| Pages: [1] |
1. Insurance B0rked? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Bhal'rog on 02/07/2004 11:42:03 I understand why the insurance doesn't cover the cost of the ship. CCP has to walk a fine line. If they make the insurance payout to high it becomes exploitable. I am fine with that. I paid 600K for ...
- by Bhal'rog - at 2004.07.02 11:40:00
|
2. Insurance B0rked? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Bhal'rog on 02/07/2004 11:42:03 I understand why the insurance doesn't cover the cost of the ship. CCP has to walk a fine line. If they make the insurance payout to high it becomes exploitable. I am fine with that. I paid 600K for ...
- by Bhal'rog - at 2004.07.02 11:40:00
|
3. Insurance B0rked? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Insurance on my Stiletto cost me around 600k for a 2 million payout (approx.) Long story short, ship goes boom, and I only collect 200,000 isk (approx.) I purchased a new Stiletto and Platinum insurance now only cost 80,000 isk (approx.) for a...
- by Bhal'rog - at 2004.07.01 23:12:00
|
4. Insurance B0rked? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Insurance on my Stiletto cost me around 600k for a 2 million payout (approx.) Long story short, ship goes boom, and I only collect 200,000 isk (approx.) I purchased a new Stiletto and Platinum insurance now only cost 80,000 isk (approx.) for a...
- by Bhal'rog - at 2004.07.01 23:12:00
|
5. Bug Thread, 1413++ - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Infiltrator Medium Drone has wrong icon - appears as a Hammerhead Ship Scanner not giving reliable results when flagging pilots (not a result of rounding) - showing positive sec. status pilots as negative (intermitant problem) - showing some pi...
- by Bhal'rog - at 2004.04.02 19:05:00
|
6. Ship Scanner still FUBAR - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Indicator light wrongly identifying positve sec. status pilots as negative sec. (not a rounding issue. A corpmate with a positve 5 security rating should not be identified as a pilot with a negative security status.) Indicator light wrongly ident...
- by Bhal'rog - at 2004.03.26 16:09:00
|
7. Mission enclosed should be scaled back - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Quote: [that's the only 2 bonuses (other than small isk) that I have recieved since this weeks patch. 2 Implants can make up for a lot. I've been getting tech 2 stuff and decent isk from my Republic Fleet Agent for bonus. No implants y...
- by Bhal'rog - at 2004.01.30 17:20:00
|
8. It's unfair - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Quote: You forgot the third kind. Thast are sittng on there stuff waiting fr the market to change. As I read in onther thread these goods are likely to rise beyond what the value was for refining making those that refined wish they hadnt. ...
- by Bhal'rog - at 2004.01.30 15:13:00
|
9. It's unfair - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Quote: Anyone who bought T2 components off the market, pls raise your hand. If not STFU. Whining carebears....jeez. How did u lose anything, u lost only potential earnings, your fault for sitting on the things. Raises hand. How could I ...
- by Bhal'rog - at 2004.01.29 19:32:00
|
10. Changes to reprocessing and refining - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Bhal'rog on 16/12/2003 14:29:53 I also think the new skills are designed to limit stip mining by all the Joe Schmoos in battleships. Now peeps have to be more selective in the ore they mine. It should leave plenty of the lesser ores...
- by Bhal'rog - at 2003.12.16 14:28:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |