Please keep in mind that I'm a Database Developer not a Project Manager. But I did go around and poke some people who wield more power than just telling people off because their queries aren't seekable.

Essentially what this all boils down to is: "You will get ship-spinning back. It's only a question of fitting it into our plans.".
I know, I didn't tell you anything new.

But believe me, the people I spoke to seemed to understand the priority of this. They themselves will give you more concrete information as soon as they can, we all understand that the answer I just gave you isn't satisfactory, but it is the best I can give you.

The reason for this being the best I can provide is that we are currently in the middle of a planning phase. Everything is up in the air and mutable at this point so promises aren't a current possibility. All I can really do is assure you that we're not ignoring the issue nor do we intend to bury it and hopefully the final plans will start to emerge soon and we can actually give you some insight into them.

But that's me with my tinfoil, i'm sure there will be plenty of people that will tell you why there is no need for an option to CQ, and why you should have to load your avatar every time you dock for ammo.....

and this environment will be available until Incarna performance is similar to pre-Incarna performance.

They also said:


So if they get performance back before they release the new environment, then they would never need to release it.

Well the statement starts with "environment will be available" and at the moment it is not, so the later part of the statement does not apply. For a feature to be available "until" something happens, that feature has to exist first.

If you think about it for a second you will realize that the following statements are not equivalent:

"It will be available until condition x"

"It will be available unless condition x"

If you have trouble understanding the difference between those two sentences then I really have no interest in this discussion.

CCP said that the new environment will be released and I have no reason not to believe them (lol), so what's the ETA ?

have no problem understanding the difference at all.

If you think about it for a second you will realize that the following statements are not equivalent:

"It will be available until condition x"

"It will be available unless condition x"

If you have trouble understanding the difference between those two sentences then I really have no interest in this discussion.

CCP said that the new environment will be released and I have no reason not to believe them (lol), so what's the ETA ?

It's not like CCP have ever mislead us before

In the past they used to communicate with the players a lot, now the chances of CCP actually answering the simple question asked in this thread are next to zero.

Seeing as I've been trying to pull my pants up lately,

Also Sentinella poked me

But I did go around and poke some people

Right!

Essentially what this all boils down to is: "You will get ship-spinning back. It's only a question of fitting it into our plans.".
I know, I didn't tell you anything new.

Also Sentinella poked me through EVE Mail... ok it was mostly that

Please keep in mind that I'm a Database Developer not a Project Manager. But I did go around and poke some people who wield more power than just telling people off because their queries aren't seekable.

Essentially what this all boils down to is: "You will get ship-spinning back. It's only a question of fitting it into our plans.".
I know, I didn't tell you anything new.

But believe me, the people I spoke to seemed to understand the priority of this. They themselves will give you more concrete information as soon as they can, we all understand that the answer I just gave you isn't satisfactory, but it is the best I can give you.

And thanks a lot for taking the time to answer this, it wasn't that difficult wasn't it ?

It's better than nothing, at least it's still planned even if there is no ETA.

It practically is nothing. Though I do respect Prism and Soundwave(he posted on old forums) for actually responding instead of ignoring like usual.

See CCP is learning.

Right!

Seeing as I've been trying to pull my pants up lately, and start being active on the forums again, I might as well try and be useful as well rather than just attempting to be funny (Also Sentinella poked me through EVE Mail... ok it was mostly that ). Please keep in mind that I'm a Database Developer not a Project Manager. But I did go around and poke some people who wield more power than just telling people off because their queries aren't seekable.

Essentially what this all boils down to is: "You will get ship-spinning back. It's only a question of fitting it into our plans.".
I know, I didn't tell you anything new.

But believe me, the people I spoke to seemed to understand the priority of this. They themselves will give you more concrete information as soon as they can, we all understand that the answer I just gave you isn't satisfactory, but it is the best I can give you.

The reason for this being the best I can provide is that we are currently in the middle of a planning phase. Everything is up in the air and mutable at this point so promises aren't a current possibility. All I can really do is assure you that we're not ignoring the issue nor do we intend to bury it and hopefully the final plans will start to emerge soon and we can actually give you some insight into them.

Also, I'm selling T2 Rock blueprints over in Ami. They're great for throwing back at me!

P.S. Ignore my signature in this case. I'm actually trying to be helpful and informative.

Right!

Seeing as I've been trying to pull my pants up lately, and start being active on the forums again, I might as well try and be useful as well rather than just attempting to be funny (Also Sentinella poked me through EVE Mail... ok it was mostly that ). Please keep in mind that I'm a Database Developer not a Project Manager. But I did go around and poke some people who wield more power than just telling people off because their queries aren't seekable.

Essentially what this all boils down to is: "You will get ship-spinning back. It's only a question of fitting it into our plans.".
I know, I didn't tell you anything new.

But believe me, the people I spoke to seemed to understand the priority of this. They themselves will give you more concrete information as soon as they can, we all understand that the answer I just gave you isn't satisfactory, but it is the best I can give you.

The reason for this being the best I can provide is that we are currently in the middle of a planning phase. Everything is up in the air and mutable at this point so promises aren't a current possibility. All I can really do is assure you that we're not ignoring the issue nor do we intend to bury it and hopefully the final plans will start to emerge soon and we can actually give you some insight into them.

Also, I'm selling T2 Rock blueprints over in Ami. They're great for throwing back at me!

P.S. Ignore my signature in this case. I'm actually trying to be helpful and informative.

Prisim X,

I'm a very optimistic person, I rarely say "bad things", however I can say with ease that the frustrations of the pilots are not being met and there's about to be another uproar if things like the hangar view with all of it's functionality isn't implemented with haste.

I want to make VERY clear that "ship spinning" is a term used to sum up that people want the functionality of the old hangar, NOT just the nostalgic spinning of the ship.

You've forced us to looking at a door. The game doesn't work if you have multiple clients unless your computer is the latest and greatest tech on the market.

You'll hear frequently "I've got 3 clients running great with max rez etc..." These people have over 1k of graphics cards in their computer.

The average player's computers are cooking. I've got a 295 GTX that literally cooks eggs now. No lie, the temp is high enough to boil an egg. This temp is not reached in any other game. The latest Crisis engine does not strain my computer nearly as much as CQ does.

This needs to be fixed, FAST. The attitude from CCP that "we'll get to it" will quickly tick people off who don't have $1k in graphics cards in their computer and want functionality back.