| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
1. New boosters? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Dear CCP, will the new boosters make in to new expansion at 21 of june? ===== * Your signature file is broken. Please use one that will display - Fallout
- by Cyberus - at 2011.06.07 15:01:00
|
2. Defencive amplification node on tengu - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
So no 1 has noticed that yet? ===== * Your signature file is broken. Please use one that will display - Fallout
- by Cyberus - at 2011.06.05 20:37:00
|
3. Its just looks so wrong. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Ayieka meh, take the bad with the good. better than seeing a giant low-texture version of your mach. TBH i would preffer size over low texture, simply because it will impress me more. ( like: WTF .... this ship is huge. ...
- by Cyberus - at 2011.06.05 20:35:00
|
4. Its just looks so wrong. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I know that CCP can care less about this but its looks so unrealistic. Its looks more like max size of 2 trucks instead of 1 km long ship. http://imageshack.us/f/546/20110602222312.jpg/ Its must look more like this: http://www.youtube.com/wa...
- by Cyberus - at 2011.06.05 15:27:00
|
5. Defencive amplification node on tengu - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
DO anyone else have same issue before i sent bug report? This node do not apply bonuses anymore to shield booster. Anyone? ===== * Your signature file is broken. Please use one that will display - Fallout
- by Cyberus - at 2011.06.04 13:25:00
|
6. My Tengu is flying backwards. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
confirming its fly backwards ===== * Your signature file is broken. Please use one that will display - Fallout
- by Cyberus - at 2011.06.04 13:08:00
|
7. Issues remain with cosmic anamolies not despawning properly - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Cyberus on 14/12/2009 10:16:42 Originally by: Moon Kitten Edited by: Moon Kitten on 13/12/2009 17:02:24 Originally by: Sindek Yarivov Recap, this is a bug that did not raise its head on Sisi. It appeared when th...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.12.14 10:15:00
|
8. Issues remain with cosmic anamolies not despawning properly - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: ShadowandLight Ill 100% throw my support behind this. Having WORKING combat sites in 0.0 was a dire upgrade with Dominion, and then it gets launched and its broken. Frankly its kill the ISK potential of the area. Tbh it...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.12.11 13:49:00
|
9. Issues remain with cosmic anamolies not despawning properly - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
its seems SANCTUM anomalies still f..ked. ===== * Your signature file is broken. Please use one that will display - Fallout
- by Cyberus - at 2009.12.09 19:05:00
|
10. Issues remain with cosmic anamolies not despawning properly - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Cyberus on 07/12/2009 15:38:51 Edited by: Cyberus on 07/12/2009 15:36:48 Bug report id: 89191 TQ relaited I have write down complete step by step report with trying anything to find an triger so anomaly do despawn. But i fail s...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.12.07 15:36:00
|
11. Dumbing down eve yet again. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP fails once again. Tbh i just will concider next time if it worth totrain some skills to lvl5 to get some new toy/professoin. think it will be simply to just wait up for the next expansion and get that for less skill training. This game becom...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.10.19 09:12:00
|
12. Dominion Titan Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
After reading what titans will be capable to do in Dominion i belave that CCP finenly did find way around how to reduce the numbers of titans in game and aliances . All this will probebly lead that more titan will be fieldet in mixed battles ( ca...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.09.30 16:39:00
|
13. Fleet bonus - Armor buff vs shield buff - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
+1 this did bother me every time. ===== * Your signature file is broken. Please use one that will display - Fallout
- by Cyberus - at 2009.05.01 18:38:00
|
14. How should ECM work? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Murina Originally by: Cyberus Meaby yes or meaby not. If you read ( and apologies for my bad english) i have already said that one of the primery counters vs. Ecm will be ECCM since it is will provide 100% sucess ...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.04.28 19:08:00
|
15. How should ECM work? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Murina Originally by: Cyberus 1st of what i think is by redusing range of ECM dramatecly so it will be not common module on every ship in game. I understand what you are trying to do but all reducing range on e...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.04.28 18:29:00
|
16. How should ECM work? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Murina Originally by: Cyberus I beleave you did understand it wrong. 100% chance will be only on the 1st module. What is to stop every ship in a gang with a free or available mid slot from fitting a single m...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.04.28 18:00:00
|
17. How should ECM work? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Jack Icegaard Originally by: Cyberus My 2 cents. 1) Remove all racial jammers 2) Boost multiespectrals strength and make it 100% chance as other El. warfare ( webs, damps, etc) 3) Add staking penaltys on them. ( so ...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.04.28 17:42:00
|
18. ECM Ship II - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
My 2 cents. 1) Remove all racial jammers 2) Boost multiespectrals strength and make it 100% chance as other El. warfare ( webs, damps, etc) 3) Add staking penaltys on them. ( so pilots dont fit more as 2.. max 3) to sucessfully count with eccm fi...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.04.28 17:12:00
|
19. How should ECM work? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
My 2 cents. 1) Remove all racial jammers 2) Boost multiespectrals strength and make it 100% chance as other El. warfare ( webs, damps, etc) 3) Add staking penaltys on them. ( so pilots dont fit more as 2.. max 3) to sucessfully count with eccm fi...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.04.28 17:10:00
|
20. To all the "nerf local" posters: - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Realy look forward if CCP will implement this.. and yes i like the idea. But i will mostly not enjoy because of so clever idea but about all this most posters above who will start whine like babys again of forums that this new stuff did ruin they ...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.04.15 18:30:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |