Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Carrier ratting! - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Raimy Ikkala wrote: Ive been simulating between armor tanked thanny and shield tank chimera. Both being either double or triple repped with ok tank. Well guess only time will tell Jesus, don't put reppers on a ratting carrier. (one armor rep...
- by C-137 - at 2017.03.22 15:21:15
|
2. pyfa 1.18.1 (YC 118.1 release) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Command Boosts (Info - Electronic Superiority to be specific) have stopped working correctly in the past few days. Upgrading from 1.28.0 to 1.28.1 did not help. Reinstalling did not help. Deleting the fitting database did not help. http://i.im...
- by C-137 - at 2017.03.22 14:56:17
|
3. EFT v2.13.4 - Incursion 1.4.1 - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
EFT and PYFA are calculating applied dps wrong. This is for gun based damage only. I have explained the situation in the pfya thread
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.27 08:02:44
|
4. pyfa 1.18.1 (YC 118.1 release) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
So a few days ago I noticed that EFT seemed to be showing wrong numbers for applied DPS. At least according to the EVEuni wiki info, which CCP has quoted as correct recently. So I made a quick spreadsheet to test damage application, and EFT was o...
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.27 07:01:51
|
5. EFT v2.13.4 - Incursion 1.4.1 - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Spiritsun Russia wrote: wtf? why there is a dependency Defence and Large Shield Extender? look down 242.9 + 68.6 = 311.5
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.27 04:30:21
|
6. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: So what DPS should a max DPS, Omni fit carrier do to a lone, under tanked, reasonably high sig, slow cruiser? Sorry but; Your Onyx IS NOT SPEED TANKED - It was sig tanked, Sort of. You have at least one extender on it. I take...
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.27 03:18:01
|
7. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Morgaine Mighthammer wrote: C-137 wrote: Morgaine Mighthammer wrote: C-137 wrote: You seriously want a PVE carrier to do more than 600 dps to a speed tanked cruiser? wow I don't even... yes, a carrier setup for ratting, eg hitting e...
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.26 16:01:02
|
8. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Morgaine Mighthammer wrote: C-137 wrote: You seriously want a PVE carrier to do more than 600 dps to a speed tanked cruiser? wow I don't even... yes, a carrier setup for ratting, eg hitting everything from battleships through frigates, sh...
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.26 15:52:37
|
9. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Marranar Amatin wrote: Btw. here are some other dps numbers to compare against that Onyx (assuming a perfect transversal speed for the Onyx), for other ship classes (all ships get 3 damage mods and 2 application mods): Ph+Šnix: ~650 Nagl: 800 ...
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.26 15:51:35
|
10. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: Can you post the fit you were using because for a speed tanked cruiser it is pretty slow and has a pretty big sig and very very low EHP for any other use. Was the cruiser orbiting the carrier (it wouldn't be doing 900m/s) or w...
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.26 15:26:22
|
11. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Morrigan LeSante wrote: You realise the problem is many are unhappy at the fleet level where such a fit will never exist. At the same time small gangs can still be dunked by a handful of **** fit carriers. Hence my position that these changes d...
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.26 12:51:09
|
12. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Evelgrivion wrote: C-137 wrote: Cade Windstalker wrote: Given the current state of the changes I wouldn't worry about Light Fighters being a solo I-Win button. If you get nuked by a single carrier's fighters, in a decently tanked Cruiser,...
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.26 06:38:34
|
13. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Given the current state of the changes I wouldn't worry about Light Fighters being a solo I-Win button. If you get nuked by a single carrier's fighters, in a decently tanked Cruiser, it will be because you've been webbed...
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.25 03:24:56
|
14. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Morrigan LeSante wrote: C-137 wrote: Morrigan LeSante wrote: I told you, two omnis. Add range scripts. Profit. And it is not a problem, it's how you kill interceptors. 1 OTE and 1 DNC would be better, but whatever. No, it wouldn't...
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.24 09:24:22
|
15. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Morrigan LeSante wrote: I told you, two omnis. Add range scripts. Profit. And it is not a problem, it's how you kill interceptors. 1 OTE and 1 DNC would be better, but whatever.
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.24 08:55:23
|
16. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Morrigan LeSante wrote: 0) I'll await Vania confirming, he was surprised too. I don't have captures on this machine (I'm at work), it was late and I was in a rush. 1) Yes, you can. It's trivial. Maybe not that far passed, but you can do wit wi...
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.24 08:49:28
|
17. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Morrigan LeSante wrote: C-137 wrote: So Crazy Vania and I tested some fits. I can't really give any specific logs because I didn't mark down what was what, and we tried a few things. The take aways: 3xDDA is the minimum to force an Inty off...
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.24 08:20:52
|
18. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Carriers aren't completely helpless against an Inty, and an Inty can't perma-tackle a Carrier with a decently balanced Fighter loadout. A Carrier can't blap an Inty without so much support as to make the exercise...
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.24 00:23:34
|
19. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
So Crazy Vania and I tested some fits. I can't really give any specific logs because I didn't mark down what was what, and we tried a few things. The take aways: 3xDDA is the minimum to force an Inty off-grid. Tracking Links and Tracking Enhancer...
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.23 22:46:14
|
20. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Morrigan LeSante wrote: The chap you're arguing/debating with is scramming the dromis. You seem not to be? This will make a huge difference if that is the case. I cannot target them fast enough on my 2nd account to scram them before they ...
- by C-137 - at 2016.06.23 18:28:52
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |