Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Lena Lazair
Sefrim
544
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 21:18:56 -
[61] - Quote
Sporx Utensil wrote:Colman Dietmar wrote:Why apply a restriction to a single ship class when you can just set the PG requirement to something like 100? That severely compromises fits for other ships. I'm glad they didn't do that; although fair enough if what they did pick is a bandaid.
Would have been more interesting to see them take the route of a fitted (offline too) entosis link "interferes" with interdiction nullification (magic hand-waving). You can still fit it to those ships, but you lose nullification if you do. Since that would apply to T3's as well. Also frees them up to continue to play around with nullification on other hulls in the future without having to agonize over entosis implications every time. |
peaSTAR
Low Risk
0
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 21:19:03 -
[62] - Quote
so with the jump timer changes 5 days of fatigue max. this means the uni has shrunk even more now.
does this mean fatigue timers will be adjusted ? (reduced) being as a quick response fleet will only be able to jump 3 times before hitting 1 days 7 hours 17 mins of fatigue,after that time it will be 7 days 19 hours 38 mins, unless your allowed to go over the 5 day max period this is not going to be of any use.
thanks for the stupidity ccp.sandbox game,becoming more like a matchbox game |
Evelgrivion
Calamitous-Intent Feign Disorder
352
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 21:21:39 -
[63] - Quote
peaSTAR wrote:so with the jump timer changes 5 days of fatigue max. this means the uni has shrunk even more now.
It was honestly starting to feel too big thanks to the jump fatigue changes. Dialing down the impacts of fatigue right now is, imo, a step in the right direction.
|
Ravcharas
Infinite Point DARKNESS.
428
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 21:24:02 -
[64] - Quote
Any ETA on capital rebalance? |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
1867
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 21:25:11 -
[65] - Quote
peaSTAR wrote:so with the jump timer changes 5 days of fatigue max. this means the uni has shrunk even more now.
does this mean fatigue timers will be adjusted ? (reduced) being as a quick response fleet will only be able to jump 3 times before hitting 1 days 7 hours 17 mins of fatigue,after that time it will be 7 days 19 hours 38 mins, unless your allowed to go over the 5 day max period this is not going to be of any use.
thanks for the stupidity ccp.sandbox game,becoming more like a matchbox game Considering that you can jump an unlimited number of times by waiting out 50 of the 60 minutes of fatigue a 5LY jump grants you, I fail to see the concern. A 5d fatigue, 5LY jump grants 1h12m of cooldown.
This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
|
Circumstantial Evidence
215
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 21:34:46 -
[66] - Quote
Ravcharas wrote:Any ETA on capital rebalance? This will be a main topic during the CSM summit, next week.
|
Cobat Marland
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 21:35:37 -
[67] - Quote
Good stuff guys |
Zappity
the 57th Overlanders Brigade A Band Apart.
2450
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 21:37:13 -
[68] - Quote
Good job. As a small gang player who has recently dabbled in taking sov I think you are going in the right direction with these changes and, more importantly, Aegis sov as a whole. It is a fundamentally good system and these are very good changes.
I would REALLY like to see killmails for sov structures so bounties can be placed on specific structures.
Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec.
|
DaReaper
Net 7
2560
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 21:39:09 -
[69] - Quote
Circumstantial Evidence wrote:Ravcharas wrote:Any ETA on capital rebalance? This will be a main topic during the CSM summit, next week.
most likley won;t hear anything till eve vegas is my guess, It would be wise to announce during the stream when lots of ex players might be watching
OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!
Yes i am optimistic about eve.. i'm giving it till dec 31st 2016 before i doom n gloom
|
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
2100
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 21:45:11 -
[70] - Quote
All Positive so far. Thanks for acting on this and iteration as you promised.
I can only say i hope the weekend CSM summit goes well and next week i get to mull over the proposed capital changes... Since its really hard to judge this new system without them being rebalanced.
There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people...
CCP Goliath wrote:
Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.
|
|
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
2100
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 21:47:25 -
[71] - Quote
Marcus Tedric wrote:I'm sad that the fitting restriction is to Interceptors only - it's too trite.
Much more sensible would be to restrict it to Destroyers, perhaps even Cruisers, and above - due to 'size' constraints.
I dunno I think from lore perspective this supposed to be some super advanced Jove module that can hack anything it would have to go on a ship that was designed for electronics warfare...
but apparently that goes against the stated design of atrons that can capture systems.
There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people...
CCP Goliath wrote:
Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.
|
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
2100
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 21:54:52 -
[72] - Quote
159Pinky wrote:So, now that all gates will be bubbled to **** to prevent entosis. When will you start add a limited timer for bubbles to be in space? SO ppl at least have to put an effort in to keeping their entrances bubbled
or maybe you should bring MJD ships.
There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people...
CCP Goliath wrote:
Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.
|
afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1976
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 21:59:25 -
[73] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:159Pinky wrote:So, now that all gates will be bubbled to **** to prevent entosis. When will you start add a limited timer for bubbles to be in space? SO ppl at least have to put an effort in to keeping their entrances bubbled The "timer" on a bubbled stargate already exists, and is directly linked to the DPS output of the ship you're trying to get through it.
That's garbage and you know it. |
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
23019
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:03:18 -
[74] - Quote
afkalt wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:159Pinky wrote:So, now that all gates will be bubbled to **** to prevent entosis. When will you start add a limited timer for bubbles to be in space? SO ppl at least have to put an effort in to keeping their entrances bubbled The "timer" on a bubbled stargate already exists, and is directly linked to the DPS output of the ship you're trying to get through it. That's garbage and you know it.
Last time I did that, a GM came by and took my nice things away.
Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
|
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
1869
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:03:20 -
[75] - Quote
afkalt wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:159Pinky wrote:So, now that all gates will be bubbled to **** to prevent entosis. When will you start add a limited timer for bubbles to be in space? SO ppl at least have to put an effort in to keeping their entrances bubbled The "timer" on a bubbled stargate already exists, and is directly linked to the DPS output of the ship you're trying to get through it. That's garbage and you know it.
Again, do they not have wormholes, cynos, and nullified strategic cruisers where you live?
This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
|
Max Kolonko
WATAHA. Unseen Wolves
546
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:09:55 -
[76] - Quote
I am Commander Shepard and I approve of this message
Read and support:
Don't mess with OUR WH's
What is Your stance on WH stuff?
|
Evelgrivion
Calamitous-Intent Feign Disorder
352
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:13:50 -
[77] - Quote
Querns wrote:Again, do they not have wormholes, cynos, and nullified strategic cruisers where you live?
Why would you use Tech 3s for Entosis? Any Entosis ship caught during the module cycle is basically doomed.
|
afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1977
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:14:02 -
[78] - Quote
Querns wrote:afkalt wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:159Pinky wrote:So, now that all gates will be bubbled to **** to prevent entosis. When will you start add a limited timer for bubbles to be in space? SO ppl at least have to put an effort in to keeping their entrances bubbled The "timer" on a bubbled stargate already exists, and is directly linked to the DPS output of the ship you're trying to get through it. That's garbage and you know it. Again, do they not have wormholes, cynos, and nullified strategic cruisers where you live?
Last I checked, WH can't be spawned on demand, cynos can be nullified and a clear and stated objective was to not limit the field to certain hulls.
This is why I was against the direct removal of intys but in favour of an increase in align time and a lower speed cap - these would allow active alliances to prosper but prevent passive defence.
Allowing an +effectively+ passive defence of sov is too much of a swing in the other direction. Do I need to live in my space? Hell no, I need only bubble the chokes to death, a wormholer can be ignored because that hole wont be there by the time the RF rolls around and now the nodes regenerate.
It is just too much in the wrong direction - close, but not there yet. |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
1873
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:16:02 -
[79] - Quote
Evelgrivion wrote:Querns wrote:Again, do they not have wormholes, cynos, and nullified strategic cruisers where you live? Why would you use Tech 3s for Entosis? Any Entosis ship caught during the module cycle is basically doomed. Alone, sure. You may need to bring a support fleet, or ante up to T2 entosis links to limit your exposure.
This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
|
Captain StringfellowHawk
Forsaken Reavers Goonswarm Federation
217
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:16:20 -
[80] - Quote
Reppyk wrote:Querns wrote:Reppyk wrote:We're now almost back to the "good era" of no-fatigue and sov-that-can-defend-itself. Well done CCP, one step forward, 2 steps back. Regeneration only occurs if no one bothers to show up for the timer. Have you considered committing to your attempts at sov conquest? Have you considered patrolling your own space ?
Have you considered Actually finishing something you started or is your group just not competent enough to hold it? |
|
Captain StringfellowHawk
Forsaken Reavers Goonswarm Federation
217
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:19:06 -
[81] - Quote
159Pinky wrote:So, now that all gates will be bubbled to **** to prevent entosis. When will you start add a limited timer for bubbles to be in space? SO ppl at least have to put an effort in to keeping their entrances bubbled
When they put a limit on cloaks so you have to at least put in an effort to be at the keyboard for your alts. |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
1874
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:20:02 -
[82] - Quote
afkalt wrote:Querns wrote:afkalt wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:159Pinky wrote:So, now that all gates will be bubbled to **** to prevent entosis. When will you start add a limited timer for bubbles to be in space? SO ppl at least have to put an effort in to keeping their entrances bubbled The "timer" on a bubbled stargate already exists, and is directly linked to the DPS output of the ship you're trying to get through it. That's garbage and you know it. Again, do they not have wormholes, cynos, and nullified strategic cruisers where you live? Last I checked, WH can't be spawned on demand, cynos can be nullified and a clear and stated objective was to not limit the field to certain hulls. This is why I was against the direct removal of intys but in favour of an increase in align time and a lower speed cap - these would allow active alliances to prosper but prevent passive defence. Allowing an +effectively+ passive defence of sov is too much of a swing in the other direction. Do I need to live in my space? Hell no, I need only bubble the chokes to death, a wormholer can be ignored because that hole wont be there by the time the RF rolls around and now the nodes regenerate. It is just too much in the wrong direction - close, but not there yet. Cynos can be nullified -- you can put a covert cyno on a covert, nullified strategic cruiser and sneak any number of people behind the dread bubble wall, then refit to a more combat-oriented configuration using mobile depots once you've arrived.
You can also shoot the bubbles. A large bubble costs 10m (20m for T2), so if you consistently blow them up, you can probably encourage the bubble havers to stop throwing money away. Anchored bubbles just aren't that big of a deal. Their defense of sovereignty is hardly meaningful at all -- at best, they slow down people hunting ratters. A sovereignty conquering force should have little issue destroying them.
This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
|
Evelgrivion
Calamitous-Intent Feign Disorder
352
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:20:59 -
[83] - Quote
Querns wrote:Evelgrivion wrote:Querns wrote:Again, do they not have wormholes, cynos, and nullified strategic cruisers where you live? Why would you use Tech 3s for Entosis? Any Entosis ship caught during the module cycle is basically doomed. Alone, sure. You may need to bring a support fleet, or ante up to T2 entosis links to limit your exposure.
This is a direction that is highly favorable to Goonswarm's established modus operendi; bring as big of a death ball as possible and take advantage of superior throw weight to ensure that each objective is achieved. If that's the direction Entosis is going to go, we might as well just throw the sov wands out completely and just go back to Dominion or POS Sov.
If someone doesn't have the CFC's mass, skirmish warfare is the only viable option. |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
1874
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:23:54 -
[84] - Quote
Evelgrivion wrote:Querns wrote:Evelgrivion wrote:Querns wrote:Again, do they not have wormholes, cynos, and nullified strategic cruisers where you live? Why would you use Tech 3s for Entosis? Any Entosis ship caught during the module cycle is basically doomed. Alone, sure. You may need to bring a support fleet, or ante up to T2 entosis links to limit your exposure. This is a direction that is highly favorable to Goonswarm's established modus operendi; bring as big of a death ball as possible and take advantage of superior throw weight to ensure that each objective is achieved. If that's the direction Entosis is going to go, we might as well just throw the sov wands out completely and just go back to Dominion or POS Sov. If someone doesn't have that kind of mass, skirmish warfare is their only viable option. It would be a tragedy for that option to be lost. I don't follow -- how does anything you talked about limit skirmish warfare?
This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
|
afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1977
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:25:19 -
[85] - Quote
Quote limit.
Querns wrote: Cynos can be nullified -- you can put a covert cyno on a covert, nullified strategic cruiser and sneak any number of people behind the dread bubble wall, then refit to a more combat-oriented configuration using mobile depots once you've arrived.
You can also shoot the bubbles. A large bubble costs 10m (20m for T2), so if you consistently blow them up, you can probably encourage the bubble havers to stop throwing money away. Anchored bubbles just aren't that big of a deal. Their defense of sovereignty is hardly meaningful at all -- at best, they slow down people hunting ratters. A sovereignty conquering force should have little issue destroying them.
It is still a hilarious design goal fail.
Tell me, if a minimum align time of 4s and a speed limit of 3k was enforced...what would the problem be?
You should not be able to hide behind anchorables so easily, it is every bit as big a flaw as the current model - except now it is in sov holders favour, so I guess that is ok.....? |
Urziel99
Multiplex Gaming The Bastion
125
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:25:33 -
[86] - Quote
Lena Lazair wrote: It's not the speed, size, or cost of inties that is the root problem; it's the bubble immunity. .
No, it is the unholy combination of all those attributes that make them the sov troll's wet dream. They needed to die before Aegis was released.
|
Commander Spurty
Dimension Door We need wards.
1562
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:33:50 -
[87] - Quote
I'm still a bit shocked that Entosis link isn't exactly like a Cyno, or at the very least a Siege module.
You light it and it:
A) puts up a beacon (like a cyno) B) you're sitting there for the duration.
A+B = both very recognizable mechanics already accepted in the game.
There are good ships
And wood ships
And ships that sail the sea
But the best ships are
Spaceships
Built by CCP
|
Spurty
Dimension Door We need wards.
1562
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:33:50 -
[88] - Quote
I'm still a bit shocked that Entosis link isn't exactly like a Cyno, or at the very least a Siege module.
You light it and it:
A) puts up a beacon (like a cyno) B) you're sitting there for the duration.
A+B = both very recognizable mechanics already accepted in the game.
There are good ships
And wood ships
And ships that sail the sea
But the best ships are
Spaceships
Built by CCP
|
Captain StringfellowHawk
Forsaken Reavers Goonswarm Federation
219
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:34:59 -
[89] - Quote
afkalt wrote:Querns wrote:afkalt wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:159Pinky wrote:So, now that all gates will be bubbled to **** to prevent entosis. When will you start add a limited timer for bubbles to be in space? SO ppl at least have to put an effort in to keeping their entrances bubbled The "timer" on a bubbled stargate already exists, and is directly linked to the DPS output of the ship you're trying to get through it. That's garbage and you know it. Again, do they not have wormholes, cynos, and nullified strategic cruisers where you live? Last I checked, WH can't be spawned on demand, cynos can be nullified and a clear and stated objective was to not limit the field to certain hulls. This is why I was against the direct removal of intys but in favour of an increase in align time and a lower speed cap - these would allow active alliances to prosper but prevent passive defence. Allowing an +effectively+ passive defence of sov is too much of a swing in the other direction. Do I need to live in my space? Hell no, I need only bubble the chokes to death, a wormholer can be ignored because that hole wont be there by the time the RF rolls around and now the nodes regenerate. It is just too much in the wrong direction - close, but not there yet.
You realize if you come across a gate bubbled like that.. all you do is wave the magic ticket wand at a GM.. and those players who dropped all those Bubbles will feel very sorry. while you can Bubble a gate.. only X amount of bubbles may be used. Any amount of Cans/bubbles around gates that start to effect the loading of someones computers is considered bannable and an exploit. CCP has swung that magic hammer many times on players, suspending them and banning them for multiple offences.
|
Reppyk
The Black Shell
805
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:36:43 -
[90] - Quote
Captain StringfellowHawk wrote:Have you considered Actually finishing something you started or is your group just not competent enough to hold it? Have you considered that many people are interested in the fight and not in the sov/ihubs/whatever ? Have you considered that, since the nodes will regen, a lot less fights can be expected ? Have you considered that, since the anom buff, you can park 600 pilots in the same constellation and they all have something to grind, making our current universe way too big for the low population in 00 ? Have you considered that the game does not need a better, juicer carrot, but on the contrary a lower density of the riches, that would create conflicts after ~4 years of relative peace ?
I AM SPACE CAPTAIN REPPYK. BEWARE.
Proud co-admin of frugu.net, a French fansite about EVE !
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |