| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] |
181. The sad truth as I see it.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
hmmm... disregard... Seems like I'm gettin double posts that aren't even the same
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.08 23:34:00
|
182. Going to iceland - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bribe Hilmar with some pickled herring to dump NEX shop work and work on spaceship content.
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.08 22:46:00
|
183. Since when....V2.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I believe earlier someone in the thread below was saying that unlike on SWG forums, at least people here weren't being gagged / censored / banned for their opinions. (read through it. it's in there somewhere). https://forums.eveonline.com/defaul...
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.08 19:44:00
|
184. The Mittani Declares War - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Seleene wrote: Hey, you leave the U.S. Congress out of this!! WIN!
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.08 19:17:00
|
185. An acceptable F2P model for EVE? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
While in theory it sounds good, I don't think this is a good idea. I'm not even a spy / scammer / griefer / thief, and I can already think of many ways I could abuse that proposed system for those purposes. I can't even imagine what underhanded pl...
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.08 18:50:00
|
186. SWG NGE similarities - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Skex Relbore wrote: Stuff.... Bravo. Give this man a cookie. He's wrapped it up quite nicely and realistically. That's exactly what's happening. He just expressed it more eloquently than I could. baltec1 wrote: CSM have any power at ...
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.08 16:46:00
|
187. SWG NGE similarities - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Myxx wrote: [quote=baltec1]ONCE AGAIN: It isnt in the game details. Its in how its being handled by CCP and the playerbase's reaction. Correct. This seems to be what people are missing the point on. Screw the game mechanics or how similar or...
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.08 16:09:00
|
188. The Mittani Declares War - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xercodo wrote: I think what caused CCP to shoot themselves in the collective foot was their vow to themselves to always do two expansions a year. But CCP has grown and it is no longer as nimble, . I think this treads somewhat in the right di...
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.08 15:53:00
|
189. CCP - your saviour has arrived! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hopefully you're not planning on using this toon for a supermodel. She looks like she fell out of the ugly tree and hit every branch with her face on the way down.
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.08 15:03:00
|
190. introducing the new eagle 2012 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I really hope hybrids get the loving they deserve. Right now, they're pretty much useless which basically renders most Gallente ships and a fair number of Caldari ships useless. There's a reason that you only see Minmatar and Amarr ships being use...
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.08 04:02:00
|
191. Linking forum threads in-game - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tiven loves Tansien wrote: Have trust and confidence in CCP. They will fix it. looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool SoonGäó
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.08 03:17:00
|
192. EVE Gate Mail > Ingame Mail? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
But my fukung urls are always awesome!
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.08 03:15:00
|
193. EVE Gate Mail > Ingame Mail? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I just wish you could add URLs, tag items, players, etc like you can in game. Otherwise though, I like the fact I can access my mail from work and such. This is at least 1 part of Evegate that I find useful. Otherwise, it's a poor attempt at Evebook.
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.08 03:11:00
|
194. CCP, any updates on the hangar with ship spinning ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cyzlaki wrote: Ship spinning is old, antiquated, useless and has been replaced with the more much useful Captain's Quarters. Good riddance to ship spinning. All they need to do is performance optimization on the CQ. It's not about the ship ...
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.08 02:07:00
|
195. Rate the Avatar above you - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
nvm... too many posted between. lol
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.08 02:01:00
|
196. "We listen very closely to what the players ask for and are..." - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Whether it's competition or not for Eve is irrelevant. The message that they put out about "listening to what their customers want" is something that any company shoudl aspire to. And CCP should take note of that.
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.08 00:00:00
|
197. CCP, any updates on the hangar with ship spinning ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Demica Diaz wrote: I would like to suggest to Devs that pilot when docking to station have option to leave pod, if he or she choses so, CQ will load. If pilot choses to stay in ship because he will be undocking soon we get Hangar view like it w...
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.07 23:04:00
|
198. CCP, any updates on the hangar with ship spinning ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tethys Atreides wrote: Crunch, The answer for this is to make one certain function only available from inside the station. Hell, it could be clone upgrades. As long as you force a walk for something you accomplish the marketing goal. People ar...
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.07 19:54:00
|
199. CCP, any updates on the hangar with ship spinning ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
We're not likely to see ship spinning now or ever. The simple option of keeping the hangar and giving us a "leave ship" button would be an easy thing to implement, but it won't be. Truth is, marketing and management won't allow it. Without seein...
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.07 19:30:00
|
200. Seeing lot's of Dev activity here any chance we could get - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well, it seems that this thread has now gone silent from the CCP side now that it's been injected with a bit of common sense from the community. Can't say I'm surprised. It's the status quo.
- by Crunchmeister - at 2011.09.07 18:27:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |