| Pages: [1] |
1. Command Ship Nerf!? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Lord DeFault Command Ships are fine, They can't shot to far anyway :p Besides, If I trained for all those Months to use a Command ship and it got nerfed, I'd be very ...... off. On the BC Front, Only thing thats needed is ...
- by Feradwynn - at 2007.07.18 23:44:00
|
2. Command Ship Nerf!? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Ceta Dillar Originally by: Usul78 I thought that as the Command ship (230mil isk, requiring over 1 year of training) would have some sort of advantage over the T1 variety. It does, its called resistances. That be...
- by Feradwynn - at 2007.07.18 23:28:00
|
3. Command ships comparison (target range between classes) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I fly a raven, a nighthawk and a cerberus. The missiles on my raven exceed my targeting range by a lot. This is actually pretty common through out all the ships in Eve. You can shoot farther than you can target. They make targeting enhancement mod...
- by Feradwynn - at 2007.06.26 22:13:00
|
4. Command Ship Nerf!? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: tommit well i am against the hunt on caldari which have been going on ever since game start (as good as), i don't get it, since minmatar and exspecially gallente are pwning caldari in pvp. but anyway, the passive shield tan...
- by Feradwynn - at 2007.06.26 21:52:00
|
5. Command Ship Nerf!? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I've been flying a nighthawk since before the tier 2 BC's were released. When I found out that the drake was going to be a missile boat, I had mixed feelings. I thought, big deal, my nighthawk is already a tech 2 BC missile boat, why fly a drake w...
- by Feradwynn - at 2007.06.20 23:12:00
|
6. Bloggers #54, So my Agent called and has this "offer I can't refuse.." - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I spend a considerable quantity of time running missions. It is my major source of income, mainly because I don't have the time to deal with PvP all the time. I pop in game, run a mission and deal with corp related activities that need to be dealt...
- by Feradwynn - at 2007.02.24 00:04:00
|
7. Bloggers #53, Inventions, the Lottery System and a Call for Feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
My issue is that if the old BPO's remain in game that it will give an unfair advantage to those who have them making people working on the inefficient BPC's unable to compete. Either the lottery has to remain but be fixed so that the same people d...
- by Feradwynn - at 2007.02.23 23:42:00
|
8. Field Command Ships - what a waste of time - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Shadarle Alrighty, here is the tanking comparison. The nighthawk can tank 632.65 damage at peak recharge averaged against all 4 resists. EM=61.19% or 266.38 max EM tank Expl=84.48% or 665.95 max Expl tank Kin=85.45% or 710....
- by Feradwynn - at 2006.12.11 19:52:00
|
9. The T2 ship that isn't - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T Edited by: Akita T on 11/12/2006 13:00:09 1a&1b: 6 launchers with -25% RoF equals 8 launchers without RoF bonus. Besides, if you use extra-damage T2 heavies, you DO care about explo radius then too. 2a&2b: h...
- by Feradwynn - at 2006.12.11 19:13:00
|
10. The T2 ship that isn't - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Kataclismo WTF?! This ALL is just cuz T1 ships get a better hp boost than T2? T2 should be a BETTER version of a T1, not a indestructible, the way you are talking Vor makes T2 Ships sound like "IM IN A DEIMOS AND YOU IN A ...
- by Feradwynn - at 2006.12.11 18:22:00
|
11. The T2 ship that isn't - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: xaix ikkul Edited by: xaix ikkul on 08/12/2006 21:00:24 t2 ships were purposly not given the same amount of hp bonus as t1 ships because the devs want to bridge the gap between t1 and t2. t2 was never meant to be the all...
- by Feradwynn - at 2006.12.08 21:53:00
|
12. The T2 ship that isn't - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: xaix ikkul Edited by: xaix ikkul on 08/12/2006 21:00:24 t2 ships were purposly not given the same amount of hp bonus as t1 ships because the devs want to bridge the gap between t1 and t2. t2 was never meant to be the all...
- by Feradwynn - at 2006.12.08 21:51:00
|
13. The T2 ship that isn't - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Jaketh Ivanes nighthawk has more bomuses. More slots to fill and is cooler looking. The Nighthawk has 1 more low slot than the Ferox, and better base resists I will grant you. The problem with comparing a nighthawk and a...
- by Feradwynn - at 2006.12.08 17:14:00
|
14. Tech 2 BC Philosophy - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I was recently comparing the T2 and T1 battlecruiser. I discovered some interesting information when looking at Nighthawks, Drakes and Feroxes. Feroxes and Drakes have more shield, armor and structural points than the tech 2 Nighthawk. The Drake h...
- by Feradwynn - at 2006.12.08 14:38:00
|
15. The T2 ship that isn't - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
With the recent changes to many of the ships in Eve it is obvious that not everything was taken into consideration. As an example, take a look at the nighthawk, a t2 BC in relation to the T1 BC's Nighthawk shields are now a 4805 base, while the F...
- by Feradwynn - at 2006.12.08 06:34:00
|
16. Zapatero blogs about E-ON Issue #001? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I could care less about the collectible status of EON #1. And at $175, you can bet I won't be the one to buy it from a collector either. What I want is the information contained within the mag, even if the information is becoming a bit long in the...
- by Feradwynn - at 2006.09.02 17:33:00
|
17. [Recruitment] - Freedom-Technologies. ALL professions welcome! - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Hey guys, there are some good reasons why you should join FTC. We have real live WOMEN in it. Really, a few of us are actually women. I know you all think we are an illusion or something but women do actually play this game. And I think 50% of the...
- by Feradwynn - at 2006.08.03 22:24:00
|
18. New lvl 3 mission WAY to hard - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
This is an extremely tough mission set. I managed to complete stage 1 with help from a corp mate, stage 2 is a courier mission and is simple, stage 3 is insane! I completed it solo, it took 4 hours and cost me a ferox. I had to warp in and out rep...
- by Feradwynn - at 2006.01.13 18:18:00
|
19. Why move agent during holiday period!!! - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Frankly I am not angry that they are moving them, and the idiot who says it is a good idea is apparently completely missing the point as is the moron who thinks that is no big deal that they are doing it during the holidays. The point is geniuses,...
- by Feradwynn - at 2005.12.24 01:44:00
|
20. Why can't we run missions till next year? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Frankly I am ****ed and am seriously considering canceling my account. I understand bugs, and understand new problems associated with new material. What I do NOT understand is some moron taking away my ability to play the game I PAY for no good re...
- by Feradwynn - at 2005.12.23 01:15:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |