| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
161. Give my portret back. - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Edited by: Cyberus on 10/10/2009 21:01:24 Well not sure if it rigth place to ask it but i could not find better place to do so i post here. CCP plz give my portret back on this character this galente ugly face make me sick when i look at. GI...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.10.10 21:00:00
|
162. Eve Fitting Tool - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
is it bug or? I found some difrence between EFT ( last version) and fitting window in game ( while in space and mods active) there is 2 difrences i have found and that is effective hp EFT: shows me 120 413 EVE: 103 866 ------------ Cap stabi...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.09.30 17:52:00
|
163. Dominion Titan Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
After reading what titans will be capable to do in Dominion i belave that CCP finenly did find way around how to reduce the numbers of titans in game and aliances . All this will probebly lead that more titan will be fieldet in mixed battles ( ca...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.09.30 16:39:00
|
164. WTB 2x60 d codes for 530 each - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
One for CYBERUS One for MILD SPIKE ===== * Your signature file is broken. Please use one that will display - Fallout
- by Cyberus - at 2009.09.27 11:34:00
|
165. [WTS] 3 x 60 Day Code - Secure - 570m - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
is it offer still open? ===== * Your signature file is broken. Please use one that will display - Fallout
- by Cyberus - at 2009.09.27 11:23:00
|
166. ECM by ship class - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto No, we already have sensor strength to enforce a similar mechanic, and this is an absurd and unnecessary mechanic. Not supported. And that is exactly the problem since sensor strength of battleship hull...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.05.25 21:01:00
|
167. ECM by ship class - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Personaly i beleave that ECM how it is now ( even after the change) are still most powerfull module in the game and must be complitely revisited. But i will leave hereby without any more propose to change it in any way... since there have been ple...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.05.25 18:13:00
|
168. ECM by ship class - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
ofc i support this idea since it was brouth by me. ===== * Your signature file is broken. Please use one that will display - Fallout
- by Cyberus - at 2009.05.25 18:13:00
|
169. Fleet bonus - Armor buff vs shield buff - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
+1 this did bother me every time. ===== * Your signature file is broken. Please use one that will display - Fallout
- by Cyberus - at 2009.05.01 18:38:00
|
170. How should ECM work? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Murina Originally by: Cyberus Meaby yes or meaby not. If you read ( and apologies for my bad english) i have already said that one of the primery counters vs. Ecm will be ECCM since it is will provide 100% sucess ...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.04.28 19:08:00
|
171. How should ECM work? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Murina Originally by: Cyberus 1st of what i think is by redusing range of ECM dramatecly so it will be not common module on every ship in game. I understand what you are trying to do but all reducing range on e...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.04.28 18:29:00
|
172. How should ECM work? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Murina Originally by: Cyberus I beleave you did understand it wrong. 100% chance will be only on the 1st module. What is to stop every ship in a gang with a free or available mid slot from fitting a single m...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.04.28 18:00:00
|
173. How should ECM work? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Jack Icegaard Originally by: Cyberus My 2 cents. 1) Remove all racial jammers 2) Boost multiespectrals strength and make it 100% chance as other El. warfare ( webs, damps, etc) 3) Add staking penaltys on them. ( so ...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.04.28 17:42:00
|
174. ECM Ship II - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
My 2 cents. 1) Remove all racial jammers 2) Boost multiespectrals strength and make it 100% chance as other El. warfare ( webs, damps, etc) 3) Add staking penaltys on them. ( so pilots dont fit more as 2.. max 3) to sucessfully count with eccm fi...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.04.28 17:12:00
|
175. How should ECM work? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
My 2 cents. 1) Remove all racial jammers 2) Boost multiespectrals strength and make it 100% chance as other El. warfare ( webs, damps, etc) 3) Add staking penaltys on them. ( so pilots dont fit more as 2.. max 3) to sucessfully count with eccm fi...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.04.28 17:10:00
|
176. Losing Interest - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
+1 ===== * Your signature file is broken. Please use one that will display - Fallout
- by Cyberus - at 2009.04.27 20:55:00
|
177. To all the "nerf local" posters: - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Realy look forward if CCP will implement this.. and yes i like the idea. But i will mostly not enjoy because of so clever idea but about all this most posters above who will start whine like babys again of forums that this new stuff did ruin they ...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.04.15 18:30:00
|
178. Delete! - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Cyberus on 31/03/2009 19:19:11 Edited by: Cyberus on 31/03/2009 19:10:22 Delete ===== * Your signature file is broken. Please use one that will display - Fallout
- by Cyberus - at 2009.03.31 19:06:00
|
179. Time to revisit the NH? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Gypsio III 7-7-3 is an interesting idea but I've always liked the 6-4 med-low configuration, as it allows for the ideal DC and triple-BCS fit. Oh, and to anyone ranting on about the NH's "uber passive tank" in PVP, you're ...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.03.31 12:48:00
|
180. Time to revisit the NH? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Spartan dax Naah, you got it all wrong Sidius. The NH should have a 7/7/3 slot layout together with a modest boost in powergrid and the bonuses extended to HAMS as well. Having 5 lows on the thing as it does today....Yeah ...
- by Cyberus - at 2009.03.31 11:03:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |