| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Minigin
Caldari
coracao ardente
Triumvirate.
   |
Posted - 2008.12.08 16:03:00 -
[1]
having not read a single word in this thread let me preach to you the problem with this game.
problem one... invention.
cheep t2 items are the worst thing that happend to this game. we have total morons flying around in ships with maxed capabilities and being able to replace them in a heartbeat.
i am of the opinion that if you cant keep your ship alive you should have some real dificulty replacing it.
problem two... rigs and t1 insurance.
no real risk flying a fleet bs. rigs prodomenantly used for extra tanking with no real adverse side effects.
problem three... jump bridges.
yes... lets make 0.0 risk free... there can be no real problems with this surely... furthermore lets make it nice and easy for massive blobs to move around their space defending it.
problem four... people.
we can complain about all the other things all we want... but tbh... its the player base that makes this game. until people realise that this is a game... and dont run around naping everyone in sight so they can keep carebearing and go around saying to their wives and children "hey i made 1 billion today" "what you got a job?" "no honey im still playing eve" yah screw you thats right im a ****ing kid but at least im playing this a game not as a second rl.
like seriously just change your faces and get back into skirmishes rather than this whole "OH GOD TCF COME TAKE THIS SPACE SO THAT WE CAN JERK EACH OTHER OFF AND NEVER BE THREATEND BY ANYONE!"
no instead i say "lets set everyone neut and go for our lives!"
but what am i saying... most of you have no rl's so depend on success in this game to go to sleep at night saying "ah i achieved something" rather than "ah i had fun"
so go diaf...
oh man im totaly getting a caod ban for this... but whatever... and you all know its ****ing true!
ps. no more rum... its a pirates drink!
.
MINIGIN! The original colour poster - now surrounding you in limegreen.
|
Minigin
Caldari
coracao ardente
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.12.08 16:11:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: K Shara
Darknesss emo whine thread spotted 
seriously just go join the NC about it... im not even going to complain anymore...
.
MINIGIN! The original colour poster - now surrounding you in limegreen.
|
Minigin
Caldari
coracao ardente
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.12.10 10:11:00 -
[3]
i am now posting in limegreen to support the removal of standings in eve.
.
MINIGIN! The original colour poster - now surrounding you in limegreen.
|
Minigin
Caldari
coracao ardente
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.12.10 10:31:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Minigin on 10/12/2008 10:32:47
Originally by: Zackalwe
Edited by: Zackalwe on 10/12/2008 09:52:51
Originally by: Malcanis
Originally by: Zackalwe
Edited by: Zackalwe on 10/12/2008 09:07:22
I think it would be beneficial to wait for the next expansion, to see how that impacts the big alliances.
The next expansion "T3" should relieve some of the problems we are seeing. The big alliances are going to be fighting over "wormhole space" to try to control T3. Which will leave oppertunity for smaller alliances to get a foothold in 0.0
Strategically speaking, how will these wormholes be any different from r64 moons? Large alliances hold moons in nearly empty regions already, via jump-bridge networks.
As far as I understood, wormhole space cant be soved up like normal space, it has to be defended. Also multiple wormholes from different regions might lead to the same wormhole space, just from different entrances.
So for instance you could have a wormhole from Tribute leading to the same wormhole space as the wormhole that BOB found in Delve. Thats a hell of a fight if the T3 resources is worth as much as I think it will be.
Also if you put more NPC space between regions you cant use jumpbridges to cross multiple regions as easily.
Another possibility for wormhole space:
It may be impossible to jump caps through wormholes. If that were the case, suddenly you would have alliances like Tri interested for the fight alone. Imagine a region of space without titans or caps, without POSes with just a whole load of expensive T3 resources ready to be fought over.
Disclaimer: I dont know if this is what is planned, but it would seen reasonable.
You could for instance find a smaller wormhole to a region from say, empire or lowsec, that is only big enough to fit cruisers and HACs through...
yes that would be fantastic for all of 2 months until a super coalition decides to move close to the edge of that space and effectivly control the entire thing.
i used to complain to alliance leaders about having too many standings... i think it would be prudent and fun of ccp to remove standings from the game.
Darknesss > viva le revolution!
tbh.
.
MINIGIN! The original colour poster - now surrounding you in limegreen.
|
Minigin
Caldari
coracao ardente
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.12.10 10:34:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Privavarian
I liked you better when you were still a hydra muppet, minigin
i still am a hydra muppet tbh :hydra:
.
MINIGIN! The original colour poster - now surrounding you in limegreen.
|
Minigin
Caldari
coracao ardente
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.12.10 10:41:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Varrakk
Is removing standings the way to go?
But it would still need a make over.
Not sure how to type this and make sense 
Wouldnt making space harder and less profitable to hold,
remove the need for coalitions?
If a alliance was unable to hold more then 1 region without running into a massive logistical nightmare, it wouldnt need to rely as heavily on others to defend space they couldnt hold by them self.
In addition, I would change the distance between regions.
Making it very difficult for capitals to travel between them and at the same time, deal with the Jump Bridge Networks.
damn im posting a lot today... but anyway, i think making it harder to hold large areas prolly wont break up coalitions... it would just create more of them i think.
for example youll have all of these alliances holding a couple of constelations each all the while inviting new alliances to come and take other constellations and aid in the defence of others.
also i mean if we really look at it... making space more expencive to hold isnt that big an issue. most of these super coalitions have been carebearing for years!
i hardly think they are that strapped for isk as it is. so pretty much they have no real reason to be blue to each other any more than to make even more isk.
so seeing as they wont drop standings for themselves i personaly rkn itd be pretty nifty for ccp to do it for them. who knows... they might actually have fun! :tinfoil:
.
MINIGIN! The original colour poster - now surrounding you in limegreen.
|
| |
|