EVE Search - Triple A fight

All Channels

EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion

Triple A fight

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
GS Tenebraren	Posted - 2009.02.08 17:39:00 - [1] anybody explain this fight - 3 of their ships dissapeared without a single blow.. whats up ? or it is lags on Eve TV, and i simple miss something :)
Acinonyx Jubatus Sebiestor tribe	Posted - 2009.02.08 17:44:00 - [2] Edited by: Acinonyx Jubatus on 08/02/2009 17:56:43 4 rokhs doing a cap transfer dance, the vulture, plus the 2 crows. The crows wound up dying due to the huginn/rapier, atleast one did, but the other died shortly prior. 1 of the Rokh's DC'd/vanished. After the one rokh vanished eventually something happened, guess they had cap issues, but they shortly dropped due to unable to tank(from the looks of it anyways) the rokhs dropped. Once the one rokh left, they kind of folded. Then the bovines started work on the lonely vulture. Note: There have been a couple of people complaining about lag/choppy feed right around the time the fight started... perhaps it's related? Also fixed and properized my post since... who knows, maybe TT's to blame, yeah I blame our queen.
Tyrrax Thorrk Amarr Guiding Hand Social Club	Posted - 2009.02.08 17:49:00 - [3] they had a rokh CTD, after that rest couldn't tank bad luck, i think they would've won if he hadn't
GS Tenebraren	Posted - 2009.02.08 17:52:00 - [4] thank you, it`s more clearly right now... but i think this is not so simple... however, luck - is great factor :)
Pipboy2K Divine Retribution Sons of Tangra	Posted - 2009.02.08 18:04:00 - [5] i still think this idea was somewhat stupid. sure, having no cap problems is nice... but that doenst mean you can permatank 2k+ dps on a shieldtanking ship. theres no crystal imps, no faction invus/deadspace hardeners/deadspace shield boosters and amplifiers in the turney... so you hardly reach the point where you can maybe permatank a gankmegathron (1.2k dps) but what when 3 abaddons fire at you? or even 10 navy caracals? melting rokhs that is War, war never changes
domadworkkid	Posted - 2009.02.08 18:06:00 - [6] Originally by: Pipboy2K i still think this idea was somewhat stupid. sure, having no cap problems is nice... but that doenst mean you can permatank 2k+ dps on a shieldtanking ship. theres no crystal imps, no faction invus/deadspace hardeners/deadspace shield boosters and amplifiers in the turney... so you hardly reach the point where you can maybe permatank a gankmegathron (1.2k dps) but what when 3 abaddons fire at you? or even 10 navy caracals? melting rokhs that is ur dum
Pipboy2K Divine Retribution Sons of Tangra	Posted - 2009.02.08 18:13:00 - [7] Originally by: domadworkkid Originally by: Pipboy2K i still think this idea was somewhat stupid. sure, having no cap problems is nice... but that doenst mean you can permatank 2k+ dps on a shieldtanking ship. theres no crystal imps, no faction invus/deadspace hardeners/deadspace shield boosters and amplifiers in the turney... so you hardly reach the point where you can maybe permatank a gankmegathron (1.2k dps) but what when 3 abaddons fire at you? or even 10 navy caracals? melting rokhs that is ur dum right... come up with arguments dude before you start to offend someone. unlimited cap =! unlimited tanking
Phoenus Caldari Reikoku KenZoku	Posted - 2009.02.08 18:39:00 - [8] Edited by: Phoenus on 08/02/2009 18:39:08 Originally by: Pipboy2K i still think this idea was somewhat stupid. sure, having no cap problems is nice... but that doenst mean you can permatank 2k+ dps on a shieldtanking ship. theres no crystal imps, no faction invus/deadspace hardeners/deadspace shield boosters and amplifiers in the turney... so you hardly reach the point where you can maybe permatank a gankmegathron (1.2k dps) but what when 3 abaddons fire at you? or even 10 navy caracals? melting rokhs that is I'm pretty sure that, had they not had a disconnect, -A- would have won that. To look at your 'checklist' above: Quote: that doenst mean you can permatank 2k+ dps on a shieldtanking ship Factually incorrect. * permatank a gankmegathron (1.2k dps) - tanks damage * permatank 2 gankmegathrons (2.4k dps) - tanks damage * permatank 3 gankmegathrons (3.6k dps) - tanks damage (with hardwirings / overheating) * 3 abaddons - tanks damage (highest shield resistance on those Rokh setups are Explosive, followed closely by EM) * 10 navy caracals - close, but doable with hardwirings/overheating) If you look at the Rokh/Vulture setups -A- fielded, those Rokh's had absolute monster tanks. Simply unlucky regarding the disconnect.
