EVE Search - List of names from exploit need to be revealed

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

List of names from exploit need to be revealed

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Mei Ree	Posted - 2008.12.11 23:54:00 - [31] The accounts were banned, assets were seized, now we just need to hear that the bug was actually fixed. After the bug is fixed, the economy will sort itself out. Someone might have a huge stockpile of Ferrogel in various outposts through nullsec, but that will be used up eventually. If they were to try to influence the market with it, they'd burn through it faster. The upshot of this is that sending Dysprosium moon POS into reinforced mode will now actually have an effect on the market like it was intended to. So can we get back to playing the game?
Pooka Caldari United Space Aillance USA	Posted - 2008.12.11 23:56:00 - [32] Originally by: Kiara Tirona Just the names of the corps and alliances will do. And which CCP employees were part of the corps / alliances!! Wonder which one T20 is a memmber of.... If any CCP personnel knew of this, then it is time for the CCP CEO to put a stop to them playing!! just my 2 cents PROMISES MADE PROMISES KEPT BRING THE BRIGHT STAR BACK!!! COUNTRY FIRST
Zeba Minmatar Pator Tech School	Posted - 2008.12.11 23:57:00 - [33] Originally by: Mei Ree The accounts were banned, assets were seized, now we just need to hear that the bug was actually fixed. After the bug is fixed, the economy will sort itself out. Someone might have a huge stockpile of Ferrogel in various outposts through nullsec, but that will be used up eventually. If they were to try to influence the market with it, they'd burn through it faster. The upshot of this is that sending Dysprosium moon POS into reinforced mode will now actually have an effect on the market like it was intended to. So can we get back to playing the game? Srry, Scandal WeekÖ still has a few days left before people run out of new ways to poast the same drivel and every argument becomes circular. inappropriate signature. ~WeatherMan
Destination SkillQueue Are We There Yet	Posted - 2008.12.12 00:04:00 - [34] Originally by: Zeba Srry, Scandal WeekÖ still has a few days left before people run out of new ways to poast the same drivel and every argument becomes circular. True. We are at a phase where the CCP news article is copied to an external site and then reposted here, so we can discuss the "new" development.
Chubby Cheeks	Posted - 2008.12.12 00:09:00 - [35] ive heard that this bug was going on for some time, at least 6 months. There must be alot of offenders and 70 is just the tip of the iceberg. I think the real thing people should be asking for is that ALL offenders be banned and not just some of them. I would also bet that every major alliance has probably had some people exploiting this way and i think CCP should be very careful to not show bias, turning a blind eye to favoured alliance and targeting undesireable alliances instead
Robinete Broadhead Minmatar	Posted - 2008.12.12 00:18:00 - [36] Originally by: Chubby Cheeks ive heard that this bug was going on for some time, at least 6 months. There must be alot of offenders and 70 is just the tip of the iceberg. I think the real thing people should be asking for is that ALL offenders be banned and not just some of them. I would also bet that every major alliance has probably had some people exploiting this way and i think CCP should be very careful to not show bias, turning a blind eye to favoured alliance and targeting undesireable alliances instead And as everyone knows there are CCP employees playing and that they are in every majior allaince. Did they know about this?? will they get banned? where did it say 70 players got baned? Yes, I am an ALT in a NOOB Corp.
Washell Olivaw	Posted - 2008.12.12 00:20:00 - [37] Most reliable and logical rumor puts the exploit at alchemy, which was introduced a little over a month ago. Originally by: Signature Everybody has a photographic memory, some people just don't have film.
Neth'Rae Gallente Decorum Inc	Posted - 2008.12.12 00:26:00 - [38] Ok, ok! I admit!!!!1 I once bought a tech 2 itam, it was a cap recharger II I do Sigs, Banners and other Graphics for ISK. Click Here!
Impact	Posted - 2008.12.12 00:42:00 - [39] I dont think the characters name should be given out. There right to privacy. If they wanna make and alt and come on and say they were banned then thats there choice. But CCP dosent have to report to you, or anyone else whos been banned or why. The only reason you found out about this mass ban is because its CCP setting an example and hoping to scare people away from doing the exploit. And anyone not caught to stop it before they lose there account. But people have a right to privacy. And its none of your buisness what happeneds to anyones account but your own.
Weazy Trip	Posted - 2008.12.12 01:24:00 - [40] Originally by: Impact But people have a right to privacy. You obviously dont live in America.
Minmatar Citizen 290574	Posted - 2008.12.12 01:25:00 - [41] Originally by: KrampfyV1 so anyone who has bought "tainted" tech 2 items in the last 4 years should be named and shamed? from the sounds of how big this is.. if u use t2 u most likely have tainted material
Davina Braben	Posted - 2008.12.12 01:29:00 - [42] I spent my tainted ISK on hookers and gin.
