| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Monti Reagan
Altruism.
Avarice.
   |
Posted - 2009.02.05 21:09:00 -
[1]
This is about as good a time as ever for CCP to revamp the less than adequate alliance management system.
- Directors should NOT be able to kick corporations from Alliances unless a special role is given
- There should be an alliance wallet
- Holding corp CEO's should be able to appoint Alliance Directors without them having to join a holding corp
- Towers dropped BY ALLIANCE rather then BY CORPORATION should be able to be managed by holding corp designated personnel rather then trying to find someone online from x,y,z corp because so and so forgot to put stront in the tower
Just to name a few. I'm sure other people have more suggestions. Also, this topic was posted here as it seemed very relevant to the big issue at hand.
Thanks. |
Devian 666
Igneus Auctorita
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.02.05 21:11:00 -
[2]
So what you're saying is that you want to remove fun from the game. How boring.
I like the idea of an alliance wallet. That makes it far easier to steal everything.
http://obeythekitten.com/ |
Atropos Kahn
Caldari
Solarflare Heavy Industries
|
Posted - 2009.02.05 21:12:00 -
[3]
Doing any of that will make the Alliance the central part of the game, and not the corporation. So you basically weaken the power of the corp. Alliances are too powerfull as it is.
|
|
CCP Mitnal
C C P
CCP
|
Posted - 2009.02.05 21:17:00 -
[4]
Moved to Features & Ideas.
Mitnal
Community Representative
CCP Hf, EVE Online
Email |
|
Monti Reagan
Altruism.
Avarice.
|
Posted - 2009.02.05 21:19:00 -
[5]
 Originally by: Atropos Kahn
Doing any of that will make the Alliance the central part of the game, and not the corporation. So you basically weaken the power of the corp. Alliances are too powerfull as it is.
This is an interesting claim, but in what way would it weaken the corporation? Corporations would continue to function as they always have within alliances, but rather then having to create clunky and unnecessary holding corporations with certain people being allowed in the initial holding corporation would simply appoint people with alliance management access. This would expedite the alliance management system and make it less susceptible to potential abuses. Anyone who has ever been in an alliance knows that sometimes it's hard to get someone to hop onto their holding character in the middle of an Op when standings need to be set, or find someone from a corporation who's tower that's claiming sov for the allianec runs out of fuel.
If anything, this would strengthen corporations because it would allow CEO characters from member corporations to be put directly in alliance director positions without having to move a holding character over, etc and they would have access to communal resources more easily.
|
Smurphy1
StarRiders Inc.
Fuzzy Logec
|
Posted - 2009.02.05 21:20:00 -
[6]
CCP please fix alliance and pos mechanics. People have been wanting these fixed for years and while adding tech 3 might be nice and all the events of yesterday show how screwed up they are.
|
Monti Reagan
Altruism.
Avarice.
|
Posted - 2009.02.05 21:33:00 -
[7]
CCP might want to consider also at least sending a mail regarding when the alliance bill needs to be paid every month.. |
Agrilad
|
Posted - 2009.02.05 22:11:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Monti Reagan
CCP might want to consider also at least sending a mail regarding when the alliance bill needs to be paid every month..
Actually they do. To every corp ceo in the alliance I believe.
|
Reiisha
Splint Eye Probabilities Inc.
Dawn of Transcendence
|
Posted - 2009.02.05 22:14:00 -
[9]
Would be simpler to introduce shares as a more viable controlling mechanic, at least for the first one. Maybe introduce alliances shares, or at least use the executor corp shares and make the only way to kick a corp voting, with a 75% minimum needed. Or something similar.
EVE History Wiki
|
SpaceSlag
Gallente
the undivided
Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2009.02.05 22:38:00 -
[10]
Something's already been posted for the CSM to work on here.
Become a pirate without fear of death!
|
|
|
Nnamuachs
Caldari
Kiith Paktu
Veneratio Venator Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.02.05 22:51:00 -
[11]
The alliance structure works no differently than that of a corp structure... the "Executor Corp" is the same as an alliance level CEO entity for the whole alliance. As long as there are no roles a CEO is not required to wait or vote on removing members of his corporation. If there was such a "cool down period" or a vote to kick a corp from an alliance, this would buy the corp time to organize a coupe and take over the alliance, putting more power in the members hands than the executors.
Did you mean there "shouldn't" be an alliance wallet? because there is. And again, only executor corp has access to spend anything from it.
Why cant the people just make alts and toss them in the holding corp, its not that difficult and is far more common a thing to do.
There is no such thing as "alliance" towers (as far as i'm personally aware)... all towers are corporate level with settable permissions for alliance use. Alliance members can be given access as necessary.
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |