Right because its impossiblefor players to organize coalitions with smaller groups. . . What are you like 12?
I know EvE. 21 years of age to join verified by submittion of valid picture id & thumb print login.

the greatest imbalance in eve are the alliances. simply put they have too much power. i base this conclusion on the actions of one particular alliance that has the ability to disrupt markets even in hi sec. ive come to the conclusion that alliances must go. that only corporations should be allowed to own claimable space and the number of claimable systems should be limited ie 5-10 systems at the most. by removing alliances from the scene you would open up all of null sec to the biggest land rush in eve history. corporations large and small would all have a chance at owning space. another aspect of this change it would intensify conflict, not reduce it, and that would be good news to all players who like the pvp aspect of eve. the more corps that you can have out in null sec increases the number of opportunities for conflict. one of the greatest reasons i propose this is to open up the mineral wealth of the moons to everyone, not just a select few with the most guns. i would propose with this change that if you dont own a system you cant mine the moons. all the mineral wealth in a system should rightfully belong to the corporations that claims it. this change in itself would go along way to correcting many of the imbalances in eve. these imbalances, mainly the concentration wealth in to few hands is ruining the game for everyone else. no alliance or corporation should be able to manipulate markets at the expense of all the other players. this very fact is one of the reasons why im leaving the game.

Honestly, you're right, but so is he in a way.

It's next to impossible to take arms against the biggest alliances and therefore not worth it.
But at the same time, practically everybody would like to have a piece of null and so the only way to do that, is to join one of these alliances.

If things continue like this, in 5 to 7 years, there will only be 2 or 3 alliances left, with perhaps a few very small ones controlling the space the other 3 deem uninteresting.

I don't know if that's such a good thing.

Honestly, you're right, but so is he in a way.

It's next to impossible to take arms against the biggest alliances and therefore not worth it.
But at the same time, practically everybody would like to have a piece of null and so the only way to do that, is to join one of these alliances.

If things continue like this, in 5 to 7 years, there will only be 2 or 3 alliances left, with perhaps a few very small ones controlling the space the other 3 deem uninteresting.

I don't know if that's such a good thing.

ive come to the conclusion that alliances must go

What are you like 12?

Before there was official support for alliances in EVE, people just handled them out of game and used their blue lists. CCP saw what the players were doing and added content for the sandbox.

If CCP was stupid enough listen to your suggestion and remove them from the game, we'd simply merge our corps into 1000+ man corps and still get our way. You and your pathetic 7 man corp would still be stuck in hisec carebearing it up.

Oh and there's nothing wrong with force-projection. You just suck at logistics.

When you say next to impossible you are 100% right. I think the 99% was an attempt at organizing against the powers that be. Don't hear much from them these days. Probably lack of interest, bought off or pets by now if I had to guess.

the greatest imbalance in eve are the alliances. simply put they have too much power. i base this conclusion on the actions of one particular alliance that has the ability to disrupt markets even in hi sec. ive come to the conclusion that alliances must go. that only corporations should be allowed to own claimable space and the number of claimable systems should be limited ie 5-10 systems at the most. by removing alliances from the scene you would open up all of null sec to the biggest land rush in eve history. corporations large and small would all have a chance at owning space. another aspect of this change it would intensify conflict, not reduce it, and that would be good news to all players who like the pvp aspect of eve. the more corps that you can have out in null sec increases the number of opportunities for conflict. one of the greatest reasons i propose this is to open up the mineral wealth of the moons to everyone, not just a select few with the most guns. i would propose with this change that if you dont own a system you cant mine the moons. all the mineral wealth in a system should rightfully belong to the corporations that claims it. this change in itself would go along way to correcting many of the imbalances in eve. these imbalances, mainly the concentration wealth in to few hands is ruining the game for everyone else. no alliance or corporation should be able to manipulate markets at the expense of all the other players. this very fact is one of the reasons why im leaving the game.

If you wish to force Alliances to concentrate in smaller area's, opening up more unclaimed null then...

1: The cost of upgrading your SOV was a good start, however the player base talked CCP into lowering the price. Owning Sov over more than a few systems needs to scale up quickly in cost.

Right because its impossiblefor players to organize coalitions with smaller groups. . . What are you like 12?
I know EvE. 21 years of age to join verified by submittion of valid picture id & thumb print login.

the greatest imbalance in eve are the alliances. simply put they have too much power. i base this conclusion on the actions of one particular alliance that has the ability to disrupt markets even in hi sec. ive come to the conclusion that alliances must go. that only corporations should be allowed to own claimable space and the number of claimable systems should be limited ie 5-10 systems at the most. by removing alliances from the scene you would open up all of null sec to the biggest land rush in eve history. corporations large and small would all have a chance at owning space. another aspect of this change it would intensify conflict, not reduce it, and that would be good news to all players who like the pvp aspect of eve. the more corps that you can have out in null sec increases the number of opportunities for conflict. one of the greatest reasons i propose this is to open up the mineral wealth of the moons to everyone, not just a select few with the most guns. i would propose with this change that if you dont own a system you cant mine the moons. all the mineral wealth in a system should rightfully belong to the corporations that claims it. this change in itself would go along way to correcting many of the imbalances in eve. these imbalances, mainly the concentration wealth in to few hands is ruining the game for everyone else. no alliance or corporation should be able to manipulate markets at the expense of all the other players. this very fact is one of the reasons why im leaving the game.

Heh. Just skip to the last four words....save yourselves the trouble of reading.

We would definitely have to break down the sov holding into many smaller "sov holding alliances", Goonswarm Federation1, Goonswarm Federation 2, etc etc. Holding alliances is definitely a novel concept though.

Managing all the tech moon POSes and jumpbridges would be definitely more annoying though..

I always thought they were a forums pvp group.

[stuff]