|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Crackuji
Gallente
   |
Posted - 2009.01.09 23:19:00 -
[1]
The moon exploit is now a 90-page thread. I think some people want to know - was there any conclusion to this, without reading 90 pages? Did CCP accept responsibility or was it swept under the rug like the T20 incident?
Not being a troll, some inquiring people want to know 
|
Crackuji
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.01.09 23:29:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Lui Kai
So...since they've chosen to not answer to a 90+ page thread in the appropriate forum, you're of the opinion that your making a thread over here is more likely to get a response?
OK, so they never replied to a 90-page thread. In that case, let's just forget about the whole fuggin thing! No harm done, eh? |
Crackuji
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.01.10 00:24:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Vikarion
If you're expecting them to release the names and addresses of the offenders, think again
What in the f..., who said anything about that?
I read the blog a month ago and it still leaves a lot of question unanswered, such as:
Quote:
Pattern asked if they could put that number into isk terms or into the likely increase or effect on the market that would now ensue after the bugÆs correction. Diagoras stated that they canÆt give isk numbers currently as it required further data mining.
Quote:
4. How much contraband resources were produced through this exploit, and how big a share of the overall production is this? EyjoG stated that the exact numbers werenÆt known currently, but will be part of the entire investigation
Quote:
Meissa asked how far the current database extends. EyjoG responded that different data sets go back to different time periods, and as an example they know the exploit existed earlier than March, but they havenÆt been able to find anyone using the exploit earlier than that yet. However they need to restore the older data so that they can mine it to see if people were using it earlier and stopped.
This is only a small selection. The ignored thread in question is here
|
Crackuji
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.01.10 00:45:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Venkul Mul
Probably we will see a further report after the next meeting with the CSM.
WE WERE NOT AWARE OF THE PLAYERS' ACTIONS LOLOLOL
|
|
|
| |
|