MMXMMX Caldari	Posted - 2008.12.12 01:32:00 - [43] Edited by: MMXMMX on 12/12/2008 01:45:11 Just kidding mode : "By 2008, the market has become completely EXPLOIT-driven, and that's where I came in," says Gu=mundsson during an Edinburgh International Festival session. "The whole economic structure has become so complex, the data so vast, that a specialist was needed." Quote from this Linkage Just kidding mode :
Verx Interis Amarr Modicus Dementis	Posted - 2008.12.12 01:39:00 - [44] No need to release a list.. Seeing as all the major alliances are about to be in the classic GBC vs Someone war, we just have to see who's significantly worse than they were previously. If BoB get owned hard, BoB were doing it. if NC seem to have forgotten how to own like they did in M-O, they were doing it. Just have to watch. ---- Logins required for this post: 610759 Modicus Dementis is recruiting, join the channel Internet Cafe
PROTOCOL	Posted - 2008.12.12 01:46:00 - [45] Quote: And which CCP employees were part of the corps / alliances!! Wonder which one T20 is a memmber of Does it matter? He left ccp to go work for realtime worlds. Go back to your moms basement and put your tinfoil hat back on.
Spurty Caldari Technologic Dance	Posted - 2008.12.12 01:55:00 - [46] I'm completely stuffed from all the popcorn I've been eating reading this stuff. fantastic work! Would love to know what it is we are supposed to do with the info if CCP were to divulge the cheaters. You going to create banners and posters and go walk down your local high street to protest then? Just going to have to wait and see EVE settle down again and see if its still as crazy to have these big power blocks rampaging in their nap fests or if people will spot that there's really nothing in being a pet and hey, why not take it all for themselves ;0 0.0 lacks anarchy, higher percentage of blues out there than in EMPIRE!
Bloody Rabbit Jita Miners	Posted - 2008.12.12 02:34:00 - [47] Originally by: Weazy Trip Originally by: Solomon XI I would love alliance names if they directly benefited from this with outposts & super-capitals. If this is the case - I want their 0.0 Sov wiped. This tbqh. And if it doesn't concern you stop posting in this thread please. I aggree with this, if the cheaters were using the space of a 0.0 alliance that alliance needs to be punished for this. If an alliance collected rent from the cheaters then those alliances need to be punished. CCP, the players are losing faith in you. I hope in the next week or so you do the right thing and reveal the names and corps and alliances and you punish them. Punishing the alliances also include wiping out player stations if you find that the trail of isk was used to build those stations.
Bloody Rabbit Jita Miners	Posted - 2008.12.12 02:40:00 - [48] Originally by: Impact I dont think the characters name should be given out. There right to privacy. If they wanna make and alt and come on and say they were banned then thats there choice. But CCP dosent have to report to you, or anyone else whos been banned or why. The only reason you found out about this mass ban is because its CCP setting an example and hoping to scare people away from doing the exploit. And anyone not caught to stop it before they lose there account. But people have a right to privacy. And its none of your buisness what happeneds to anyones account but your own. Players that have tried to ruin the game for us all do not have rights. As for what is and isn't our business, its our business how this game world is ran. If we don't like it we will speak up. If we still don't like it we express ourselves on 3rd party sites and quit the game. And we make sure that players thinking about joining the game know why we left, if you don't think that is power, then go look at the 3rd party sites about a game called Ultima Online aka UO.
Faife Noctiscion	Posted - 2008.12.12 02:52:00 - [49] i bought vagabonds after their price collapsed down. i then used them badly and got blown up, shaming the name. but i could afford it since they were so cheap please don't ban me all powerful alt OP -- i am a humble and inefficient ammo to dps converter
Dulcinea Toboso	Posted - 2008.12.12 03:02:00 - [50] Confirming I am the anonymous exploiter referenced in the OP.
Ka Dargo Evolution Band of Brothers	Posted - 2008.12.12 03:09:00 - [51] Originally by: Weazy Trip I think I speak for a majority of the community when I say that the names of the people exploiting the pos mechanics should be revealed. The alliances who have been profiting off of this should receive DOCUMENTED punishment including dissolution. Anyone who has received isk, ships, or equipment from the actions of the exploiters should have them destroyed and should be named as accomplices. Anonymity is not an option in a situation where the actions of a few have impacted such a large community. Ill gotten gains (from exploits, not scams) should not be allowed in Eve. /signed I would like to thank Ms Trip on behalf of the "majority of the community". The unique and well thought out plan she has put forward, was far too good for the likes of that 45 page behemoth everyone else is posting in. Stand tall, stand proud.

CCP Applebabe	Posted - 2008.12.12 04:19:00 - [52] Locked. Please continue the discussion in the official thread. Thank you. Applebabe Community Representative CCP Games, EVE Online Email / Netfang


Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.