domadworkkid	Posted - 2009.02.08 18:41:00 - [9] Originally by: Phoenus Edited by: Phoenus on 08/02/2009 18:39:08 Originally by: Pipboy2K i still think this idea was somewhat stupid. sure, having no cap problems is nice... but that doenst mean you can permatank 2k+ dps on a shieldtanking ship. theres no crystal imps, no faction invus/deadspace hardeners/deadspace shield boosters and amplifiers in the turney... so you hardly reach the point where you can maybe permatank a gankmegathron (1.2k dps) but what when 3 abaddons fire at you? or even 10 navy caracals? melting rokhs that is I'm pretty sure that, had they not had a disconnect, -A- would have won that. To look at your 'checklist' above: Quote: that doenst mean you can permatank 2k+ dps on a shieldtanking ship Factually incorrect. * permatank a gankmegathron (1.2k dps) - tanks damage * permatank 2 gankmegathrons (2.4k dps) - tanks damage * permatank 3 gankmegathrons (3.6k dps) - tanks damage (with hardwirings / overheating) * 3 abaddons - tanks damage (highest shield resistance on those Rokh setups are Explosive, followed closely by EM) * 10 navy caracals - close, but doable with hardwirings/overheating) If you look at the Rokh/Vulture setups -A- fielded, those Rokh's had absolute monster tanks. Simply unlucky regarding the disconnect. thx 4 telling how dum he is 4 me.. i r the lazy
Pipboy2K Divine Retribution Sons of Tangra	Posted - 2009.02.08 19:16:00 - [10] Edited by: Pipboy2K on 08/02/2009 19:19:36 Originally by: Phoenus Edited by: Phoenus on 08/02/2009 18:57:34 Originally by: Pipboy2K i still think this idea was somewhat stupid. sure, having no cap problems is nice... but that doenst mean you can permatank 2k+ dps on a shieldtanking ship. theres no crystal imps, no faction invus/deadspace hardeners/deadspace shield boosters and amplifiers in the turney... so you hardly reach the point where you can maybe permatank a gankmegathron (1.2k dps) but what when 3 abaddons fire at you? or even 10 navy caracals? melting rokhs that is I'm pretty sure that, had they not had a disconnect, -A- would have won that. To look at your 'checklist' above: Quote: that doenst mean you can permatank 2k+ dps on a shieldtanking ship Factually incorrect. * permatank a gankmegathron (1.2k dps) - tanks damage * permatank 2 gankmegathrons (2.4k dps) - tanks damage * permatank 3 gankmegathrons (3.6k dps) - tanks damage (with hardwirings / overheating) * 3 abaddons - tanks damage (highest shield resistance on those Rokh setups are Explosive, followed closely by EM) * 10 navy caracals - close, but doable with hardwirings/overheating If you look at the Rokh/Vulture setups -A- fielded, those Rokh's had absolute monster tanks. Simply unlucky regarding the disconnect. unfortunatly i dont know what exactly they had fittet... the only way i know to really tank that amount would be to run dual x-large shield booster II and the rest of the medslots completly filled with tanking mods as well. but isnt that a bit dangerous to field something like this? this setups relies so heavy on the cap transfer then, that it means this setup is VERY vulnerable to jammers and cap warfare(which i wouldnt use in this turney), but considering how many kitsunes/other ecm ships people have fielded already this was a VERY dangerous setup to field. only way i could think of is that they knew what the others field War, war never changes

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.