You can keep a point overheated for 6 minutes or MORE, usually way more, before it get close to critical damage on a battleship. Go and test it. So that is enough time to make a hell lot of difference. Before that an armageddon would have to get to 19.5 km to attack a megatron, against 28 (effective overheated range is 28800m). At 19 km an armageddon is dangerously close to be overtaken into blaster range. At 27-28 km. Its piece of cake. If you really think 8 km extra tackling make no difference. You should maybe go pvp a bit more , seriously, no offense intended. But you should also try to explain why everybody used to pay a leg and their mother for a 28 km point before T2 disrupters and overheat.
I am not going to bother to discuss directly with you because its never productive. But if you pay attention how my argumentation was much better received by both sides than yours, you could learn a bit, if not about how this game really works, and how people really fight, then at least abou how to perform a discussion and an argumentation.
This tbh
Regards. Rhadamantine. |
Rhadamantine
Game Community
|
Posted - 2009.01.02 13:12:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Goumindong More twists and turns.....
You've done nothing but play word games through the whole thread. Someone shows a graph detailing something is white, you then twist words and info to show it's actually black. (But anyone with a brain can still see it's white.)
A typical post from yourself...
Originally by: Goumindong
Originally by: Venkul Mul
Prerequisites don't require 15 minutes.
Yes, they do. Spec 1 in any size requires ~15 minutes. Tops a week if you have to train the whole gamut.
Word play at it's best, but disingenuous all the same. (Whole thread can be found HERE)
I've read many replies from you in many threads, most twist facts and words. Troll comes to mind, but I'll leave others to decide if the tag fits you.
Regards. Rhadamantine. |
Rhadamantine
Game Community
|
Posted - 2009.01.02 13:17:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Can't belive goum hasn't given up on you people yet.
Actually, I was thinking the same thing about the others. You and Goum are like peas in a pod.
Regards. Rhadamantine. |
Rhadamantine
Game Community
|
Posted - 2009.01.02 13:58:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Too bad your theory is bogus. Goum was one of the few that on sisi consistently pointed out that locus rigs should get nerfed and they did the following patch. He is not biased. Get cracking at a new fail theory mate.
So because he knew the stacking was borked on those rigs, we should believe everything he says. With or without him, they would have been changed.
Peas in a pod.
Regards. Rhadamantine. |
Rhadamantine
Game Community
|
Posted - 2009.01.02 22:44:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Goumindong
Originally by: Rhadamantine Peas in a pod.
No. Murina claimed that I was biased towards attempting to "sideways buff them by nerfing other systems"
I lobbied directly for a change that would damage the strength of Amarr ships most. That it was widely known to be a "bug"(well, not really, but pretty widely accepted, "attached to a defect" doesn't actually mean something is a bug it just means that the specific report has been cataloged.) is of no consequence. Its an action conflicting with the supposed motive.
It is unlikely that it would have changed had people who could actually do things about it[and didn't know it wasn't fixed] were not informed
You lobbied, along with others, regarding the incorrect formula implementation on the Locus rigs. The fact is, it would have been sorted whether you were involved or not. Murina never mentioned Locus rigs in his/her post, you'll find Lyria brought them up in the conversation. You and Lyria seemed to have forgotten, (again) that this thread was about close range guns.
But hey, I don't mind you and your buddies telling us just how important you are to game balancing. Hell, you're doing such a good job at word games in this thread. I expect in the next patch, we'll see a massive boost to Amarr Pulse weapon systems.
Regards. Rhadamantine. |
Rhadamantine
Game Community
|
Posted - 2009.01.02 23:11:00 -
[8]
A numbered response, wow. So, you're importance in game balancing, (re: Locus rigs) means that you're not bias towards Amarr. Because those rigs only helped Amarr ships right? Oh wai....
Putting the old Locus chestnut argument into the mix, doesn't hide the massive bias coconut sat behind it. Word games, see we can all play.
Regards. Rhadamantine. |
Rhadamantine
Game Community
|
Posted - 2009.01.02 23:16:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Goumindong
No word games, just simple evidence. Now stop trolling and provide a real argument that hinges on the facts of the case.
Well, I'm waiting......
Regards. Rhadamantine. |
Rhadamantine
Game Community
|
Posted - 2009.01.03 00:12:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Goumindong
Originally by: Rhadamantine
Well, I'm waiting......
Start at the beginning and read my posts from there.
I have, that's why I'm still waiting. For you! Throughout the thread, you have played word games and your bias shines through. Trying too hard to convince people you're not bias, only pushes them the other way. Reminds me of this little gem..."The lady doth protest too much, methinks."
I am finding this all rather funny though tbh.
Regards. Rhadamantine. |
|
|
|
|