Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Lederstrumpf
|
Posted - 2010.08.07 13:21:00 -
[121]
Originally by: IDieAlotInGateCamps
Originally by: My Postman [..]watch the pod "mining", returning over and over again.[..]
This is indeed the only sure way to reveal a macro user
Bump the miner out of mining laser range. If he returns from station without being annoyed at least if you start to bump him away again -- well..
|
Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.08.07 16:32:00 -
[122]
Originally by: Yodabunny "statistically impossible"
No such thing. 0 = impossible, anything with a zero isn't a statistic. The word statistic insinuates possibility.
There is only one known zero, which is in fact the net sum of the universe.
Carry on. This is clearly a signature. |
Necrosmith
Gallente Chunder Corp
|
Posted - 2010.08.07 17:12:00 -
[123]
Storing clicked pixels won't work. All a macro has to do is randomly click in an area to each click to bypass this.
There's plenty of room to click on a single asteroid in the overview, for example. __________________ Follow me on Twitter
|
Motseth
|
Posted - 2010.08.07 17:26:00 -
[124]
I think people dont understand how things work, CCP cant punish a player for being a macro based on your worthless opinion and petition. You must have proof that the player is indeed using a macro and that is almost impossible to do.
Just because someone mines 15h in a row everyday that does not mean he is using a macro, just means he is a devoted miner and someone who need psychiatric help urgently (just joking), but its that person problem and none of us have anything to do with it. If he does not respond to your messages, your provocations that can just means he does not give a flower about u. AFAIK no one is required to answer whatever.
If u understand how complex a macro can be u would know that a macro scanner is not that hard to build so it doesnt matter whatever u do, if it does not require decisions based on different variables on multiple instances in a variable occurrence (like most pvp and some pve) it can be macroed.
Macros is something people need to learn to deal with, they are here and they are not going anywhere anytime soon.
|
Tanthalassa
|
Posted - 2010.08.07 17:53:00 -
[125]
I think that assumption that CCP even wants to ban the macroers is wrong in the first place.
Don't hate me for bringing wow example in the discussion, it is just to make my point clear enough:
Used to play wow plenty, and hated all the bots there. 12 million subscriptions base, while bots are running rampant. Now compare that to this company called CCP, which has one cluster with only 40k avg (or whatever) online at a time.
Do you really want 'em ban macroers? Heck, by now I'd think that's probably huge percentage of their player base.
I hated bots in wow, i reported em in hundreds literally just to see 'em come back later. In the end what happened? I was actually banned 2 times from it with basic excuse "we found your account hijacked, so now you are banned for your protection" lol So , do not go overboard with reporting, or they might start claiming you report "innocent" miners and slap you with ban hammer in the end
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |