| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. Sticky:Combat frigate changes for Inferno - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Veshta Yoshida wrote: Why are people fuming at getting a Caldari gun frigate that seems to be able to slug it out with the best of them? Until it is known what is planned for the awesome (yes, awesome .. rock Kestrel pwns!) Kestrel and the res...
- by ACE81 - at 2012.05.21 21:33:00
|
2. ECM fix Idea - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Well in a way it would fix the ECM drones as well as they would only be able to break the current targets locks with no timer penalty's the defender could have time to shoot the drones down if he had a sensor booster to allow quick locks(would mak...
- by ACE81 - at 2012.05.21 09:03:00
|
3. ECM fix Idea - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Surprised this didn't get a discussion going? Guess people like being stunned for 20 seconds at a time.
- by ACE81 - at 2012.05.21 03:16:00
|
4. ECM fix Idea - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
No Ewar is not broken just in some situations it comes across as OP. Thank you for not wanting perform painful surgery on me. And falcons would still be very useful especially against anything with a low scan resolution. could potentially still ...
- by ACE81 - at 2012.05.17 11:08:00
|
5. ECM fix Idea - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Made this comment in Ships and mods and seems to have gotten a few likes for it so I will repost it here for discussion and perhaps Dev attention perhaps not but you never know. ] ACE81 wrote: Hmm Ewar could be made more fun if it only broke lo...
- by ACE81 - at 2012.05.17 10:29:00
|
6. Sticky:Combat frigate changes for Inferno - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Role names I would use. Direct combat - Emphasis on versatility Long Range Combat - Emphasis on range Tackler\interceptor - Emphasis on speed Logistic support - Emphasis on fleet support Electronic Warfare - Emphasis on EW Intel\prober - Emphasi...
- by ACE81 - at 2012.05.14 11:52:00
|
7. Armor Plates - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Well if they were welded on then they would not be removeable with out risk of damaging the ship. just my two cents "I want a Secure can thats as big as my Jet can for solo mining :P 27k m3"
- by ACE81 - at 2010.12.29 03:15:00
|
8. Armor Plates - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: ACE81 on 29/12/2010 02:25:53 Megnetic couplers hold the plates down and require a large amout of power\cpu to make sure they dont decouple during combat. Or they Weigh so much that the added mass requires more power\cpu to make ...
- by ACE81 - at 2010.12.29 02:22:00
|
9. Delete long-time inactive characters - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ummm how about no as I have taken 2 years off from this game due to RL issues and would hate to come back and see my charater deleted because I had some RL issues to deal with. If its a trial account thats never paid a dollar to subscribe then sur...
- by ACE81 - at 2010.12.24 12:19:00
|
10. more radical thinking - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: ryan2sdsdsadsad -Remove warp scram/distruptors for everyone except interdictors and heavy interdictor bubbles (make the bubbles fleet friendly though) every noob and his dog warp scrams and no one uses interdictors, so now s...
- by ACE81 - at 2010.12.24 07:15:00
|
11. Destroyers and the badly needed overhaul - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sir Drake The glass-cannon approche on them is fine and it should die to anything cruiser sized or bigger (therfore sig is fine) but on the same take it should be able to kill any of the fast frigs, eg. Dramiels/Daredevils/c...
- by ACE81 - at 2010.12.23 09:21:00
|
12. Destroyers and the badly needed overhaul - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Destroyers need a sig rad reduction and 2 of them need there slots adjusted ( +1 low -1 mid on cormi +1 mids -1 low on corcer) remove the -25%rof penaty and with these little changes the dessy would be much better but still not op ship IMO "I want...
- by ACE81 - at 2010.12.23 07:09:00
|
13. something different- Scud Launcher - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sounds more like space artilary not a bad idea, altho perhaps steath bombers alredy fill this role persay? "I want a Secure can thats as big as my Jet can for solo mining :P 27k m3"
- by ACE81 - at 2010.02.10 18:55:00
|
14. Moving away from raw damage... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
One other Thing I use the faster 75mm over the 150mm anyday as in my opinion ROF is always better then raw fire power!
- by ACE81 - at 2010.01.29 15:02:00
|
15. Moving away from raw damage... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This is the best thing out of this Idea I like the rest I could do with out :) Target signature : I seen this in an earlier thread a while ago, why not make the target signature get smaller the more weapons are attacking it? This mean pourring m...
- by ACE81 - at 2010.01.28 20:12:00
|
16. Another T2 Destroyer - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Thank you and good points on why not.
- by ACE81 - at 2010.01.28 19:52:00
|
17. Another T2 Destroyer - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Khandahar Bob Maybe they could put it into a cruiser-sized hull and call it a Recon; what do you think? Originally by: XIII'th skill recons What you got an Idea or just saying we dont need this?
- by ACE81 - at 2010.01.28 15:45:00
|
18. HTML 5 support for EVE's ingame browser? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Indeed would be nice
- by ACE81 - at 2010.01.28 14:17:00
|
19. Idea to try revive the mining career - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I want a Secure can thats as big as my Jet can for solo mining :P 27k m3
- by ACE81 - at 2010.01.28 14:09:00
|
20. Another T2 Destroyer - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Well I for one like diversity and feel this is a good Idea and natural progression of the Black ops line of ships
- by ACE81 - at 2010.01.28 13:51:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |