|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Phelaen
Amarr
Under the Wings of Fury
Atrocitas
   |
Posted - 2008.12.08 14:13:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Wollari
Yes, but poses still produce a huge amount of ISK. And if this won't change too, the posses will still be something big to fight for and keep alive.
If someday the Sov Holding Feature would be removed from the posses to something different, perhaps we should combine Sov with pos mining. For example: a moon harvester will only give max 25% of their minerals if the alliance don't hold sov and 100% with Sov 3 ( 50% with Sov 2 and 75% with Sov 2)
Then the alliance must keep the sov to hold the moons and make the big money out of their space. This will keep the fights for sov but moves the fights from the pos warfare to something different.
I know that then most calculations for reactions will fail, but you must have a goal to fight for, and it should not be pos warfare.
I would rather fight for something that my opponnent would get lesser money out of their moons. It should also be possible to let the sov drop from 3 to 2 if an assault to a single sovereignty holding point was successful and a full drop if you've had a successfull assault on several points. so you've the time to get it back to 3 in a shorter time rather then 6 weeks.
so we make new assault points?? that doesnt change anything just moves the problem from attacking posses to attacking new assault points. and this moon mineral thing would just make all the larger alliances that can hold sov richer while all small alliances that do some low end to medium end moon mineral mining in low sec will not make any more isk at all.
|
Phelaen
Amarr
Under the Wings of Fury
Atrocitas
|
Posted - 2008.12.08 14:24:00 -
[2]
- no more jumpbridges...
- make ALOT more 0.0 NPC space i mean add 5 more regions. it will help smaller alliances most.
I agree that people will blob if something is worth defending. but something thats also ok just not as good as some of the other regions is still worth defending for smaller alliances that cant get any of the really good stuff. dont put any high end moon minerals in it though.. or they will all show up again :P
|
Phelaen
Amarr
Under the Wings of Fury
Atrocitas
|
Posted - 2008.12.08 14:41:00 -
[3]
Originally by: harry beanbag
Edited by: harry beanbag on 08/12/2008 14:30:39
removing logistics and jump bridges and such are not the answer. All that would do is maybe delay the blob by a day or 2.
Honestly i think its the high end moons. i say make them more available in emipre and lowsec, crash the market for dyps and prom and you'll see a less need for the super blob. CCP stated they want people to move out of empire and play in 00 but without the income generated by the people already holding space, you cant match them in a long scale engagement. Its too easy for people already holding territory to replace their losses which also makes them that much more harder to remove.
edit: i agree with the poster above me about adding more NPC 00 regions. I think that would definitely help the younger new to 00 alliances make a spot for themselves in eve.
delaying the blob and making logistics harder by removing the jump bridges makes it so that even the largest alliance will have more trouble covering all their borders, since the huge blob will just arrive to late if they don't spread it out to more systems. eventually that will result in them choosing to own less space, giving smaller entities a chance to own something
I agree with the moons. at 50k a unit a dysprosium moon makes 840m a week. that's just to much for something that requires no TIME investment, just 800m or so for a good defended pos.
|
|
|
| |
|