| Pages: [1] |
1. Manufacturer's Trademark - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Gaijin Lanis wrote: Demyen wrote: Cynic. Only when it comes to other people's smegma. I mean, its not like a maker's mark could confer any sort of tangible bonus. Therefore it would just be smegma. In the real world people and companie...
- by Demyen - at 2014.07.27 16:59:00
|
2. Manufacturer's Trademark - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Gaijin Lanis wrote: Demyen wrote: Again, you're missing the point entirely. The point is you want to be able to rub your genitalia on everything you build and have people fly around with your smegma on the crap they buy. Ya know, to put it...
- by Demyen - at 2014.07.26 22:04:00
|
3. Manufacturer's Trademark - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
RavenTesio wrote: So really all you would be doing is adding more fluff information that people just won't care about. There needs to be some meaningful reason as to why Player X will only boy Corporation Y products, and with the currently in...
- by Demyen - at 2014.07.26 21:03:00
|
4. Manufacturer's Trademark - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Fer'isam K'ahn wrote: Sounds very much like a repost. Eh, I searched for similar threads before posting but didn't find anything. If you find one please let me know
- by Demyen - at 2014.07.26 15:57:00
|
5. Manufacturer's Trademark - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Alvatore DiMarco wrote: It annoys me to no end when dealerships put their stupid logo on my brand new car. It's my car, if anyone's logo is going to be on it then it should be mine. Why do I want your logo on my brand new ship? Answer me that ...
- by Demyen - at 2014.07.26 15:33:00
|
6. Manufacturer's Trademark - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Whereas CCP is now doing the research and development work to bring us the long-requested ability to paint pretty colors and patterns onto our Internet spaceships; Whereas the new SoE ships have lots of little logos of NPC companies painted o...
- by Demyen - at 2014.07.25 18:34:00
|
7. [CSM] New Eden Social Club - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I don't have any substantive thoughts on this yet besides being in favor of it, but if the final feature is distinct enough to merit an in-game name, please try to help it be a not dumb name. Neither "social clubs" nor "social groups" sound...New ...
- by Demyen - at 2014.07.07 02:30:00
|
8. Ship Warp Speed Missing from Wiki - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
So, ship entries in the EVE Wiki are currently missing warp speed data. This may or may not have been intentional, but it'd be nice to have.
- by Demyen - at 2012.03.04 05:40:00
|
9. Camera Control - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Pursuit camera! That's what it's called... HELLBOUND, what do you mean by bubble view exactly? Just a view that's way zoomed out so you see the whole "bubble" of the scene?
- by Demyen - at 2011.08.05 03:54:00
|
10. Camera Control - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Original thread: Linkage Hey guys, looking for some help with wording for a proposal I want to bring up in the CSM Assembly Hall. Long version: right now, when flying in space your camera stays static relative to, well, space. Your ship spins ...
- by Demyen - at 2011.07.31 23:29:00
|
11. Camera Lock - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Someone suggested that the explanation of my idea was less than perfect, so I'll restate just in case: Currently, your camera stays in one place relative to the environment unless you move it. I'd like to be able to shift that plane of reference ...
- by Demyen - at 2009.03.14 06:44:00
|
12. Ambient radio chatter!!!! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
/signed! That would be awesome.
- by Demyen - at 2009.03.12 20:04:00
|
13. Backstory: Planet and solar body descriptions. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Demyen on 10/03/2009 00:14:44 I third the motion! I'd love to see this, even if it takes a while to fully implement. Heck, I'd be happy to just have descriptions for significant planets and systems: everything that has a non-Capsule...
- by Demyen - at 2009.03.10 00:09:00
|
14. Camera Lock - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
No one else? Cummon!
- by Demyen - at 2009.03.09 02:29:00
|
15. Camera Lock - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I'd like to request one small feature: It would be really awesome if we could lock the camera position relative to our ship. Doesn't need to be too complicated; I'd just really like to be able to set my camera right behind my ship so I can watch t...
- by Demyen - at 2009.03.06 20:37:00
|
16. Idea - Changing the nature of targeting - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
While I think there's probably a better way to go about it than just removing the Overview's targeting function, I totally agree with Rhohan's basic ideas: combat "radio chatter" could be a lot more realistic, and there's not enough incentive to f...
- by Demyen - at 2009.03.06 20:20:00
|
17. Updates on exploration in arch sites - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Awesome! /signed
- by Demyen - at 2009.01.21 05:11:00
|
18. Ship Crews (They're Here, They're Real, get Over it) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Demyen on 21/01/2009 04:56:31 /signed. I've always wanted a crew. On the topic of crew numbers, I'd like to propose what should be a relatively simple solution while allowing for realistically high numbers: Each ship class has cert...
- by Demyen - at 2009.01.21 04:43:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |