Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. Looking for a corp in Impass or Catch - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Edited by: Motseth on 02/06/2011 13:01:36 Bomp Unrelated to EVE: Did you know that SL Benfica player Eusebio da Silva Ferreira, one of the best players of all times, mainly in the 60s, was given a millionary contract with AC Milan but at the ...
- by Motseth - at 2011.06.02 12:57:00
|
2. Looking for a corp in Impass or Catch - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
What Im looking for: Must have solar systems where I can rat and do whatever to raise isks. A corp that does or intends to do pvp ops (occasionally or regularly) is better than one that dont. Low taxes, 5% or lower fine, 5% to 10% its not fine, mo...
- by Motseth - at 2011.06.01 21:39:00
|
3. Remove Stargates - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I don't like the idea of ending stargates for many many reasons but I understand your idea. What I completly agree with is the end of local everywhere, people can still chat in local just like in wormholes. A new module could be introduced and it...
- by Motseth - at 2011.02.23 14:56:00
|
4. Remote Repairing and Blobing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Everyone complains about how blobing is the ultimate end-game, they are of course right, blobs bring tons of DPS and RR. DPS can be dealt with tactics, RR not that much. So the small alliances trying to have fun and a nice fight only get ****d, in...
- by Motseth - at 2011.02.23 14:41:00
|
5. New Dev Blog: Character Creator Update - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
At first it looked like all chars would continue to look the same but after some time I found out that is not true, I like the new chars Good job CCP
- by Motseth - at 2011.01.26 19:10:00
|
6. An update on Level 5 Missions - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
All high profit jobs should be in lowsec and highsec, highsec should provide low income compared to lowsec, highsec for obvious reasons should remain as the most profitable systems. I see people complaining about their massive profits becoming har...
- by Motseth - at 2010.11.26 20:05:00
|
7. MACROMINERS are now LEGAL in EVE!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think people dont understand how things work, CCP cant punish a player for being a macro based on your worthless opinion and petition. You must have proof that the player is indeed using a macro and that is almost impossible to do. Just because...
- by Motseth - at 2010.08.07 17:26:00
|
8. Red Federation versus Blue Republic - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
great, so many people annoyed about "another RvB thread", objective accomplished!!! Shame Applebabe filtered my nice words about them. Now please stop posting about how annoyed u are are about annoying RvB threads its becoming annoying to see peo...
- by Motseth - at 2010.07.27 18:06:00
|
9. Starting PVP - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
The best thing u can do in my opinion is to join RvB, check it out on the forums, pretty sure u can find a lot of information RvB is a cheap way to get initiated into PvP, if u are a active player in a good week u will be involved in a lot of fig...
- by Motseth - at 2010.07.25 14:41:00
|
10. Red Federation versus Blue Republic - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
I was checking the forum and found a happy RvB member posting about RvB and the replies are always the same, bla bla annoying RvB recruiting members, bla bla bla. Please go ffff yourselves and your pathetic undermining of RvB, if you dont like pe...
- by Motseth - at 2010.07.25 14:33:00
|
11. EVE pvp - Warfare core concept is missing from game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Shadow Buzzard I cant tell if you are being sarcastic or not when you say planes and helicopters are the most important asset in a carrier group and not the carrier itself but each asset in the group has its own purpose I th...
- by Motseth - at 2010.04.30 12:48:00
|
12. EVE pvp - Warfare core concept is missing from game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: darius mclever IMHO ... more creative use of the existing ships by players to change warfare is what we need. If CCP changes something, they just change the boundary. PL just ran over some folks with armor tanked HACs using...
- by Motseth - at 2010.04.30 12:36:00
|
13. EVE pvp - Warfare core concept is missing from game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: menacemyth stuff Great post, lots of good information. Totally agree with the terrain difference, empty space versus our Earth warfare is completely different, same for what you say about carriers, not just the planes ar...
- by Motseth - at 2010.04.28 14:59:00
|
14. EVE pvp - Warfare core concept is missing from game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: BornePassive stuff Thank you for your words, good to know that there are players that like this idea.=) Yes it seems that some people didn't read the posts but it seems that some people read them, some are apprehensive ...
- by Motseth - at 2010.04.28 14:46:00
|
15. EVE pvp - Warfare core concept is missing from game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Shadow Buzzard But comparing EVE to real life doesnt go well ever a friend of mine just learned that on the forums people just want to shut their eyes and think everything around them is completely made up in eve (its nkt by...
- by Motseth - at 2010.04.28 14:23:00
|
16. EVE pvp - Warfare core concept is missing from game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Xonus Calimar stuff. finally someone that brings something that opposes my theory and is well constructed and justified, thank you. Yes I agree with you, like I said in the first posts I made, this would be a change tha...
- by Motseth - at 2010.04.27 17:46:00
|
17. EVE pvp - Warfare core concept is missing from game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Space Pinata Did you know that almost every large ship in EVE carries a set of smaller ships inside of it? These are called 'drones'. There are more drones than ships on the field. Drones are smaller and faster. /threa...
- by Motseth - at 2010.04.27 17:10:00
|
18. EVE pvp - Warfare core concept is missing from game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Xonus Calimar I'm not quite sure if I can identify the exact "idea" or "feature" you are suggesting. You have put forth a lot of text identifying what you see as a problem. That's fine with me, you can voice your opinion. ...
- by Motseth - at 2010.04.27 15:54:00
|
19. EVE pvp - Warfare core concept is missing from game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: darius mclever just because certain ships got a bigger number in fleets, doesnt really mean the rest is under represented. your real life fleets/troops got a certain focus aswell. you got bombers with anti air support. you g...
- by Motseth - at 2010.04.26 18:12:00
|
20. EVE pvp - Warfare core concept is missing from game - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Space Pinata ...Because building/fielding the bigger, stronger ships was harder. If the opportunity cost (one pilot, with isk not a factor) was the same for a battleship and a frigate in any real naval situation, you can...
- by Motseth - at 2010.04.26 17:55:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |