| Pages: [1] |
1. How Alliances Should Defend Their Empire Operations - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Peep on 21/03/2005 04:29:28 Cont.... Originally by: Latex Mistress Issue #4: Intelligence Discussion: For empire wars, intellingence is all too easy - the use of alts is rampant and completely out of control. There's...
- by Peep - at 2005.03.21 04:20:00
|
2. How Alliances Should Defend Their Empire Operations - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
How about a number of small PvP only corps are the attackers? Their mission is only to pirate soft targets. Originally by: Latex Mistress Issue #1: Alliances can't defend empire ops Discussion: Alliances cannot abandon 0.0 for an Emp...
- by Peep - at 2005.03.21 04:01:00
|
3. CYVOKs EvE WAR system ideas - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Joshua Foiritain The alliance system is quite simply, Xetic for example chose Quantity over Quality. Theyre by far the biggest alliance in game and are completly unable to defend their empire operations. Yet, i dont see an...
- by Peep - at 2005.03.21 02:28:00
|
4. EVE *Bleeps*! Dev(s) please give us a reason to stay - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Cunny Originally by: Gevronder Originally by: Nero Scuro It's not griefing to attack a large, undefended, rich alliance It's CCP / Concorde sanctioned empire griefing and you know it. Give me a blo...
- by Peep - at 2005.03.20 22:52:00
|
5. CYVOKs Making a POS not a P.O.S, Ideas - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I like the ideas you posted CYVOK but rather then have an almost indestructible POS how about something along these lines? Although attacking it might be a lag fest. A POS with a FULL defense setup should require around 20 BSÆs to kill it over 6...
- by Peep - at 2005.03.20 13:21:00
|
6. Feature Request: Add new Ammo Bay to ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Even if you could just sticky your ammo to the top of the bay so you don't have to sort it out of the loot later would be good.
- by Peep - at 2005.03.20 10:05:00
|
7. EVE *Bleeps*! Dev(s) please give us a reason to stay - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ibobah'k Chisaraj Originally by: Peep No amount of organization can kill someone holed up in a station until you leave or there is a soft target in system. Well, you didnt miss my point did you? The point was to...
- by Peep - at 2005.03.20 09:42:00
|
8. CYVOKs EvE WAR system ideas - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CYVOK 2) The Contract This is specifically designed for Merc Corps. This is how it works. RA hires MC to take a contract against BA. The terms are that MC must deal a certain amount of damage to BA to complete the contra...
- by Peep - at 2005.03.20 08:05:00
|
9. CYVOKs EvE Alts ideas - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I cannot see this idea of bloodlines working at all. I have two accounts, now not on purpose but I paid for them using different credit cards. There is no way CCP could connect the two accounts. And on the other side say you have 2 people playing...
- by Peep - at 2005.03.20 06:54:00
|
10. An observational ramble... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Darken Two Originally by: Dau Imperius Originally by: Ly'sol All the carebear activities are PVP but I guess that doesnt count does it? Wrong it's called PvE. And I don't 'care' if you understand or not....
- by Peep - at 2005.03.20 05:56:00
|
11. EVE *Bleeps*! Dev(s) please give us a reason to stay - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ibobah'k Chisaraj Originally by: Peep With the game mechanics your small PvP only corp can declare war on a 5000+ alliance. Now this alliance is going to have thousands of carebears (soft targets) they can now gank i...
- by Peep - at 2005.03.20 04:47:00
|
12. NEW Devblog Stealth Bombers, Smaler POS and some other cool stuff - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: At'lana Tir'freven IMHO alliances should only be able to attack other alliances ... corperations against other corperations etc ... set a weekly/monthly operation fee to maintain the alliance infrastructure and keeping the a...
- by Peep - at 2005.03.20 02:50:00
|
13. EVE *Bleeps*! Dev(s) please give us a reason to stay - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Nero Scuro This entire argument is defunct on the simple fact that you're 5000 ******* PEOPLE WHO ARE COMPLAINING BECAUSE 'GRIEFER'S' ARE ATTACKING YOU! Under any other circumstance, declaring war on an alliance would be con...
- by Peep - at 2005.03.20 00:43:00
|
14. Nafri thought of Alliances, 0.0 and Empire (no Spamm inside) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Alekseika WAR SYSTEM: Status Quo: War is declared. People can shoot each other in Empire. Only chance to fight back is shoot back. Industrials/Mining barges are targeted. Even when accompagnied by an escort, they are targ...
- by Peep - at 2005.03.19 23:36:00
|
15. Nafri thought of Alliances, 0.0 and Empire (no Spamm inside) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Peep on 19/03/2005 06:17:39 Originally by: Hobbsalong Edited by: Hobbsalong on 19/03/2005 05:47:56 Quote: IÆm a carebear not through choice but because I am just under 3 months old and am trying to get some ISK tog...
- by Peep - at 2005.03.19 06:16:00
|
16. Nafri thought of Alliances, 0.0 and Empire (no Spamm inside) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
IÆm a carebear not through choice but because I am just under 3 months old and am trying to get some ISK together while training my learning skills up. When I grow up I hope to take my BS and kick some ass in 0.0 one day. But for now mining and ag...
- by Peep - at 2005.03.19 05:33:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |