| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Dirk Smacker wrote: Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: 2.) The doomsday predictions will come true, and the war will stagnate, fights will decrease, and I will have demonstrated to CCP that they should have listened to me and pared back the multiplie...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.14 22:01:00
|
2. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lock out wrote: Mutnin wrote: 1st off I will say you are a lucky **** to get that Navy Geddon out the other day in structure and the friendly carriers were totally unexpected from us. We jumped into behind you guys started shooting stuff a...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.14 11:02:00
|
3. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Mutnin wrote: [quote=Lock out] I'm not interested in sov warfare so I'd likely just go pie again or just start roaming in null sec for random fights.. The station locks out are kinda a deal breaker for me , but I'll at least give it a try for...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.14 09:36:00
|
4. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Veshta Yoshida wrote: The current system was to supposedly to be a template for a sovereignty revamp, FW was once upon a time a null guinea pig .. but CCP chickened out. Remember all the talk prior to Dominion about CCP wanting null sov to b...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.14 04:18:00
|
5. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Vordak Kallager wrote: RougeOperator wrote: SigmaPi wrote: Or the revival, perhaps? Sigma, explain how this leads to a revival? I want some detailed reasoning as to how. Cause All i see is tracks being laid for it to be null sec lig...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.14 02:32:00
|
6. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
SigmaPi wrote: Or the revival, perhaps? Sigma, explain how this leads to a revival? I want some detailed reasoning as to how. Cause All i see is tracks being laid for it to be null sec light. Needing logistic chains and super blobs is whe...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.13 23:14:00
|
7. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Veshta Yoshida wrote: What we are getting is FW as seen through the eyes of null .. since changes are 99% identical to the Fanfest presentation it must have been planned based on feedback from the pure null CSM .. in that light it is understand...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.13 07:12:00
|
8. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Silence iKillYouu wrote: Wait and see. How about NO. Im sick of that "wait and see line." I have seen so many games and MMOs die because the fanbase took this stance. After so many horrible games this year and decisions by game compani...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.13 06:09:00
|
9. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
What we have to look forward too now is worse stagnation in FW then we had before.
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.13 01:11:00
|
10. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
When the fun created by the NEW SHINY stuff in the expansions ends after a month we will be stuck with how bad this is it will be too late. Obvious problems being if one faction dominates a zone. FW is not like 0.0 its full of casual or semi ...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.12 00:19:00
|
11. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
SigmaPi wrote: RougeOperator wrote: Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: The long-awaited Dev Blog is up!! http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=28659 ... Maybe its just me but I tend to think the goal should be to make ...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.09 23:13:00
|
12. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: The long-awaited Dev Blog is up!! http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=28659 Well its clear that CCP wants to basically kill FW. The goal being FW light. I could put up with most of the...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.09 22:50:00
|
13. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
X Gallentius wrote: RougeOperator wrote: This whole thing is not very well thought out. It was very well thought out on the forums months ago. You have amazing low standards for what is well thought out then. This comes off as RP f...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.09 02:13:00
|
14. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Mutnin wrote: Any game mechanic that makes it harder to operate under that mechanic but easier to leave is a flawed game mechanic. Why should I place my corp at a disadvantage to pirates that can dock in the stations I can't? This right her...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.09 02:09:00
|
15. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
My major concern here is that they are making these changes for FLUFF RP reasons. Which although fun, are terrible places to start from a perspective of game play and game balance. Though they should be consider as to how rules and elements of g...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.05 04:45:00
|
16. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
The docking rights shut out is terrible. The devs should be ashamed for not seeing why. Its DOA idea. Turning off station services and having station guns shoot is fine. But this bad on in many ways. Im not going to get into the whys and what...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.05.04 02:08:00
|
17. SOTF / WBR and the PL Titan Kill And the Moaners - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Vordak Kallager wrote: Silence iKillYouu wrote: My entire alliance would suicide 3bill if they were asked to. We are very rich and bored. Except AUTOZ. AUTOZ is just a bunch of ISK-deficient spacehobos. Confirming subsistence livin...
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.03.25 05:13:00
|
18. Intel on Big Kills for those that can catch them. - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
The first post makes me want to help them take out the POS now.
- by RougeOperator - at 2012.03.08 18:09:00
|
19. Fighting PL, advice? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Cletus Graeme wrote: As you can see from their modest claims and humble posts, AA totally owned us while we were in Amamake to the extent that we were terrified to even undock while they fapped off to their massive boners. Their use of dispos...
- by RougeOperator - at 2011.12.18 08:49:00
|
20. CONSPIRACY - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Alita Ishtal wrote: Your Whinedar is off nerds.This is a blatant act of favoritism,The ships in question wer not self destructed. Its Rage and Tears Pixel Punk.L2Type. The rage is in my pants,And if you were to get some you would be in tears...
- by RougeOperator - at 2011.12.02 19:31:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |